What's next? Sputnik?

shereads

Sloganless
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Posts
19,242
Radioactive KGB spy plots? Whoa. Time warp.

It's a genuinely scary business, but it's also so Boris and Natasha, I keep expecting CNN to report that the case has been solved by a moose and squirrel.



Remember when GWB met Boris Yeltsin and new he could be trusted because he saw it in his eyes? Could that have been indigestion?
 
I could tell you, but I'd have to take you in.

(Do you use Photoshop? Recommended by KGB spies everywhere.)
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
I could tell you, but I'd have to take you in.

(Do you use Photoshop? Recommended by KGB spies everywhere.)

No. I have Photoshop Elements (Photoshop for Dummies) but it isn't dumbed-down enough for my attention span.

I use ImageShack for image hosting, and until recently it's worked fine on Lit, in the forums and sigs. I don't know why it's not working now.

Hmm...Maybe websites are using special filters now, to detect and eliminate those of us who only use their free services and never upgrade to the optional paid features. That would suck.
 
shereads said:
No. I have Photoshop Elements (Photoshop for Dummies) but it isn't dumbed-down enough for my attention span.

I use ImageShack for image hosting, and until recently it's worked fine on Lit, in the forums and sigs. I don't know why it's not working now.

Hmm...Maybe websites are using special filters now, to detect and eliminate those of us who only use their free services and never upgrade to the optional paid features. That would suck.


I don't know. I'm still using the cheap and free Photoshop.

:D
 
I always keep my umbrella tip loaded with cyanide, just in case. You never know.
 
"Boris, is Moose you said you killed in previous episode!"

~ Natasha Fatale
 
shereads said:
How did you do that, fearless leader? I've been using ImageShack to post images here, but when I tried it today I got a display that said hotlinks have been "disabled for this domain."

Is this some Russian spy trick?

[/threadjack]

Imageshack has banned any hotlinking to Literotica acording to the fine print in their Terms Of Service agreement than forbids linking any image hosted there to "a site that includes pornographic content."

As of last weekend, they began enforcing that clause against Literotica -- and apparently disabled all hotlinking from their site by anyone who had images hotlinked to Literotica while they got the site specific hotlinking in place.

Photobucket -- whre the image of Natasha and Boris is hosted -- doesn't ban sites wholesale. Yet. I've seen acouple of people complain that explicit images have been deleted by photobucket for violating their "no porn" clause but they don't seem to care where images are hotlinked, just what the image contains.
 
Casino Royale recounts the beginning of James Bond.

A Good Shepherd opens soon recounting the founding of the CIA.

More evidence for you Shereads.
 
Weird Harold said:
Imageshack has banned any hotlinking to Literotica acording to the fine print in their Terms Of Service agreement than forbids linking any image hosted there to "a site that includes pornographic content."

As of last weekend, they began enforcing that clause against Literotica -- and apparently disabled all hotlinking from their site by anyone who had images hotlinked to Literotica while they got the site specific hotlinking in place.

Photobucket -- whre the image of Natasha and Boris is hosted -- doesn't ban sites wholesale. Yet. I've seen acouple of people complain that explicit images have been deleted by photobucket for violating their "no porn" clause but they don't seem to care where images are hotlinked, just what the image contains.

The photobucket policy makes a hell of a lot more sense than the imageshack one. Who cares where it's shown if the image itself is devoid of porn?
 
Back
Top