After a recent display of hubritic ignorance on my part, a fellow
denizon of the board wrote me. She wanted to know what captured my
soul and led me to poetry. And, she wondered, what poets would I
recommend? I answered similarly to what follows here. As I finished
my note, the thought occured to me that these might make good topics
of discussion. Go for it. I know every one of you has an opinion.
Poetry does not need to grasp the soul or tug the heartstrings any
more or less than your favorite Clancy, King, or McCaffery novel; but
it can. Happy is an emotion; but fun poetry is looked down on. Why?
Read poetry for the same reward you would get from reading O. Henry's
The Ransom of Redchief, or Sartre's No
Exit. Read Limericks; laugh your ass off. Or, you can even
read this drivel;
(My Eng. Lit. instructor failed this. Said I wasn't serious enough
and didn't show the proper respect for Poetry.;={)
The field of poetry is 99&44/100 percent pure crap. That said, there
is good stuff out there. Consider a top one hundred songs of
(pick your decade). Maybe 50 of those really stand the test of time
and taste. There were more than 25,000 new songs released in that
period! Guess what? That's 99&80/100 percent crap. Keep in mind
that you probably liked and enjoyed several new songs each week at
that time. That's fine. They just didn't stand up to the test of time.
Many (P)oets seem to believe that if you don't like their stuff it's
because 'you just don't get it!' They believe that mere mechanics
shouldn't get in the way of 'soul.' They are serious-by-god-Poets.
Be careful, if you're going to say anything. It's not enough to
dislike the poem. You damn well better know why it doesn't work.
We are lucky. We have folks like The Unmasked Poet, daughter,
KillerMuffin and others who post as well, if not as often. These
critics know the nuts and bolts and can explain to the nuts about the
bolts. These people are the reason I come to the forii (I think
that's the objective plural--too long since Latin-I).
Poets worth reading? These represent to me the best of poetry. They
have withstood the test of time. You may notice the absence of the
likes of Shelley, Keats and others. That is because I think
they're boring. I cannot describe a greater waste of time than
reading Ode on a Grecian Urn. You may disagree. The
language of Shakespeare, Milton, etc. is too archaic for this essay.
So, in no particular order--
T. S. Eliot-- Nobel prize. The Love Song of J. Prufrock
is his best known work. See too The Wasteland and
The Hollow Men.
E. E. Cummings--probably second only to Frost as subject of literary
discussion. He can be very difficult to read. He does wonder-full
things with the language, so make the effort. Also an artist (painter
type) at least in part of the cubist school.
Ogden Nash--"serious critics" often denigrate as not serious enough.
Provides a light touch that can disguise a heavy subject. A master
craftsman. Do not miss. Pick 3 or 4 and memorize them. Then, recite
them as the mood strikes for the pleasure of speaking and hearing
them.
Lewis Carroll--mathematician, logician of renown, teacher, Sunday
school teacher, photographer (of prepubescent nudes!), and novelist.
This man's novels and poetry were written especially for children
(Alice in particular), but are full of political and social satire.
Maya Angelou--mostly politically correct pabulum, but at least you
will know what everyone's talking about. An example of the
artsy-fartsy school.
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow--If you read one last poem in your life, it
should be The Song of Hiawatha in its entirety. That
bit you read in school, "...stood the wigwam of Nokomis, daughter of
the moon, Nokomis...," is a small excerpt from part III. Longfellow
uses strict form (from a Norse edda, if I recall) with rhyme, meter,
repetition, and pro'bly lots of other things I don't know about. If
there is such a thing, Longfellow created the Great American Poem.
That's my story, and I'm sticking with it.
Robert Frost--maybe the most widely read American poet? Funny, while
I'm reading Frost, I enjoy it. Then, I have no particular desire to
read another one. What can I say? Still, an acknowledged master.
Rudyard Kipling--almost left him out (Oh, the shame!). Nobel Prize
winner. If you don't cry for Gunga Din, you have no heart. Who
hasn't read If--? Almost American, he lived some of his most
productive years in Vermont (Captains Courageous, eg.).
Any poet your taste and level of discrimination let you enjoy.
g
denizon of the board wrote me. She wanted to know what captured my
soul and led me to poetry. And, she wondered, what poets would I
recommend? I answered similarly to what follows here. As I finished
my note, the thought occured to me that these might make good topics
of discussion. Go for it. I know every one of you has an opinion.
Poetry does not need to grasp the soul or tug the heartstrings any
more or less than your favorite Clancy, King, or McCaffery novel; but
it can. Happy is an emotion; but fun poetry is looked down on. Why?
Read poetry for the same reward you would get from reading O. Henry's
The Ransom of Redchief, or Sartre's No
Exit. Read Limericks; laugh your ass off. Or, you can even
read this drivel;
Code:
I had an old dog,
His name was Pal.
I loved him more
Than any old gal.
If I didn't feed him,
He didn't care.
You couldn't hurt him
He was big as a bear.
Yes, I miss Pal
More than any old gal.
He turned on me,
And I had to shoot him.
(My Eng. Lit. instructor failed this. Said I wasn't serious enough
and didn't show the proper respect for Poetry.;={)
The field of poetry is 99&44/100 percent pure crap. That said, there
is good stuff out there. Consider a top one hundred songs of
(pick your decade). Maybe 50 of those really stand the test of time
and taste. There were more than 25,000 new songs released in that
period! Guess what? That's 99&80/100 percent crap. Keep in mind
that you probably liked and enjoyed several new songs each week at
that time. That's fine. They just didn't stand up to the test of time.
Many (P)oets seem to believe that if you don't like their stuff it's
because 'you just don't get it!' They believe that mere mechanics
shouldn't get in the way of 'soul.' They are serious-by-god-Poets.
Be careful, if you're going to say anything. It's not enough to
dislike the poem. You damn well better know why it doesn't work.
We are lucky. We have folks like The Unmasked Poet, daughter,
KillerMuffin and others who post as well, if not as often. These
critics know the nuts and bolts and can explain to the nuts about the
bolts. These people are the reason I come to the forii (I think
that's the objective plural--too long since Latin-I).
Poets worth reading? These represent to me the best of poetry. They
have withstood the test of time. You may notice the absence of the
likes of Shelley, Keats and others. That is because I think
they're boring. I cannot describe a greater waste of time than
reading Ode on a Grecian Urn. You may disagree. The
language of Shakespeare, Milton, etc. is too archaic for this essay.
So, in no particular order--
T. S. Eliot-- Nobel prize. The Love Song of J. Prufrock
is his best known work. See too The Wasteland and
The Hollow Men.
E. E. Cummings--probably second only to Frost as subject of literary
discussion. He can be very difficult to read. He does wonder-full
things with the language, so make the effort. Also an artist (painter
type) at least in part of the cubist school.
Ogden Nash--"serious critics" often denigrate as not serious enough.
Provides a light touch that can disguise a heavy subject. A master
craftsman. Do not miss. Pick 3 or 4 and memorize them. Then, recite
them as the mood strikes for the pleasure of speaking and hearing
them.
Lewis Carroll--mathematician, logician of renown, teacher, Sunday
school teacher, photographer (of prepubescent nudes!), and novelist.
This man's novels and poetry were written especially for children
(Alice in particular), but are full of political and social satire.
Maya Angelou--mostly politically correct pabulum, but at least you
will know what everyone's talking about. An example of the
artsy-fartsy school.
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow--If you read one last poem in your life, it
should be The Song of Hiawatha in its entirety. That
bit you read in school, "...stood the wigwam of Nokomis, daughter of
the moon, Nokomis...," is a small excerpt from part III. Longfellow
uses strict form (from a Norse edda, if I recall) with rhyme, meter,
repetition, and pro'bly lots of other things I don't know about. If
there is such a thing, Longfellow created the Great American Poem.
That's my story, and I'm sticking with it.
Robert Frost--maybe the most widely read American poet? Funny, while
I'm reading Frost, I enjoy it. Then, I have no particular desire to
read another one. What can I say? Still, an acknowledged master.
Rudyard Kipling--almost left him out (Oh, the shame!). Nobel Prize
winner. If you don't cry for Gunga Din, you have no heart. Who
hasn't read If--? Almost American, he lived some of his most
productive years in Vermont (Captains Courageous, eg.).
Any poet your taste and level of discrimination let you enjoy.
g