May it be suggested that neither you or amicus are making asses out of yourselves. Amicus has an excellent point of view and you Mr. Liar have every duty and right to challenge amicus' point of view.
To make any headway on the issue of abortion, we must decide when life begins. Biologically we all know the zygote cell is biologically alive. The religious question must then be settled. Is life a spiritual quality in addition to a biological quality? Do we know for sure whether life is or is not a spiritual quality? To ask this question again we must decide what is a spiritual quality?
To me it is self-evident that a spiritual quality is rationality, something that appears to be unique to human beings. It appears that only human beings are able to say or think that "I think, therefore, I am." Man has this quality of self awareness but when is this spiritual quality aware of itself?
The traditional Jewish and Christian point of view is that man becomes a living soul when God breaths into man the breath of life.
Quote:
Gen:2:7: And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
This verse does not help very much because it does not tell us when the breath of life enters the body. It is well known that embryos respond to stimuli while in the womb. It is accepted by most religious people that Jesus Christ was alive before birth. What is not answered in these questions is when does a zygote or embryo receive the brith of life? Does a zygote meet the criteria for life by being rational? Does the potential for reasoning satisfy the requirement for life? Personally, we think it does.
Science has determined that without oxygen, human life is not possible. Science has determined there are all types of dysfunctional states in humans that are deprived of oxygen. We think science and faith agree here that life is not possible without oxygen, thus then, are we not forced to conclude that life beings at conception? We are sure that some are able to postulate why this would be a faulty conclusion. We would be interested in hearing how you would reason differently on this matter.
__________________
To make any headway on the issue of abortion, we must decide when life begins. Biologically we all know the zygote cell is biologically alive. The religious question must then be settled. Is life a spiritual quality in addition to a biological quality? Do we know for sure whether life is or is not a spiritual quality? To ask this question again we must decide what is a spiritual quality?
To me it is self-evident that a spiritual quality is rationality, something that appears to be unique to human beings. It appears that only human beings are able to say or think that "I think, therefore, I am." Man has this quality of self awareness but when is this spiritual quality aware of itself?
The traditional Jewish and Christian point of view is that man becomes a living soul when God breaths into man the breath of life.
Quote:
Gen:2:7: And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
This verse does not help very much because it does not tell us when the breath of life enters the body. It is well known that embryos respond to stimuli while in the womb. It is accepted by most religious people that Jesus Christ was alive before birth. What is not answered in these questions is when does a zygote or embryo receive the brith of life? Does a zygote meet the criteria for life by being rational? Does the potential for reasoning satisfy the requirement for life? Personally, we think it does.
Science has determined that without oxygen, human life is not possible. Science has determined there are all types of dysfunctional states in humans that are deprived of oxygen. We think science and faith agree here that life is not possible without oxygen, thus then, are we not forced to conclude that life beings at conception? We are sure that some are able to postulate why this would be a faulty conclusion. We would be interested in hearing how you would reason differently on this matter.
__________________