When the Russian hacking story dies what will be the Dems next fantasy?

water505

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Posts
4,517
They're frantically scrambling for a "Plan D" as we speak. Melania's suspicious Eastern European heritage fits right in with the whole Trump Loves Russia meme. She could easily be a spy. Maybe her great tits are filled with explosives the Russians will detonate by remote control at Trump's first cabinet meeting.
 
Trump's impeachment over his close ties with Russia and the fact that he did not go after the Dem operative who provided the leaked emails...

How do I know this?

After Bush assumed office, Laurel wanted him impeached over the missing Ws. Either they were never missing or he let the culprits get by with no punishment, both equally impeachable events...

;) ;) :cool:
 
Regardless of what the story is a certain segment of the population (cough, cough) will lap it up like a hungry puppy.
 
Get ready for a steady diet of fake news from MSM.

Fake news goes way back to 1900 or so. New writers got together at saloons and made it up. All reported the same stories and the public bought it. About the same time JP Morgan and others conspired to manipulate Wall Street. We got the 1907 Crash and Roosevelt used the crisis to create the IRS and Income Taxes to punish Morgan et al by taqxing the working class.

Look for bull shit drama all the time.
 
Fake news goes way back to 1900 or so. New writers got together at saloons and made it up. All reported the same stories and the public bought it. About the same time JP Morgan and others conspired to manipulate Wall Street. We got the 1907 Crash and Roosevelt used the crisis to create the IRS and Income Taxes to punish Morgan et al by taqxing the working class.

Cite? For any of that?
 
I dunno maybe:

Hopes:
Objections to Electoral Votes causing state votes tossed out, letting the House elect the President.
Impeachment.
Military Coup by Obama appointed Generals.
Popular Revolt.

based on:
Russian hacking.
Foreign investments.
Family favoritism.
Impulse decisions.
Civil unrest.
 
I'm glad he's sure that they are coincidences.

;) ;)

Isn't it always better to engage in dialog rather than acrimony?
 
Would that be why you didn't notice he didn't quote your predictions, only your "history" lesson?

Given that he did not directly respond to Oreo, how could you possibly divine what he did, or did not notice?
 
Trump's impeachment over his close ties with Russia and the fact that he did not go after the Dem operative who provided the leaked emails...

How do I know this?

After Bush assumed office, Laurel wanted him impeached over the missing Ws. Either they were never missing or he let the culprits get by with no punishment, both equally impeachable events...

;) ;) :cool:

SUCH A PETTY LITTLE RENT A GOOKER.
 
It's really kinda frightening how many people wouldn't care if Russia hired mercenaries to enter the US and attack the RNC and DNC headquarters and state political organization headquarters.
 
It's really kinda frightening how many people wouldn't care if Russia hired mercenaries to enter the US and attack the RNC and DNC headquarters and state political organization headquarters.

Why would they do that to begin with? What advantage would that give anyone?
 
Because I can follow a thread. :rolleyes:

Except you can't. You were responding to 4st comment, which ignored Oreo's edit. JBJ didn't bite. JBJs general comment about Oreo stands alone.

So short of you being a mind-reader you have no idea wheter jbj did or did not notice Oreo's edit.
 
It's really kinda frightening how many people wouldn't care if Russia hired mercenaries to enter the US and attack the RNC and DNC headquarters and state political organization headquarters.

How many?

Cite?

Who polled that?

I assume you're aware that the US government under both Democratic and Republican administrations have done far worse than that to influence elections in other coumtries?
 
How many?

Cite?

Who polled that?

I assume you're aware that the US government under both Democratic and Republican administrations have done far worse than that to influence elections in other coumtries?

Taking out a political party headquarters doesn't really do much of anything other than piss people off. At least in this country.
It's not like the candidates hang out there and losing some staff members isn't going to change ideology in any significant way.
 
Taking out a political party headquarters doesn't really do much of anything other than piss people off. At least in this country.
It's not like the candidates hang out there and losing some staff members isn't going to change ideology in any significant way.

I was thinking today that except for the fact that the plumbers were not alleged to be Russian, what we have here is a Watergate break-in with actual work product from Watergate disseminated.

If the roles were reversed Democrats would have zero problem with embarrassing Trump emails. They had zero problems with an illegal recording of Romney talking about how 47% of the country has no interest in hearing about tax cuts because they don't pay any and wouldn't vote for Romney in any case on the basis of tax policy.

The arguably clever (in a stupid clever sort of way) thrust oc all this is the Democrats are essentially feeding headlines, hoping that the general public will conflate the well known, well in advance of yhe election allegation prior that the Russians may have had a hand in the emails being released with actual hacking of the polling stations.

Whether it is important or not that the source of our underdtanding of Hillary's perfidy or is not important... has already been litigated in the court of public opinion by the only people that matter in the only states that mattered. They voted that it doesn't matter.
 
I was thinking today that except for the fact that the plumbers were not alleged to be Russian, what we have here is a Watergate break-in with actual work product from Watergate disseminated.

If the roles were reversed Democrats would have zero problem with embarrassing Trump emails. They had zero problems with an illegal recording of Romney talking about how 47% of the country has no interest in hearing about tax cuts because they don't pay any and wouldn't vote for Romney in any case on the basis of tax policy.

The arguably clever (in a stupid clever sort of way) thrust oc all this is the Democrats are essentially feeding headlines, hoping that the general public will conflate the well known, well in advance of yhe election allegation prior that the Russians may have had a hand in the emails being released with actual hacking of the polling stations.

Whether it is important or not that the source of our underdtanding of Hillary's perfidy or is not important... has already been litigated in the court of public opinion by the only people that matter in the only states that mattered. They voted that it doesn't matter.

The scenario given isn't like Watergate tho, it's mercs attacking the headquarters. Far cry from breaking in and stealing some paperwork or even hacking in and stealing emails. It's murder and mayhem with no real prize at the end.
 
Back
Top