WHY all the petty prissy HATRED of G. W. Bush?

[ullr]

I mean, it's not like you know the guy...It's no like he's abused the Constitution...It's not like he violated his oath of office like Clinton or Nixon...It'a not like he's a putz as Ford was, or a geeky fop like Carter, Hell! Bush's staff isn't even fractionally as elite as Clinton's was (only one Ivy Leaguer--Bush himself--versus dozens in the latter's)...

SO WHY THE HELL DO SO MANY "people" TAKE HIS EXISTENCE AS PERSONALLY OFFENSIVE?

--Orson, who didn't vote for Bush and only became a Republican because lawyer Jerome Zeifman, Dem House Council during Watergate, in Wall Street Journal (October 1996) reveled that Hillary had lied to him just to get Nixon, and that other shit was gonna hit the fan under her bovine husband's watch! Prescient old geezer...

 

[Guest]

 

[SINthysist]

Because the left HATES stupid people.
They HATE rich people.
They HATE anyone who gets ahead using family ties.
It's not petty and prissy.

It's REAL HATRED!

 

[Guest]

 

[Guest]

 

[SINthysist]

I forgot, the LEFT HATES rich white men who exploit minority ballplayers from third world countires by uprooting them from their homes, dropping them in the lap of luxury, and paying them millions of dollars to bat .211 'cause they got good glove...

Gawd forbid you make a dollar in that sort of thing!

 

[clit_licker30]

Because he is a real man. People get uncomfortable and someone that can see black and white.

The left gets really weird when they aren't in power.


"Liberalism ultimately leads to the abandonment of common sense." -The godfather Rush

 

[Johnny Mayberry]

Hmmmm...he's dumb, yet he's crafty...he's managed to get the 'liberal' media to give him a pass on his AWOL status and possible cocaine use, while attacking Al Gore's...facial hair? He's a political thug in the mold of Nixon. He's a prissy rich boy who honestly doesn't see his own faults...he thinks that because he pretends to be a good ole boy, that he is one. He has the same prep school and Ivy League education as the 'elitist' politicians he dislikes.
Also, he's only 'president' because he was passed up for baseball commisioner..and because he had the election fixed.

 

[SINthysist]

Where were you in the days before the election when a dirty trick blown-up by the press cost Bush a clear victory and allowed Algore to get within a lawsuit of the Presidency?

 

[Johnny Mayberry]

Where were you in the days before the election when a dirty trick blown-up by the press cost Bush a clear victory and allowed Algore to get within a lawsuit of the Presidency?

Where were you when Florida used faulty felon identification to keep thousands of legal voters from being eligible to vote? Where were you when Republican teams were sent to intimidate ballot counters? Or when illegal overseas ballots were counted in Bush's favor? Or, where were you when the Supreme Court rules for Bush, on the ground of not making any more trouble for him, instead of on any legal merit(not to mention that they made clear that no one else should EVER use their decision in this case as a precedent, that's how weak it was)

 

[Cuckolded_BlK_Male]

I mean, it's not like you know the guy...It's no like he's abused the Constitution...It's not like he violated his oath of office like Clinton or Nixon...It'a not like he's a putz as Ford was, or a geeky fop like Carter, Hell! Bush's staff isn't even fractionally as elite as Clinton's was (only one Ivy Leaguer--Bush himself--versus dozens in the latter's)...
:

Because he's a marginally retarded cocaine-snorting Blue-blood, who cheated his way through school, dodged the draft in the Vietnam era, stole an election, sent the economy into the toilet, got the WTC blown to bits, and is about to plunge us into WWIII. Is that enough?

Not to mention that he's from a family of crooks with ties to Nazi Germany (Prescott Bush Bert Walker), and the occult (Skull and Bones).

He should be dragged to the Hague in chains.

 

[Chloe Byrnes]

It's not so much 'hate him' as 'are baffled over how did a retard get to be President of anything other than his Monopoly gameboard bank' for the most part.

 

[busybody..]

It is worthwhile to note that many European "politicians" have been quoted........


"If Clinton would be in the White House, we would be supporting him!"

Any republican is reviled......The Libs hate conservatives......any excuse will do......

 

[clit_licker30]

Re: Re: WHY all the petty prissy HATRED of G. W. Bush?

Because he's a marginally retarded cocaine-snorting Blue-blood, who cheated his way through school, dodged the draft in the Vietnam era, stole an election, sent the economy into the toilet, got the WTC blown to bits, and is about to plunge us into WWIII. Is that enough?

Not to mention that he's from a family of crooks with ties to Nazi Germany (Prescott Bush Bert Walker), and the occult (Skull and Bones).

He should be dragged to the Hague in chains.

And what are you, Einstein? If you had the chance to fix all the problems, what would you do Einstein?

 

[Guest]

 

[clit_licker30]

Yes there are grownups in the Whitehouse now.

 

[SINthysist]

Where were you when Florida used faulty felon identification to keep thousands of legal voters from being eligible to vote? Where were you when Republican teams were sent to intimidate ballot counters? Or when illegal overseas ballots were counted in Bush's favor? Or, where were you when the Supreme Court rules for Bush, on the ground of not making any more trouble for him, instead of on any legal merit(not to mention that they made clear that no one else should EVER use their decision in this case as a precedent, that's how weak it was)

Without the former the latter becomes moot point dim bulb...

Where were you when algore did everything he could to disenfranchise the very people out in the desert preparing to put their lives on the line?

 

[miles]

Re: Re: WHY all the petty prissy HATRED of G. W. Bush?

Because he's a marginally retarded cocaine-snorting Blue-blood, who cheated his way through school, dodged the draft in the Vietnam era, stole an election, sent the economy into the toilet, got the WTC blown to bits, and is about to plunge us into WWIII. Is that enough?

Not to mention that he's from a family of crooks with ties to Nazi Germany (Prescott Bush Bert Walker), and the occult (Skull and Bones).

He should be dragged to the Hague in chains.

Pretty good for a retarded guy.

 

[Kuntmode]

n/a

It's not so much 'hate him' as 'are baffled over how did a retard get to be President of anything other than his Monopoly gameboard bank' for the most part.

Well said.

Applause.

Now when do you tell me the Chloe Byrnes story?

 

[Lost Cause]

Because they're the same type of people...

That were led through the October revolution, took the Czar's family into a basement, and killed them for what they represented. They are the types that killed all the old politicians, teachers, and policeman, and anyone labeled a "counter-revolutionary". That's just another term for "non-PC." People of a sociopathic nature hate anything that represents a higher moral value, and a vision of something greater than they have of what is correct. That's why they love anything that represents the lower moral standards of the elder nations, and of course, the Axis of Weasels.

 

[Don K Dyck]

Re: Re: WHY all the petty prissy HATRED of G. W. Bush?

Because he's a marginally retarded cocaine-snorting Blue-blood, who cheated his way through school, dodged the draft in the Vietnam era, stole an election, sent the economy into the toilet, got the WTC blown to bits, and is about to plunge us into WWIII. Is that enough?

Not to mention that he's from a family of crooks with ties to Nazi Germany (Prescott Bush Bert Walker), and the occult (Skull and Bones).

He should be dragged to the Hague in chains.

Hear, hear!! Well posted!!

 

[Don K Dyck]

Re: Because they're the same type of people...

That were led through the October revolution, took the Czar's family into a basement, and killed them for what they represented. They are the types that killed all the old politicians, teachers, and policeman, and anyone labeled a "counter-revolutionary". That's just another term for "non-PC." People of a sociopathic nature hate anything that represents a higher moral value, and a vision of something greater than they have of what is correct. That's why they love anything that represents the lower moral standards of the elder nations, and of course, the Axis of Weasels.

Yes . . . I remember . . . the Nazis (supported by Granddaddy Prescott Bush financial services) burnt the books . . . the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia, supported by the U$ government . . . killed the intellectual classes . . . yep!! sounds very American to me . . .

 

[Gord]

as an outsider he comes across as a bit of nice but dim - you know tries his best but never actualy makes it.

Statesman like qualities are not his strong suit. Also there is a bit of incredulity that just cause his name is Bush and he has milllions behind him he can become president - it demeans the status of the office.

I am always a bit amazed at the choice of people that make it tp President in recent years

Reagan, Clinton, Bush jnr .

I dunno he just doesnt give any aura of being a man you can feel safe that he will do the right thing

 

[Lost Cause]

And Clinton was a bargain....

The United States launched a war against a European nation largely at Clinton’s behest (no UN resolution). Clinton’s war against Serbia epitomized his moralism, his arrogance, his refusal to respect law, and his fixation on proving his virtue by using deadly force, regardless of how many innocent people died in the process.

Clinton claimed on March 24, 1999, that one purpose of bombing Serbia (including Kosovo) was “to deter an even bloodier offensive against innocent civilians in Kosovo and, if necessary, to seriously damage the Serbian military’s capacity to harm the people of Kosovo.” The CIA had warned the Clinton administration that if bombing was initiated, the Serbian army would greatly accelerate its efforts to expel ethnic Albanians. The White House disregarded this warning and feigned surprise when mass expulsions began.

Yet NATO Supreme Commander Gen. Wesley Clark said on March 26 that the upsurge in crackdowns on ethnic Albanians was “entirely predictable.” Since NATO had no ground forces in the area ready to intervene and since NATO planes stayed three miles above the ground to minimize pilot casualties, NATO could do nothing to stop the surge in ethnic cleansing. Violence spurred by the bombing was quickly invoked as the ultimate justification for the bombing.

The longer the bombing went on, the more brazenly NATO ignored the limits it had initially imposed on its targets in order to limit civilian casualties. In the final weeks of the 78-day war, all that mattered was finding new targets so that NATO spokesmen could continue their daily bragging about a “record number of sorties flown” and “record number of bombs dropped.” According to Human Rights Watch, at least 500 civilians were killed by NATO bombing; the Yugoslavian government claimed that 2,000 civilians were killed. NATO repeatedly dropped cluster bombs into marketplaces, hospitals, and other civilian areas.

As Serbian civilian casualties rose, purported Serbian atrocities mushroomed. On May 13, 1999, Clinton declaimed that “there are 100,000 people [in Kosovo] who are still missing” — clearly implying that they might have been slaughtered. Clinton also claimed that 600,000 ethnic Albanians could be “trapped within Kosovo itself, lacking shelter, short of food, afraid to go home, or buried in mass graves dug by their executioners.”

On April 15, 1999, Clinton opened a speech to newspaper editors by proclaiming the “stark contrast between a free society with a free press and a closed society where the press is used to manipulate people by suppressing or distorting the truth.” However, NATO consistently misrepresented its own actions. The Washington Post’s Bradley Graham noted on May 24, 1999, that Pentagon and NATO

briefings about the air operation have ... acquired a propaganda element aimed at demonizing Milosevic and his Belgrade government and imparting a moral imperative to the conflict. U.S. and NATO spokesmen, in scripts closely coordinated with the help of several public affairs specialists loaned by Washington to Brussels, routinely mix reports on allied strikes with fresh accusations of atrocities by Yugoslav forces.
Graham noted that the spokesmen routinely sought to delay admitting NATO responsibility for bombing civilians for “at least one news cycle or two before owning up to attacks gone awry.”

For Clinton, bombing Serbia was a triumph of idealism. The Washington Post reported that on the day after NATO planes bombed the Chinese embassy, “Clinton complained to British Prime Minister Tony Blair that news coverage was not fully presenting the moral dimensions of the war.” In the final days of the bombing, the Washington Post reported that “some presidential aides and friends are describing Kosovo in Churchillian tones, as Clinton’s ‘finest hour.’” The Post also reported that according to one Clinton friend “what Clinton believes were the unambiguously moral motives for NATO’s intervention represented a chance to soothe regrets harbored in Clinton’s own conscience.... The friend said Clinton has at times lamented that the generation before him was able to serve in a war with a plainly noble purpose, and he feels ‘almost cheated’ that ‘when it was his turn he didn’t have the chance to be part of a moral cause.’”


Clinton’s Kosovo peace

On June 10, 1999, NATO and the government of Yugoslavia reached an agreement to end the bombing. In his June 10 victory speech, Clinton proclaimed:

The demands of an outraged and united international community have been met. I can report to the American people that we have achieved a victory for a safer world, for our democratic values, and for a stronger America.... We have sent a message of determination and hope to all the world.... Because of our resolve, the 20th century is ending not with helpless indignation but with a hopeful affirmation of human dignity and human rights for the 21st century.

However, experts who compared the final surrender agreement with the Rambouillet text were surprised to see that NATO had dropped many of its most onerous demands from three months earlier. In a June 11 speech at an Air Force base, Clinton bragged: “Day after day, with remarkable precision, our forces pounded every element of Mr. Milosevic’s military machine, from tanks to fuel supply, to anti-aircraft weapons, to the military and political support.” Throughout the bombing campaign, NATO and Pentagon spokesmen gushed about the slaughter NATO was inflicting on the Serbian military.

However, once the bombing stopped, the Clinton administration was stunned to see the Serbian army withdraw in fine order with polished buttons and good morale. A confidential postwar U.S. military investigation concluded that the damage claims had been exaggerated nearly tenfold. In reality, only 14 tanks, 18 armored personnel carriers, and 20 artillery pieces were taken out, despite the claimed dropping of more than 20,000 bombs on the Serbian military.

On the other hand, NATO did have a very high “kill-rate” for the cardboard decoy tanks that the Serbs erected all over Kosovo. At the end of the war, the Serbian military largely was unscathed, but the country’s civilian infrastructure was in ruins. NATO bombs were far more effective against women, children, hospitals, and retirement homes than against soldiers.

After the peace agreement, NATO was plagued by a surplus of dead Serbian civilians and a severe shortage of dead ethnic Albanians. In late October, pathologist Emilio Perez Pujol, who headed a team of Spanish investigators in Kosovo, told The Times of London, “I calculate that the final figure of dead in Kosovo will be 2,500 at the most. This includes lots of strange deaths that can’t be blamed on anyone in particular.”

In a special videotape address to the Serbian people, Clinton declared,

I want you to understand that NATO only agreed to be peacekeepers on the understanding that its troops would ensure that both sides kept their commitments and that terrorism on both sides would be brought to an end. They only agreed to serve with the understanding that they would protect Serbs as well as ethnic Albanians and that they would leave when peace took hold.

In a Thanksgiving 1999 speech to American troops in Kosovo, Clinton proclaimed, “Thanks to you, we have reversed ethnic cleansing.” Clinton noted that there had been “almost one million refugees,” but “because we acted quicker [than in Bosnia], they all came home.” Clinton ignored the ongoing massive exodus of Serbs racing north for their lives. Jiri Dienstbier, the UN representative on human rights, declared in late 1999,
The spring ethnic cleansing of ethnic Albanians, accompanied by murders, torture, looting, and burning of houses, has been replaced by the autumn ethnic cleansing of Serbs, Romas [gypsies], Bosniaks, and other non-Albanians accompanied by the same atrocities.

One U.S. government official told the Washington Post in August 1999: “It looks like it’s over for the Serbs. We can talk about peace, love, and democracy, but I don’t think anyone really knows how to stop this.” A November 1999 report by the International Crisis Group concluded that “there are as many killings right now in Kosovo as there were before NATO intervened.”

Clinton also declared in November 1999 that the Kosovar children “love the United States ... because we gave them their freedom back.” Perhaps Clinton saw freedom as nothing more than being tyrannized by people of the same ethnicity. Once the bombing started, NATO transformed former terrorists into “freedom fighters” — a term explicitly used in the June 1999 agreement between the NATO and the KLA. As the Serbs were driven out of Kosovo, Kosovar Albanians became increasingly oppressed by the KLA, which ignored its commitment to disarm.

In his 1999 talk to troops in Kosovo, Clinton bragged, “You just look around this room today. We just celebrated Thanksgiving, with, I bet you, conservatively, 25 different ethnic groups represented among the American military forces here in this room — maybe 50, maybe it’s more.”

Clinton’s standard of virtue seemed to consist of little more than ethnic bean counting: the greater the number of ethnic groups, the greater the virtue. He talked as if every bomb dropped was a triumph for multiculturalism and diversity.
He was far more concerned with counting the number of ethnic groups at dinner than in noticing the ongoing purge of the Serbs. Since the United States promised to bring peace to Kosovo, Clinton bears some responsibility for every burnt church, every murdered Serbian grandmother, every new refugee column streaming north out of Kosovo. Despite these problems, Clinton bragged at a December 8, 1999, press conference that he was “very, very proud” of what the United States had done in Kosovo.

 

[p_p_man]

It is worthwhile to note that many European "politicians" have been quoted........


"If Clinton would be in the White House, we would be supporting him!"

Any republican is reviled......The Libs hate conservatives......any excuse will do......

When? Who? Where?

Naahh...you're making that up...

ppman