ryan8558
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Posts
- 10,249
Of course there is yet another explanation, equally as onerous and disgusting. And this has to do with how the government spends the public's money and baseline budgeting.
Each government agency receives X amount of dollars each year for operations. Any unspent monies are returned to the treasury at the end of the fiscal year. This returned monies MAY have the effect of altering the next years appropriations for that agency. (Obviously not under the current 'continuing resolution' process that the government is operation under, but that can change and old habits die hard.) So each year there is a scramble by the various agencies to spend every single penny allocated. In the case where there is a projected surplus of dollars at the end of the fiscal year many of the agencies engage in what can only be called 'creative purchasing.' Each agency wants to make certain that they end the year with 0 balance on the books so as to bolster the argument that they need even more dollars for the coming fiscal year.
So all of these nonsensical purchases, of which guns and ammo are but a part, may be nothing more than the government agencies pissing away the public's money this year so they will have even more money to piss away next year.
The problem, of course, is that these nonsensical purchases become part of an ongoing program that the taxpayer must support ad infinitum.
Ishmael
That is quite possibly one of the reasons. The businesses I have worked for have done the same. If you don't spend your budgeted money for the year it will not be on the next year's budget. Then when the company wants to do a 5% cut of expenses you will be cutting 5% of the budget used and not the allocated budget.
Need to look at more of their spending, besides the excess ammo and the 2300 armored vehicles, to determine if this is the case though.
