Why the hell is this news?

galaxygoddess

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Posts
563
The big debate: Suri v. Siloh


So basically they are debating on which baby has a better life... or is more spoiled or whatever the hell...

ARE THEY FUCKING KIDDING ME???

Who the hell cares???

There's starving children all over the world, disease, hunger, famine, WAR. WHY THE HELL do we care who SPOILS their damned little brats??????


DESK! Apply directly to forehead!
DESK! Apply directly to forehead!
DESK! Apply directly to forehead!
 
Why are they even debating. Tom Cruise's baby will commit suicide before long having to live with that moron.

On the other hand, Angelina can be my mommy any time :D
 
galaxygoddess said:
Who the hell cares???

There's starving children all over the world, disease, hunger, famine, WAR. WHY THE HELL do we care who SPOILS their damned little brats??????
Sadly, a lot of people care, many of whom are trying to escape from their own unhappy lives.
 
It's a joke!

Um...it's a JOKE damn it! Didn't you get that? The way it's formatted and debated *as if* it were a debate over FOOTBALL PLAYERS makes it a j-o-k-e. A Satire to be specific. As in "hahahahaha!" There's not a second of seriousness in this, so being appalled by it is ridiculous. They're making your point for you with SATIRE--that giving so much attention to a pair of rich babies is stupid.

And besides, they're both wrong. Daniellynn has it over both babies! :cool:
 
Jenny_Jackson said:
On the other hand, Angelina can be my mommy any time :D

I would actually much prefer Katie Holmes. Especially if the said couples both separate, since of the 4 parents she seems the least psycho. Have we forgotten that Angelina exchanged vials of blood with Billy Bob? Although Brad Pitt might not be so bad, since I'm not really up on his tabloid 411.
 
Jenny_Jackson said:
Why are they even debating. Tom Cruise's baby will commit suicide before long having to live with that moron.

On the other hand, Angelina can be my mommy any time :D
I fully agree...on both points :)
 
only_more_so said:
I would actually much prefer Katie Holmes. Especially if the said couples both separate, since of the 4 parents she seems the least psycho. Have we forgotten that Angelina exchanged vials of blood with Billy Bob? Although Brad Pitt might not be so bad, since I'm not really up on his tabloid 411.



o.0;;;


My boss gets these people magazines (and a couple of other tabliods) and they are sometimes good for a laugh and sometimes piss me off. One I really would like to sneak off and burn in effigey it the one with paris hilton on the front saying "my time behind bars" everytime I see it I want to deface it...


In any event, I'd like to put in a service order to the maker and ask for a full reboot, the system has become too corrupted and fragmented.


But that's just me >.>
 
galaxygoddess said:
o.0;;;


My boss gets these people magazines (and a couple of other tabliods) and they are sometimes good for a laugh and sometimes piss me off. One I really would like to sneak off and burn in effigey it the one with paris hilton on the front saying "my time behind bars" everytime I see it I want to deface it...


In any event, I'd like to put in a service order to the maker and ask for a full reboot, the system has become too corrupted and fragmented.


But that's just me >.>

Yeah, wouldn't it be nice if there was one channel that specialized in Tabloid jounalism, so that none of the other networks would have to cover that stuff? Sure there would be occasional overlaps, like at the Oscars, but the bias would be well understood. So if you wanted to know who's wearing what, go to the tabloid channel, if you want to know who won what, try one of the others.

And then there could be the crime channel. All they cover are the local/national crimes that have been committed. And there could be a "Good News" channel, that is all about the amazingly touching human interest stories.
 
Back
Top