When "Climate Change" just doesn't cut it any more

[OldJourno]

The progressives in charge of terrifying you into believing the world will end in 12 years (or less) if you don't buy into a massive wealth transfer plan are desperate.
Global warming just barely got your attention.
Now it's climate change. That sounds even more benign, so it doesn't work even though it allows alarmists to use every storm as proof something sinister is afoot with the world's weather.
So we're going to be hit with a new catch phrase, such as climate catastrophe or climate cataclysm or climate orgasmo. A final decision hasn't been made yet. The politburo will decide soon.
As true believers, I think we should do our part an offer suggestions.
Submit your ideas here.

Here are a few of my own that I think convey a sense of urgency:
Climate ohmyfuckingod!
Climate Jesus Fucking Christ!
Climate We All Gonna Die! (This would be more appropriate for primary school curricula).

Climate Bullshit (this one's for the skeptics)

 

[Conager]

The good folks in the advertising business that brought you such disingenuous Logan's as GMC is professional-grade.

In the Soviet Union according to Martin Cruz Smith, the life of an advertising wonk is futile. If you have to advertise something in the Soviet Union it obviously wasn't any good.

Same thing applies here.

 

[OldJourno]

The good folks in the advertising business that brought you such disingenuous Logan's as GMC is professional-grade.

In the Soviet Union according to Martin Cruz Smith, the life of an advertising wonk is futile. If you have to advertise something in the Soviet Union it obviously wasn't any good.

Same thing applies here.

One of the best parts of Gorky Park was when the party official was showing off the washing machine (maybe it was a dryer). His cynicism about having something that didn't work that his wife could show off with pride was hilarious.
Global warming would be welcome in Moscow. Why did they change to climate change?

 

[trysail]

I am gobsmacked. It's the most amazing thing I've ever seen.


"Journalists" are engaged in a brazen, outright, organized effort to disseminate climate propaganda and bend the news.


You don't believe it? Have a look at this:
https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/covering-climate-now-170-outlets.php
(Columbia Journalism Review)



And you thought "journalism" was supposed to be non-partisan, honest and objective.

The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics clearly states,

first and foremost:

“Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.”​

And specifically directs journalists to:

Label advocacy and commentary​

​

​

 

[OldJourno]

I am gobsmacked. It's the most amazing thing I've ever seen.


"Journalists" are engaged in a brazen, outright, organized effort to disseminate climate propaganda and bend the news.


You don't believe it? Have a look at this:
https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/covering-climate-now-170-outlets.php
(Columbia Journalism Review)



And you thought "journalism" was supposed to be non-partisan, honest and objective.

The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics clearly states,

​

​

​

Years ago I actually subscribed to Columbia Journalism Review and read it cover to cover. "Journalism" has changed a lot since the late 1970s.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Climate Catastrophe




Has a nice ring to it...

 

[bellisarius]

I am gobsmacked. It's the most amazing thing I've ever seen.


"Journalists" are engaged in a brazen, outright, organized effort to disseminate climate propaganda and bend the news.


You don't believe it? Have a look at this:
https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/covering-climate-now-170-outlets.php
(Columbia Journalism Review)



And you thought "journalism" was supposed to be non-partisan, honest and objective.

The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics clearly states,

​

​

​

And that didn't work either. *chuckle*

 

[Conager]

I am gobsmacked. It's the most amazing thing I've ever seen.


"Journalists" are engaged in a brazen, outright, organized effort to disseminate climate propaganda and bend the news.


You don't believe it? Have a look at this:
https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/covering-climate-now-170-outlets.php
(Columbia Journalism Review)



And you thought "journalism" was supposed to be non-partisan, honest and objective.

The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics clearly states,









​

​

They think their advocacy is advocating for the "truth" as defined as that which is necessary to peddle to get the society to believe what it "should."

Rather never backed down. His documentation for the story was a fraud, but he insists it is "true."

 

[JohnnySavage]

I'm 56 - too old to worry too much about such things.

But I'm a firm believer in letting the 20 and 30 somethings figure out what kind of society and culture they want to preside over.

 

[SpeareChucker]

I'm 56 - too old to worry too much about such things.

But I'm a firm believer in letting the 20 and 30 somethings figure out what kind of society and culture they want to preside over.

Lord of the Flies

 

[JohnnySavage]

Lord of the Flies

Eh... it's always something.

My generation inherited a shit show, from the environment to the cold war, from the "greatest generation." We fixed most of it, but left a huge debt for the next generation. They will either step up and fix that, or they wont.

 

[Conager]

Inflation will fix it whether they like it or not.

All of these expensive remediation ideas for the climate scare, as well as any industry killing restrictions will exacerbate there inevitable financial problems.

Couple that with the refusal for any generation to do anything about social security while our birth rate is dropping, and they would be much better off dying in a climate catastrophe.

 

[JohnnySavage]

Inflation will fix it whether they like it or not.

All of these expensive remediation ideas for the climate scare, as well as any industry killing restrictions will exacerbate there inevitable financial problems.

Couple that with the refusal for any generation to do anything about social security while our birth rate is dropping, and they would be much better off dying in a climate catastrophe.

"Expensive" implies there's money to be made. Industries come and go; always have, always will. Henry Ford destroyed the buggy whip manufacturers but Studebaker Brothers shifted from carriage making to auto making. Same thing is happening now: BP is one of the largest solar panel producers and Execleon is one of the largest wind turbine operators.

Social Security is an easy fix - eliminate the cap on contributions.

 

[Conager]

Those currently over the cap would simply not report any "income."

That kind of thinking is exactly why our Healthcare System is as expensive as it is the income tax tried for confiscatory rates and everyone went to benefits instead of income. That's the only reason why health insurance is coupled to employment.

They're making solar panels and wind turbines because Uncle sugar is still subsidizing them at the expense of future Generations as we've already discussed.

Solar and wind requires redundancy. You have to have the exact same number of kilowatts available when they are offline. Which means you still have to have the same amount of capital expenditure for your non-renewable energy plants as if you had no solar and wind. so the entire thing is a complete waste of national assets. If your grid happens to need a lot of on-peak demand when the sun happens to be shining you can benefit somewhat from solar.

 

[seeshelly]

Climaxastrophe!!!

The progressives in charge of terrifying you into believing the world will end in 12 years (or less) if you don't buy into a massive wealth transfer plan are desperate.
Global warming just barely got your attention.
Now it's climate change. That sounds even more benign, so it doesn't work even though it allows alarmists to use every storm as proof something sinister is afoot with the world's weather.
So we're going to be hit with a new catch phrase, such as climate catastrophe or climate cataclysm or climate orgasmo. A final decision hasn't been made yet. The politburo will decide soon.
As true believers, I think we should do our part an offer suggestions.
Submit your ideas here.

Here are a few of my own that I think convey a sense of urgency:
Climate ohmyfuckingod!
Climate Jesus Fucking Christ!
Climate We All Gonna Die! (This would be more appropriate for primary school curricula).

Climate Bullshit (this one's for the skeptics)

There is no word in the English language that covers the full scope of horror and suffering that is coming if we don't all vote for leftists that will gives us all free everything and change the temperature of the earth as a bonus.

So, I think we need to actually coin a new word. And I think that new words needs to be... Climaxastrophe!!! The new word must ALWAYS be used with three exclamation marks.