Hester
hesterosexual
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2004
- Posts
- 21,948
ha! quite possible.crazybbwgirl said:Maybe NOT being married IS having your cake and eating it too?
i was talking about a hypothetical "their" (other people) cake, not my own.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ha! quite possible.crazybbwgirl said:Maybe NOT being married IS having your cake and eating it too?
Hester said:i think it's a bit more complex than the housework issue, although i do believe that plays a part. educated, financially able women know their power more, know they have more options, travel more, have more temptations and have the confidence that if caught they can survive on their own. less educated, more financially dependent women might be less likely to cheat or complain in a marriage because of concerns about their futures.
this all is not to say that there aren't women who can have their cake and eat it, too. apparently, though, statistically it's less likely than previously thought.
Hester said:wow. i won't get into how the presentation of those studies is a bit skewed (i'll leave that to the letter-to-the-editor writing types), but i will say no man in his right mind would marry me while i was working. i've made no secret that marriage isn't a priority of mine, but in the odd event i found a man i wanted to marry i'd give up my career and stay home and tend the home and my investments. *maybe* i'd take on some part-time consulting.
i fit into the "ultra-achieving" category and my career is where it is because i'm so focused and driven and insane about it. i can understand how this would totally fuck up a marriage, which is why i'd leave my career if i ever decided to get married---if i commit to something i need to make it my priority and i know this about myself. marriage would definitely fit into that category and there's no way i could honestly give both my career and my marriage the attention they deserve at the same time. i'm not wired that way. i am also lucky enough to be in a position where this is a choice for me.
that said, i've yet to encounter a man who would make me seriously consider a move like that and don't know if such a beast exists.
littlegirlslut said:So the only reason a woman should stay is because she financially dependent - forget happiness. Just stay because you have no other choice.
Doesn't this mean though - that when the man makes the decision to leave - it leaves the woman with nothing?
Was this post sarcasm?
the captians wench said:...snip... You can't pay the bills with happiness.
i've actually done it once. not for marriage but for cohabitation. i was really surprised at my level of happiness and contentment. it was a good lesson for me. but we're all different, which is one of the things that makes life so interesting.chris9 said:I know I would become very inactive, lazy, discontented with my life if I stayed at home for any length of time without children being in the equation.
I understand that for you this is different, and the very best to me is that we can make that choice, see what's best for oneself/one's partner/the relationship/the future.
i love to see how we all come from different viewpoints and experiences. i am quite the opposite to you. i am excessively independent and self-reliant, at one point almost militantly so. always have been. so much so that i think at times it's been to my detriment. i've had to learn how to allow others to care for me and help me and i had to learn that that's okay and it doesn't make me a weaker or lesser person, in fact that if done well can make me stronger and help me grow.the captians wench said:I didn't work thru out the main part of my marriage. Infact I only started working when he had made the choice that it was about time to end the marriage. He worked hard to prepair me for my new life of supporting myslef, tho I did not know this at the time. I never wanted to work, and never had a set career other than to be the happy home maker. Now that i am on my own, and have been for almost 2 years, I've noticed a change in my attitude. I'm still not exactly persuing a career, but I am doing more things to bennifet myself insted of just looking for the next man to take care of me as I had thought I would end up. I still would drop my life in a heart beat at Master's command, but that's simply because a carrer out side the home has never been important to me. My experience has shown me that I can take care of myself, which was one of the main reasons I didn't want out of my marriage when things got bad. It was an issue. I was afraid that I would end up on the streets as I had not worked in 3 years and when I did it was never longer than 6 months. So yes, happiness was an issue, but survival was a bigger one. Had I been more financially stable ( I was still only working part time and we only owned one car so i had to rely on him to take me to work) then I probably would have left sooner. What makes you happy is not always what you have to do in order to live. You can't pay the bills with happiness.
chris9 said:As for men not wanting/being able to stand it if their women make more money:
I believe I'm noticing a change there. For my father and more especially his friends it would have been hard to accept. For my friends (none is 30 yet) it sounds from what they say like it would be easy.
Hester said:i love to see how we all come from different viewpoints and experiences. i am quite the opposite to you. i am excessively independent and self-reliant, at one point almost militantly so. always have been. so much so that i think at times it's been to my detriment. i've had to learn how to allow others to care for me and help me and i had to learn that that's okay and it doesn't make me a weaker or lesser person, in fact that if done well can make me stronger and help me grow.
i can count on one hand the times i've truly allowed another person to take care of me and help me and/or to stay at home and take a nurturing role, but those experiences were really good for me and increased the intimacy in those relationships. it's not something i *have* to do, but rather something i chose to do in very special circumstances and if done right i get an awful lot out of it. but i think that's the difference---having the choice rather than feeling stuck.
i'm very glad to hear you are in a different place and things are working well for youthe captians wench said:I didn't really feel stuck until things got bad. I had made the choice not to work or learn a skill, go to school anything like that. I was living my dream at the time that the marriage started, but it ended in heartache and a feeling like I wouldn't be able to survive. I am still very much dependant on other people. I "need" almost constant praise to reasure me that I am doing things right, or that I am loved, special, pretty, what have you. But now I also know that I can make it on my own and I don't have to have some one taking care of me 24/7. I still, like I said, would drop my life in a heart beat to conform to what my love wanted, but it's a choice that I make because I want to, I no longer feel like I need to. If that makes any since. Having Master's suport every step of the way has helped too. There are certain things that I do need from other people, but I know now that I can survive with out another, if I have to.
are you sure the resentment is predominantly financial in nature?Netzach said:I've found that a lot of women, if you push them, secretly resent it when they do make more money. How many of those career women bitching in the articles have issues respecting anyone who makes less money than they do including their spouse?
Etoile said:I find it interesting how some relationships incorporate work life into their dynamic, and some don't. I think it was Eb who said one of her slaves has complete autonomy in terms of work - that's an example of someone who doesn't incorporate it. And I know there are slaves whose masters won't let them work outside the home, that's the other end of it. Perhaps there are some who have autonomy to an extent but certain decisions must be consulted upon, or even just have orders followed. Very interesting indeed.