Seattle Zack
Count each one
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2003
- Posts
- 1,128
This morning, while waiting for some e-mail, I browsed through the "Story Ideas" section and it reminded me of an experience I'd had at my local watering hole a few weeks ago.
I was drinking Red Hook and chatting with a winsome wench who also had an interest in writing, specifically erotic writing. There was an obnoxious boor on the other side of me who kept trying to cockblock, interjecting himself into our conversations. When he overheard that I was a writer, he said, "Dude! We should get together! I have so many ideas for books!"
The not-yet-lubricated-enough young lass had excused herself to go to the bathroom and, against my better judgement, I asked this moron what, exactly, was the literary masterpiece he had in mind.
"It's about this group of cops, right? And they rip off drug dealers!"
Smelling bestseller list or at least a movie deal, I asked him to expound further. Who are the characters? What are their conflicts? What's the resolution? What's the story arc?
"I don't know," he said, a confused look on his face. "You're the writer ... can't you come up with that stuff?"
Ah, yes. Which brings me to my gripe. I've had this conversation before, dozens of times. Why is it generally assumed by non-writers that writing is, in itself, a talentless exercise? Why isn't the exercise of writing more accepted as a craft? For example, I would never suggest to an architect, "I've got a great idea for a building, if someone would just design it."
We revere craftsmen in our society -- artists, musicians, film directors, woodworkers, sculptors. Yet, the perception seems to be that the "idea" is the essential part of writing. I know a lot of writers, and I don't know one capable of creating complex characters, intricately developed plots, and compelling, realistic dialogue who sits at home saying "I wish I had an idea to write about!"
The magnum opus doesn't spring, full-blown, from an idea, no matter how good. When I write, I struggle over every word and punctuation mark. I re-write the same damn paragraph six times to create the mental picture I have in my head. I have thousands of ideas, and not enough talent, time, or effort to bring them to fruition.
Technical proficiency is one thing, but good writers are true artists in their use of words. The great writers throughout history didn't just have good ideas -- they had a gift for communication that is enviably wonderous to behold.
I do a lot of technical writing, which basically involves translating geek into English. One of the things I get paid to do is provide "content" for websites. Even the term is somewhat disparaging. It's as if the words on the screen are the least important part. Indeed, in this ultra-formatted flashing-icon triple-linked society, perhaps they are.
Just my gripe for the day.
--Zack
I was drinking Red Hook and chatting with a winsome wench who also had an interest in writing, specifically erotic writing. There was an obnoxious boor on the other side of me who kept trying to cockblock, interjecting himself into our conversations. When he overheard that I was a writer, he said, "Dude! We should get together! I have so many ideas for books!"
The not-yet-lubricated-enough young lass had excused herself to go to the bathroom and, against my better judgement, I asked this moron what, exactly, was the literary masterpiece he had in mind.
"It's about this group of cops, right? And they rip off drug dealers!"
Smelling bestseller list or at least a movie deal, I asked him to expound further. Who are the characters? What are their conflicts? What's the resolution? What's the story arc?
"I don't know," he said, a confused look on his face. "You're the writer ... can't you come up with that stuff?"
Ah, yes. Which brings me to my gripe. I've had this conversation before, dozens of times. Why is it generally assumed by non-writers that writing is, in itself, a talentless exercise? Why isn't the exercise of writing more accepted as a craft? For example, I would never suggest to an architect, "I've got a great idea for a building, if someone would just design it."
We revere craftsmen in our society -- artists, musicians, film directors, woodworkers, sculptors. Yet, the perception seems to be that the "idea" is the essential part of writing. I know a lot of writers, and I don't know one capable of creating complex characters, intricately developed plots, and compelling, realistic dialogue who sits at home saying "I wish I had an idea to write about!"
The magnum opus doesn't spring, full-blown, from an idea, no matter how good. When I write, I struggle over every word and punctuation mark. I re-write the same damn paragraph six times to create the mental picture I have in my head. I have thousands of ideas, and not enough talent, time, or effort to bring them to fruition.
Technical proficiency is one thing, but good writers are true artists in their use of words. The great writers throughout history didn't just have good ideas -- they had a gift for communication that is enviably wonderous to behold.
I do a lot of technical writing, which basically involves translating geek into English. One of the things I get paid to do is provide "content" for websites. Even the term is somewhat disparaging. It's as if the words on the screen are the least important part. Indeed, in this ultra-formatted flashing-icon triple-linked society, perhaps they are.
Just my gripe for the day.
--Zack