Why the Democrat Press Lies…

Cap’n AMatrixca

Copper Top
Joined
Jul 5, 2005
Posts
59,697
I say Democrat since surveys continually demonstrate that big city papers and the national television media are dominated by employees who are registered Democrats. I know that some of you will counter with, “The owners are evil, money-grubbing Republicans, and the dollar determines the reporting,” and that, to me, is a ludicrous argument in that I view the situation as thus; a state department employee looks at the current administration as a temporary player with a bit part and so too does the reporter view the owner. The press is corrupt because it is dominated by a class of men and women whom do not wield power gracefully.

And this is how the corruption begins, as the pen calls out to its victims, “There is power in me!”

“The saddest thing is that Judge Posner's market determinism leaves no room for the other dynamics I've witnessed in my 35 years in newspapers: the idealism of reporters who think they can make the world better...”

Bill Keller, Executive Editor, NY Times

How many times have I pointed this out? The reporters not only shape the stories to fit their world purview, but they have a lemming-like mentality dominated by partisanship.
 
How about a recent photo...

Rush wears his partisanship on his sleeve. Big, big, big difference between him and a guy or doll claiming to be what they ain't: objective.
 
For example, Cindy, Crawford abandoned her protest so now the story is the protest sans Cindy, Crawford who suddenly had her Lewinsky moment and fled the scene without her all-important meeting with the devil...

:D ;) ;)
 
Meanwhile, CBS has obtained documents proving that George Bush along with Israel planned and executed the 9/11 attack.
 
Speaking of 9-11...

Anybody heard of a military secret op called Able-Danger that was able to warn the Clinton Administration about Atta's active Al Qaeda cell?

That's not much of a story, now is it?

;) ;)
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Speaking of 9-11...

Anybody heard of a military secret op called Able-Danger that was able to warn the Clinton Administration about Atta's active Al Qaeda cell?

That's not much of a story, now is it?

;) ;)

It would be, but it was BB. Before Bush.
 
Because of the under-reporting, both sides will continue to use the 9-11 Commission Report to bolster their claims to the throne of Scotland...


... just as if it were gospel truth.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Speaking of 9-11...

Anybody heard of a military secret op called Able-Danger that was able to warn the Clinton Administration about Atta's active Al Qaeda cell?

That's not much of a story, now is it?

;) ;)


The Lt. Col. who has been telling this story has been changing the story that he is telling.

Get your facts right.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_08/006945.php

SHAFFER AND THE 9/11 COMMISSION....One of the key allegations made by Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer in the Able Danger affair is that even though he specifically told the 9/11 Commission that Able Danger had identified Mohamed Atta, they failed to follow up on it. Today he recanted that allegation. Here's the chronology:

August 8: "[Shaffer] said he was among a group that briefed Mr. Zelikow and at least three other members of the Sept. 11 commission staff about Able Danger when they visited the Afghanistan-Pakistan region in October 2003. [Shaffer] said he had explicitly mentioned Mr. Atta as a member of a Qaeda cell in the United States."

August 12: "As with their other meetings, Commission staff promptly prepared a memorandum for the record. That memorandum, prepared at the time, does not record any mention of Mohamed Atta or any of the other future hijackers, or any suggestion that their identities were known to anyone at DOD before 9/11."

August 16: "Colonel Shaffer said that he had provided information about Able Danger and its identification of Mr. Atta in a private meeting in October 2003 with members of the Sept. 11 commission staff when they visited Afghanistan, where he was then serving."

August 19: "Shaffer conceded that during his own personal briefing of Sept. 11 commission staffers in Afghanistan in Oct. 2003, he didn't specifically name the terrorists. Instead, he detailed how Able Danger had uncovered information about three terror cells with the use of then-advanced data-mining techniques."​

Shaffer has been making the same claim for nearly two weeks, a claim that he repeated even after the 9/11 Commission had denied it. Today he had a change of heart.

Fine. But doesn't this also throw into doubt Shaffer's claim that Able Danger identified Atta prior to 9/11? After all, if Able Danger really did ID Atta — complete with a picture and his position in the al-Qaeda organization — it's awfully hard to believe that Shaffer wouldn't have mentioned that when he briefed the 9/11 Commission, isn't it?

Each date is an active link at that site.
 
WriterDom said:
Meanwhile, CBS has obtained documents proving that George Bush along with Israel planned and executed the 9/11 attack.

That's Zionists, not Israel.

Get your paranoia straight.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
How about a recent photo...

Rush wears his partisanship on his sleeve. Big, big, big difference between him and a guy or doll claiming to be what they ain't: objective.

Objective, SIN? Yer outed, mate....come up with a better plan.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
For example, Cindy, Crawford abandoned her protest so now the story is the protest sans Cindy, Crawford who suddenly had her Lewinsky moment and fled the scene without her all-important meeting with the devil...

:D ;) ;)

It never was about her - even you know this.
 
Yeah, somme, I've been saying the story was about the press and its desires from the git-go. They wish to re-create their one big shining victory, Vietnam.

And overthebow fulfils the prediction I made yesterday that if the story looks like it has legs they will go after the soldiers just as surely as if they were "Swifties..."
 
Somme said:
It never was about her - even you know this.


No, the Wingnuts on this board tank up on the Right Wing Nut echo chambers and then come vomit it up on GB.

This is one of the current memes in the RWN echo chambers: Cindy (note use of just the first name to belittle her) is a publicity whore.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Yeah, somme, I've been saying the story was about the press and its desires from the git-go. They wish to re-create their one big shining victory, Vietnam.

And overthebow fulfils the prediction I made yesterday that if the story looks like it has legs they will go after the soldiers just as surely as if they were "Swifties..."

Are ya ready to admit that Iraq is a quagmire yet, AJ?

If not, where's the exit strategery?
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Yeah, somme, I've been saying the story was about the press and its desires from the git-go. They wish to re-create their one big shining victory, Vietnam.

And overthebow fulfils the prediction I made yesterday that if the story looks like it has legs they will go after the soldiers just as surely as if they were "Swifties..."


Have another cup of coffee. Whatever you are drinking now isn't working......
 
I hesitate to point out, you ARE following the script over...

The FBI has perfected the tactic you make use of and the best example of its misuse is layed out in Dr. Wen Ho Lee's "My Country Against Me," as he details his railroading by the Clinton Administration. And that tactic is to ask to have the story repeated over and over and over and then pick at ANY minute variations as lies or deceits.

...

And Throb, when the troops I speak to say it's Vietnam, then it's Vietnam.

You are no where NEAR the theater of operations.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
And Throb, when the troops I speak to say it's Vietnam, then it's Vietnam.

You are no where NEAR the theater of operations.

I didn't say "Vietnam", I said "Quagmire".


And I suspect the only "troops" you converse with are Salvation Army troops: "More stew, mr. AJ?"
 
Again. Another perfect example of: We don't like the message so we go after the messenger and still you don't get why your team is on a losing streak.

You seem to be bereft of ideas...
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Again. Another perfect example of: We don't like the message so we go after the messenger and still you don't get why your team is on a losing streak.

You seem to be bereft of ideas...

Generation Y is coming, AJ, and boy are they pissed.....and Liberal, too.

They categorically reject your view of women as second-class citizens and gays as abnormal.

I see tough times for AJ-style politics of divide 'n conquer ahead.
 
Back
Top