Wrestlemania VI who was right? gore or clinton?

[WriterDom]

WASHINGTON, Feb 7 (Reuters) - A few days after former Vice President Al Gore conceded the 2000 presidential election, he and former President Bill Clinton had what sources described as a "blunt" exchange, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

In what sources close to both men described as uncommonly blunt language, Gore forcefully told Clinton that his sex scandal and low personal approval ratings were a major impediment to his presidential campaign, the Post said.

People close to Clinton told the newspaper the former president responded with equal force that it was Gore's failure to run on the administration's record that hobbled his ambition.

Before the White House showdown, which lasted for more than an hour, Gore and Clinton had barely spoken for a year, the Post said.

Only Clinton and Gore were present for the meeting, which Gore initiated and which never appeared on internal schedules distributed to White House staff, according to the Post.

 

[Starfish]

I'll have to say, Nader was right. Clinton and Gore are both whiney little, sell-out bitches. And with that said who wants a whiney little, sell-out bitch for president.

 

[Andra_Jenny]

The two letters to each other posted on newsmax.com are a real hoot! I think Gore has some points, but he did run before in the primaries and not win. Then again Herr Goebbels was on with Chris Matthews yesterday and he is still talking about how Gore did not loose. It is going to be a point of speculation for many years to come. Really he should have stood up to the Clinton's much earlier. like when things are really happening. I think he voided his right to whine at that point. Once he decided to shuck his and Tipper's values, he became a co-conspiritor and condoned the action. Just my thought.