DVS
A ghost from your dreams
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2002
- Posts
- 11,416
Please note:
Before I get started, I won't mention any names or locations. If anyone knows where I live or knows of these situations, please refrain from mentioning the location. I don't want to give this man any more problems to deal with. Enough damage has been done. As far as I will go with the location is it's the midwest. I am sure there are gay haters who have access to this forum.
OK...
A few weeks ago, one of the well established TV news shows here in my town started scooping the other news broadcasts. They started mentioning the names of the hospitals where victims of violent crimes had been taken.
In the past, this has been an unwritten agreement among news broadcasts not to further victimize the victim or possibly the hospital personnel.
The hospitals in town have come together and spoken against this TV station, but the station has said they will continue with this practice. They said they have broken no laws, and the public has a right to know the facts.
Just a week ago, in a nearby town, a gay male was beaten severely when several unknowns were lying in wait for him to come out of an establishment. His jaw was broken, broke an eye socket, and he lost some teeth. His jaw is now wired shut.
This is the third time something of this nature has happened to him. Obviously, there is a group organizing against him and other gays.
But, this is only part of the story. Yesterday, the local paper decided to publish his picture. Why this was done is unknown, but it surely was an oversight of the publisher.
Think of the problems this could now cause for the victim. The town in question is not that large, and there are other dangerous facts I can't go into, or I would give away too much.
But, he is already a targeted gay male of at least one hate group, and now he has his picture in the paper for others to see and to possibly victimize even more.
My question is this...
Who's rights are more important? Is it that important to scoop the other news broadcasts with something that could jeopardize the very life of someone? Is it just for the ratings?
And, why would any news paper feel the necessity to publish the picture of a victim of any hate crime? I had hoped the world was becoming more tolerant. I guess I'm wrong.
Before I get started, I won't mention any names or locations. If anyone knows where I live or knows of these situations, please refrain from mentioning the location. I don't want to give this man any more problems to deal with. Enough damage has been done. As far as I will go with the location is it's the midwest. I am sure there are gay haters who have access to this forum.
OK...
A few weeks ago, one of the well established TV news shows here in my town started scooping the other news broadcasts. They started mentioning the names of the hospitals where victims of violent crimes had been taken.
In the past, this has been an unwritten agreement among news broadcasts not to further victimize the victim or possibly the hospital personnel.
The hospitals in town have come together and spoken against this TV station, but the station has said they will continue with this practice. They said they have broken no laws, and the public has a right to know the facts.
Just a week ago, in a nearby town, a gay male was beaten severely when several unknowns were lying in wait for him to come out of an establishment. His jaw was broken, broke an eye socket, and he lost some teeth. His jaw is now wired shut.
This is the third time something of this nature has happened to him. Obviously, there is a group organizing against him and other gays.
But, this is only part of the story. Yesterday, the local paper decided to publish his picture. Why this was done is unknown, but it surely was an oversight of the publisher.
Think of the problems this could now cause for the victim. The town in question is not that large, and there are other dangerous facts I can't go into, or I would give away too much.
But, he is already a targeted gay male of at least one hate group, and now he has his picture in the paper for others to see and to possibly victimize even more.
My question is this...
Who's rights are more important? Is it that important to scoop the other news broadcasts with something that could jeopardize the very life of someone? Is it just for the ratings?
And, why would any news paper feel the necessity to publish the picture of a victim of any hate crime? I had hoped the world was becoming more tolerant. I guess I'm wrong.