Why did Hitler hate jews?

[Mike_Yates]

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Did he have some kind of negative experience with one?

Has he ever explained himself?

 

[Queersetti]

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Did he have some kind of negative experience with one?

Has he ever explained himself?

Yeah, he called a press conference, but it was up against the last episode of Friends, so nobody watched.

 

[phrodeau]

It ran in his family.

 

[Darbhinder]

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Did he have some kind of negative experience with one?

Has he ever explained himself?

Same reason everyone else does.

 

[Christobal]

Well if you lose a world war and are humiliated, your economy has gone down the shitter and life just generally sucks. Elect me and I get all them jews that caused the problem. I will restore us to greatness.

This is a paradigm that has worked through all human history.

 

[pensivepoet]

Penis envy

 

[sr71plt]

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Did he have some kind of negative experience with one?

Has he ever explained himself?

This is the sort of question that always deserves an "I don't know; shall we call him and ask him?" answer.

 

[BettyPoop]

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Did he have some kind of negative experience with one?

Has he ever explained himself?

Why is one of Trump's foreign advisor picks, Joseph Schmitz, a Holocaust denier? His ratinale that the ovens were too small to kill six million Jews doesn't make sense. Maybe his not making sense is what attracted Trump to him?

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Hitler was an extreme German nationalist. German was his native tongue, and Austria was part of the German Empire. Think Britain and its Commonwealth. When World War erupted Hitler failed to get in Austria's army so he down the road and joined the German army, you can throw a rock from his Austrian home to Germany.

In the war he was a corporal and message runner from headquarters to combat units. He was shot at constantly but did the work and earned an Iron Cross for his courage. Any Jew with an Iron Cross was OK with Hitler. The Iron Cross cancelled the race problem. So he wasn't a real racist, he was an extreme ethnocentrist. And most people like their team more than your's, which is what ethnocentrism is.. Jews with Iron Crosses played for the right team.

Most Jews didn't. Most Jews avoided war service, stayed home, and prospered. At the end of the war the Jews had the money and best jobs and all the pretty girls. Jews were 1% of the German population but dominated the schools and government, the arts and sciences and law. Then Woodrow Wilson put a Jew (Walter Lippmann) in charge of designing the Versailles Treaty. And Lippmann fucked the Germans.

Hitler rose to power promising to end Jewish economic and political influence. Jews weren't happy about it, made trouble, and died in the millions.

 

[underguy1]

Fascism is the ruling class' counter attack to the natural popular gravitation to socialism when capitalism's internal contradictions and excesses inevitably cause poverty and hardship for the masses.

It's standard divide and conquer tactics.

 

[Que]

Fascism is the ruling class' counter attack to the natural popular gravitation to socialism when capitalism's internal contradictions and excesses inevitably cause poverty and hardship for the masses.

It's standard divide and conquer tactics.

You mean gravitation to plunder. Everyone likes frees stuff and no one really likes to work. Especially those least capable of understanding why that model is unsustainable and has not worked anywhere it has been tried.

 

[Que]

Well if you lose a world war and are humiliated, your economy has gone down the shitter and life just generally sucks. Elect me and I get all them jews that caused the problem. I will restore us to greatness.

This is a paradigm that has worked through all human history.

Same tactic that put Obama back in for 4 more years despite presiding over the most anemic recovery in history. Had he done, quite literally, nothing, the recovery would have been more robust.

"It's all the fault of the 1%ers!" What is modern code for Jews. Or in this case, a wealthy Mormon.

 

[underguy1]

You mean gravitation to plunder. Everyone likes frees stuff and no one really likes to work. Especially those least capable of understanding why that model is unsustainable and has not worked anywhere it has been tried.

That's just not true. Humans are social beings and working for your society is an integral part of human nature.

Socialism has worked everywhere it has been tried. That's why the capitalists work so hard to destroy it by whatever means wherever and whenever it raises its head.

The capitalist class are the greatest plunderers in human history.

But you probably don't understand either capitalism or socialism.

 

[Que]

That's just not true. Humans are social beings and working for your society is an integral part of human nature.

Socialism has worked everywhere it has been tried. That's why the capitalists work so hard to destroy it by whatever means wherever and whenever it raises its head.

The capitalist class are the greatest plunderers in human history.

But you probably don't understand either capitalism or socialism.

Oh, I get it. It is so "NOT" opposite day.

The ideas of Karl Marx has "NOT" caused more poverty, starvation, and death than any other in the not history of the world.

 

[underguy1]

Oh, I get it. It is so "NOT" opposite day.

The ideas of Karl Marx has "NOT" caused more poverty, starvation, and death than any other in the not history of the world.

Marx was a brilliant critic of capitalism. That's about it.

And no, Marxism (whatever that means) has done no such thing.

The world wars were capitalist adventures, old chap. Imperialism is a capitalist phenomena.

 

[Que]

Marx was a brilliant critic of capitalism. That's about it.

And no, Marxism (whatever that means) has done no such thing.

The world wars were capitalist adventures, old chap. Imperialism is a capitalist phenomena.

Of course. No country living under any other system of governance ever went to war, invaded their neighbors, of acted with agression. All peace, order and good government.

Always amusing to see people who don't understand the first thing about money much less economics praise the brilliance of Karl Marx or the other idiot, John Maynard Keynes.

No place large or small that has ever removed the incentive that profit is to productivity has ever seen an increase in actual productivity, because, duh.

Short term benefits reaped are simply spending of plundered capital. Eventually you run out of other people's capital to plunder.

 

[underguy1]

Of course. No country living under any other system of governance ever went to war, invaded their neighbors, of acted with agression. All peace, order and good government.

Moving the goal posts. That's clearly not what you said.

So you're retreating already.

Always amusing to see people who don't understand the first thing about money much less economics praise the brilliance of Karl Marx or the other idiot, John Maynard Keynes.

LOLz. I actually am an economist.

And I suspect you are a libertarian.

In which case, I will mock you mercilessly.

No place large or small that has ever removed the incentive that profit is to productivity has ever seen an increase in actual productivity, because, duh.

Short term benefits reaped are simply spending of plundered capital. Eventually you run out of other people's capital to plunder.

No place ever removed the profit motive, period.

Money is an accounting entity. It is virtual and infinite.

You don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Que]

No, you are clearly not an actual economist. If anything, tou, like Paul Krugman are paid to spout nonsense to give cover for nonsensical ideas about spending capital. Every locale needs a propaghandist like that in order to fleece tge public and continue tge feeding at tge public trough of those who directly profit from those expenditures mislabled as investments.

 

[underguy1]

No, you are clearly not an actual economist. If anything, tou, like Paul Krugman are paid to spout nonsense to give cover for nonsensical ideas about spending capital. Every locale needs a propaghandist like that in order to fleece tge public and continue tge feeding at tge public trough of those who directly profit from those expenditures mislabled as investments.

I have little to no respect for Krugman. I think he's probably much closer to you in ideological terms than me.

I don't know what 'spending capital' could possibly mean.

Can you be more specific?

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Fascism is the ruling class' counter attack to the natural popular gravitation to socialism when capitalism's internal contradictions and excesses inevitably cause poverty and hardship for the masses.

It's standard divide and conquer tactics.

Fascism is socialism, socialism with priorities. Its pragmatic socialism.

Do your goddamned homework, asshead.

 

[underguy1]

Fascism is socialism, socialism with priorities. Its pragmatic socialism.

Do your goddamned homework, asshead.

No it isn't. Fascism is an ideology that supports the ruling class.

It's about as opposite of socialism as it gets.

Grow a brain, dickhead.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why did Hitler hate Jews?

Did he have some kind of negative experience with one?

Has he ever explained himself?

He wrote a book explaining everything. Have you not read it?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No it isn't. Fascism is an ideology that supports the ruling class.

It's about as opposite of socialism as it gets.

Grow a brain, dickhead.

No it's just a variation on a theme of central planning and oligarchical control.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Marx was a brilliant critic of capitalism. That's about it.

And no, Marxism (whatever that means) has done no such thing.

The world wars were capitalist adventures, old chap. Imperialism is a capitalist phenomena.

You don't understand capitalism or imperialism. Imperialism refers to empire and monarchs. Capitalism is a system of production where a private owner controls...production.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Moving the goal posts. That's clearly not what you said.

So you're retreating already.



LOLz. I actually am an economist.

And I suspect you are a libertarian.

In which case, I will mock you mercilessly.



No place ever removed the profit motive, period.

Money is an accounting entity. It is virtual and infinite.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Yes, if you are Zimbabwe...

Money is as much a commodity as is wheat or labor. It is just more portable and is easier to trade with than taking four bushels of wheat to the butcher in exchange for a side of mutton.