Women raped in world war

KnightInArmour

Really Experienced
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Posts
281
Whenever a country goes to war, always women in the other nation are captured, raped or forced.This has happened in every war in every civilization and its one of the things that really turn me on.Would like to see some stories based on this idea.Like germans using young girls during the time of world war2 or anything similar.Like using them in a very organized manner just for the purpose of sexual fullfillment,selecting them amonst the people taken for being shot or those who are liable to be punished.Always selecting and not 'wasting' anything.Putting these girls to the best uses like a brothel for the army or something similar.Found a couple of stories based on the topic but they just are not enough.
 
I don't think rape during wartime (or really any other time) is generally systematic at all. And, usually, it's done more as a hatred for the enemy thing, rather then a sexual release activity.

However, in France during World War I, for example, they provided their troops with prostitutes.
 
bisexplicit said:
However, in France during World War I, for example, they provided their troops with prostitutes.

From what I understand, they spent a lot of effort trying to get the troops to stay away from the cathouses, to no avail. So eventually, they just started segregating the hookers. The ones who serviced officers were in brothels with blue lights at the door, the ones for enlisted men had red lights at their doors (hence: "Red Light District")

Think about that the next time you see a Blue Light Special at K-Mart :D
 
There are a couple of stories named french resistences 1 and 2 based on this similar topic.I was looking for something similar.Is not anyone interested in such a story.
 
bisexplicit said:
I don't think rape during wartime (or really any other time) is generally systematic at all. And, usually, it's done more as a hatred for the enemy thing, rather then a sexual release activity.

However, in France during World War I, for example, they provided their troops with prostitutes.
Nowadays maybe.

Back in the day it was one of the perks, along with looting.
 
bisexplicit:
'I don't think rape during wartime (or really any other time) is generally systematic at all. And, usually, it's done more as a hatred for the enemy thing, rather then a sexual release activity."

That might be wishful thinking on your part.. And isn't all rape more about hatred than sexual release?

"Rape was a weapon of terror as the German Hun marched through Belgium in World War I; gang rape was part of the orchestrated riots of Kristallnacht which marked the beginning of Nazi campaigns against the Jews. It was a weapon of revenge as the Russian Army marched to Berlin in World War II, it was used when the Japanese raped Chinese women in the city of Nanking, when the Pakistani Army battled Bangladesh, and when the American G.I.s made rape in Vietnam a 'standard operating procedure aimed at terrorizing the population into submission'."

1991-1994: Serbian paramilitary troops used rape systematically as a tactic to encourage Bosnian Muslim women to flee from their land.

1994: In Rwanda, Hutu leaders ordered their troops to rape Tutsi women as an integral part of their genocidal campaign.

1997: Secular women were targeted by Muslim revolutionaries in Algeria and reduced to sex slaves.

1998: Indonesian security forces allegedly raped ethnic Chinese women during a spate of major rioting.

Late 1990s: Serbian military and paramilitary units systematically raped ethnic Albanian Muslim women during the unrest in Kosovo.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/war_rape.htm
 
Last edited:
I'm still not getting it. What would the resolution be? The stories here are non-consent/RELUCTANT. Are the women supposed to fall in love with their captors, Stockholm syndrome? How exactly would it end?
 
Never said:
bisexplicit:
'I don't think rape during wartime (or really any other time) is generally systematic at all. And, usually, it's done more as a hatred for the enemy thing, rather then a sexual release activity."

That might be wishful thinking on your part.. And isn't all rape more about hatred than sexual release?

"Rape was a weapon of terror as the German Hun marched through Belgium in World War I; gang rape was part of the orchestrated riots of Kristallnacht which marked the beginning of Nazi campaigns against the Jews. It was a weapon of revenge as the Russian Army marched to Berlin in World War II, it was used when the Japanese raped Chinese women in the city of Nanking, when the Pakistani Army battled Bangladesh, and when the American G.I.s made rape in Vietnam a 'standard operating procedure aimed at terrorizing the population into submission'."

1991-1994: Serbian paramilitary troops used rape systematically as a tactic to encourage Bosnian Muslim women to flee from their land.

1994: In Rwanda, Hutu leaders ordered their troops to rape Tutsi women as an integral part of their genocidal campaign.

1997: Secular women were targeted by Muslim revolutionaries in Algeria and reduced to sex slaves.

1998: Indonesian security forces allegedly raped ethnic Chinese women during a spate of major rioting.

Late 1990s: Serbian military and paramilitary units systematically raped ethnic Albanian Muslim women during the unrest in Kosovo.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/war_rape.htm

Hah. Thank you for informing me of my misconception. Although, I think I preferred to believe that it was sporadic terrorism, and not organized, purposeful torture.
 
Sean Renaud said:
You want to do a modern story or a mideval?
I want a modern story like that of Germans during the world war 2 or about the secret prisons and army brothels that have been built over the years for the American army.That is not fantasy anymore,It is fact,If you can believe it.
 
KnightInArmour said:
I want a modern story like that of Germans during the world war 2 or about the secret prisons and army brothels that have been built over the years for the American army.That is not fantasy anymore,It is fact,If you can believe it.

And if I can't believe it, does that mean it's not fact? :D
 
Mona said:
I'm still not getting it. What would the resolution be? The stories here are non-consent/RELUCTANT. Are the women supposed to fall in love with their captors, Stockholm syndrome? How exactly would it end?

I think this is a good point.

Lit is not going to post stories that promote outright rape and torture as something sexy. So, unless you want someone falling in love in your "secret prisons" (or at least, falling in lust), then I think this story won't be happening on lit.
 
Not that I want to turn this into a political debate but the worst thing that has even been alledged at US secret prisons is waterboarding, which while horrendous is far from electroshock, rape or any of the real forms of torture. A lot of peole it might hit too close to home for some right now. Me I like a good horrible story just to stir things up around here so US secret prisons is cool with me, we can either do a real WW2 or move along into a hypothetical WW3.

Thanks for answering my queation about modern or mideval, it wasn't necessary once I'd gotten less stupid and read the title I realized what a silly question it had been.
 
bisexplicit:
"Lit is not going to post stories that promote outright rape and torture as something sexy.'


Lit has already posted stories where outright rape and torture are 'sexy.'
 
I've done horrible monster snuff stories. They rarely reject anything here. We can work the stockholm syndrom if you prefer but honestly the only wayto know if Lit is going to reject something is to send it in. As long as there are no underage or real animals try and see.
 
Apparently, I have no idea what I'm talking about.

I thought I had spoken to people who had stories rejected for being "rape" rather then "nonconsent," but this thread does not prove to be a good track record of my correctness on issues.
 
You're not wrong Bi and apologize if I was rude. I just know that I've gotten away with it and seen others do it too. Finc for instance is really low on consent or even stockholm amongst his girls. I really think that as long as you don't break the cardinal rules of underage and bestiality that it is all up to the judgement of who ever reads them before they get posted.
 
Sean Renaud said:
... I really think that as long as you don't break the cardinal rules of underage and bestiality that it is all up to the judgement of who ever reads them before they get posted.
Yes - my experience, and that of some of the authors I have edited is that the various "Laurel"s are not consistent on this matter. They seem to try to be consistent on under age, but some of those still get through.
 
I think there are a pretty lot of stories at Lit that show outright rape and lust.And I have meta lot of women(when I posted in the personals) that want to be raped and used without aything called love existing in there.So I do not think that it should be rejected.It is a fantasy,it is cyber and this is not Nazism.Anything that is a fantasy should not be a taboo at all as far as I think.I read some reviews of real use of women by japanese soldiers as'Comfort Women' and I think I was very very turned on by it.Women are (the or used to be) the best afterspoils of an invading army.In the roman times, that was the major prize for which armies fought.And i guess I must have been such a general too at that fantastic times.I love the idea truly of women as pleasure objects,I mean its a fantasy.I can see them as being traded or captured as possesions.It is one of my best fantasies.And as long as it is a fantasy ,What is wrong with it.
So can Ihope to see such stories?
Anothher question:Are chyoo's stories incomplete always?Never seen a completed story.
 
[offtopic] Do you not know how to use a space bar between sentences? It makes for incredibly difficult reading. [/offtopic]

Also, there are fantasies that are taboo here, as mentioned above.

Regardless, your thread does not have to turn into a debate about that, and I hope you find someone willing to write your story.

(PS - I can't help but say, most women, I believe, who want to "play" rape, need a certain degree of trust first. Perhaps not love, but certainly trust.)
 
bisexplicit said:
[offtopic] Do you not know how to use a space bar between sentences? It makes for incredibly difficult reading. [/offtopic]
I certainly know more computers than you but i deliberately choose not to use a spacebar.If you dont like what you see, do not see anymore ,You are not forced for anything.
Have a good day
 
Last edited:
KnightInArmour said:
I certainly know more computers than you but i deliberately choose not to use a spacebar.If you dont like what you see, do not see anymore ,You are not forced for anything.
Have a good day

You know more computers than bisexplicit? For all you know, she may have invented the microprocessor, yet you're just gonna hang that assumption out there waiting for someone to bite it off? :D
 
KnightInArmour said:
I certainly know more computers than you but i deliberately choose not to use a spacebar.If you dont like what you see, do not see anymore ,You are not forced for anything.
Have a good day

I preapologize that this is not "on topic" concerning the story idea, but I have to respond to this post now. You deliberately choose to look ignorant when you post? Also, in your "location" part of your profile, etc, you may wish to reword it to say "in my castle" then.
 
KnightInArmour said:
I certainly know more computers than you but i deliberately choose not to use a spacebar.If you dont like what you see, do not see anymore ,You are not forced for anything.
Have a good day

The purpose of a message board is to convey ideas. If you would like to get more people to read your ideas, and understand them easily, it's best to conform to be readable for most people.

Also, this site is "literary" in nature. People tend to demand that certain grammar rules are obeyed.
 
Back
Top