Angeline
Poet Chick
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Posts
- 27,349
I love our fearless kitty mama, Laurel. She has consistently supported poetry at Lit when, unlike stories, it's obviously not the big draw to the site. That's admirable.
I have a question though about the Most Influential Poet Award, and I'm interested in hearing what you all think. I'll post a link to this thread in the "Nominations Discussion" thread in the Awards Forum, too.
**************************
My question is this--
What does Most Influential mean? Does it mean the person the nominator (or voter once nominations are announced) thinks writes the best poems? Is it the person who, talented poet or not in the voter's opinion, does the most for poetry at Lit over the course of the award year (e.g., sends feedback, is supportive and active on the forum, and so on)? Maybe it's a combination of the two or something else.
I think it's a combination myself. There is not a single poet nominated for the award this year whose poetry is weak, imo. But there are folks nominated who have only posted a few poems and/or have rarely been in the forum. I mean to take nothing from anyone nominated and am grateful for this incentive at all--nor do I think that participation in this forum need be a prerequisite for an award. Still it seems sort of unfair to me to put someone who posted a poem or two in 2003 (wonderful as that poem may be) up against someone who shows a commitment to poetry on this site every day.
Maybe there should be two special categories for poetry--most influential and best, since those two qualities are not likely found in a single person. I ask with respect for all involved with poetry at Lit--active board members or not.
So what do you all think? Please vote and offer comments.
I have a question though about the Most Influential Poet Award, and I'm interested in hearing what you all think. I'll post a link to this thread in the "Nominations Discussion" thread in the Awards Forum, too.
**************************
My question is this--
What does Most Influential mean? Does it mean the person the nominator (or voter once nominations are announced) thinks writes the best poems? Is it the person who, talented poet or not in the voter's opinion, does the most for poetry at Lit over the course of the award year (e.g., sends feedback, is supportive and active on the forum, and so on)? Maybe it's a combination of the two or something else.
I think it's a combination myself. There is not a single poet nominated for the award this year whose poetry is weak, imo. But there are folks nominated who have only posted a few poems and/or have rarely been in the forum. I mean to take nothing from anyone nominated and am grateful for this incentive at all--nor do I think that participation in this forum need be a prerequisite for an award. Still it seems sort of unfair to me to put someone who posted a poem or two in 2003 (wonderful as that poem may be) up against someone who shows a commitment to poetry on this site every day.
Maybe there should be two special categories for poetry--most influential and best, since those two qualities are not likely found in a single person. I ask with respect for all involved with poetry at Lit--active board members or not.
So what do you all think? Please vote and offer comments.

Last edited: