Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange: “Next Leak Will Lead to Arrest of Hillary Clinton”

[xbb]

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/0...lead-to-arrest-of-hillary-clinton/#more-62644

 

[xbb]

https://socialsity.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/new-hillary-busted.jpg?w=700

 

[hashtag45]

While I'm sure of the fact that what they are presenting are factual,
I find it a bit odd that they're focusing only on Hillary.

Surely Trump must have had some shadey dealings in his past too (even if they might thought they weren't of that magnitude, still… )

 

[BotanyBoy]

Doesn't matter, it will just be ignored like everything else.

She could fucking murder a school bus worth of children on live TV with an AR-15 and she would not only never get charged but (D)'s would swoon and vote for her in record numbers.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

While I'm sure of the fact that what they are presenting are factual,
I find it a bit odd that they're focusing only on Hillary.

Surely Trump must have had some shadey dealings in his past too (even if they might thought they weren't of that magnitude, still… )

There is one big YUUUUUUUUGE difference.

Anything The Donald did was in the private sector where he could be pursued criminally, civilly, or by investigative reporting whereas everything Mrs. Clinton did was in the public sector where everything is protected by the elite class of rulers and the national press...

If she is elected, this protection will continue.

If he is elected, the press will be focused like a laser on everything he does hoping that with each news cycle, they have the gotcha moment that takes him and the Republican Party down.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Doesn't matter, it will just be ignored like everything else.

She could fucking murder a school bus worth of children on live TV with an AR-15 and she would not only never get charged but (D)'s would swoon and vote for her in record numbers.

Well, in her defense, she would make sure it was a bunch of white kids in Texas...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

And that link did not say one thing, outside of the headline that would leave us to believe she did anything to be arrested over...

 

[hashtag45]

There is one big YUUUUUUUUGE difference.

Anything The Donald did was in the private sector where he could be pursued criminally, civilly, or by investigative reporting whereas everything Mrs. Clinton did was in the public sector where everything is protected by the elite class of rulers and the national press...

If she is elected, this protection will continue.

If he is elected, the press will be focused like a laser on everything he does hoping that with each news cycle, they have the gotcha moment that takes him and the Republican Party down.

Good points.
I'm curious to read the counterarguments that libs. will put on the table.

My first thought was: well, what does it matter? Past behavior predicts future behavior, and if Trump did it in the private sector, it's quite likely that he'll do it in the public sector too.

But then I read the second part of your post " in the public sector where everything is protected by the elite class of rulers and the national press...If she is elected, this protection will continue."
-- In saying that, won't they (or Trump's replacements) continue doing the same thing as with Hillary?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why would they protect Trump?

Our national media votes and donates Democrat.

This is pretty much a proven fact; that same act committed by a Democrat is just sloppy, but tantamount to treason when it is a Republican. Many members of our national press walk in and out of the White House and Democrat administrations just as easily as you and I breathe.

 

[hashtag45]

Why would they protect Trump?

Our national media votes and donates Democrat.

This is pretty much a proven fact; that same act committed by a Democrat is just sloppy, but tantamount to treason when it is a Republican. Many members of our national press walk in and out of the White House and Democrat administrations just as easily as you and I breathe.

Indeed. A political ruler who is on the other fence from the massmedia would be the better choice.
That would ensure, in a way, one of the checks and closer scrutiny.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Indeed. A political ruler who is on the other fence from the massmedia would be the better choice.
That would ensure, in a way, one of the checks and closer scrutiny.

The free press, guaranteed its freedom to print by the first amendment should not take sides, but sadly it has. Thus, all Americans have lost the one crucial check on corrupt government; as long as they benefit from the corruption, by being able to take part in history with the election of the first black, the first woman, etc., or by inclusion in the government, get a power over our lives that cannot be overcome. In this manner, the IRS can freely target citizens of the US to dampen and suppress a political movement. A Secretary of State can make State secrets available for the easy hacking and she can be openly bribed by Wall Street, Corporate America, foreign corporations and foreign governments. When you tune into the national news, you are listening to the equivalent of Big Brother...

 

[xbb]

And that link did not say one thing, outside of the headline that would leave us to believe she did anything to be arrested over...

Another turnip seed....

It said the next release will show

Cunt you read

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No I cunt not...

Maybe you should quote it for us.

But the headline, for now, is now off-limits.

 

[xbb]

And that link did not say one thing, outside of the headline that would leave us to believe she did anything to be arrested over...

NY Ragazine isnt credible

My link clearly shows what he said,

Fret not Sen Sore, your fellow Cunt is immune

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I'm with Laurel on this one.

Unless you can provide quote and link...



I call bullshit.

 

[xbb]

Read the link

Of course you are with her

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

*bullshit*

 

[hashtag45]

So it was a false link?
There goes the GB adrenalin rush for the day.
We need to look for some shooting spree in the US or some suicide bombing in Europe.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

We need to talk common sense balloon regulation.

 

[xbb]

Sen Sore and her fellow sheep, cant read

so LOOK!

In the second video, RT America explains that while many are blaming Russia for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) email leak, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says there is no evidence to suggest that the DNC was hacked by the Russian government. Furthermore, Assange claims the next leak will lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton. RT correspondent Laura Smith has the report from London.

 

[xbb]

So it was a false link?
There goes the GB adrenalin rush for the day.
We need to look for some shooting spree in the US or some suicide bombing in Europe.

no

they are BLIND

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Now QUOTE ASSANGE!!!

 

[xbb]

Now QUOTE ASSANGE!!!

watch the VIDEO

Furthermore, Assange claims the next leak will lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton. RT correspondent Laura Smith has the report from London.

Hillary

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Sorry.

I don't get my news by TV...



And much to your chagrin, from busybody neither.

BUT, I am keeping your lies bumped...

Bokonon would be pleased.



​

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

stfu nigger muslim lover!














In anticipation...