What Size Is Big Tits?

Mooncrack

Loves Spam
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Posts
63
I see ads about people looking for "Big" tits. But what size do they mean when they say big tit? Just to say big tits is meaningless. Some might think that size BB is big tits while others might think that HHH would be big tits, or "no size to big". I am kind of in the "no size to big" category.
So if you are advertising for "big" tits always state cup size.
 
It's all in the eye of the beholder. Or if your advertising your size, be specific...;)
 
No clue…must be pretty small and imaginary me thinks. Or a typo on the OPs part. Or that imaginary size B and C. 😉
 
I see ads about people looking for "Big" tits. But what size do they mean when they say big tit? Just to say big tits is meaningless.
Let's be honest, these people would be happy with any tits at all. Nothing wrong with going for responders who think they have big tits, but I doubt the advertisers would turn away a woman whose chest isn't quite as big as they hoped for.
 
Let's be honest, these people would be happy with any tits at all. Nothing wrong with going for responders who think they have big tits, but I doubt the advertisers would turn away a woman whose chest isn't quite as big as they hoped for.
Honestly, advertising that a quality they seek in a woman is ‘big tits’ is not going to get a response from any woman. Except perhaps someone looking to sell pics/time etc.
 
Honestly, advertising that a quality they seek in a woman is ‘big tits’ is not going to get a response from any woman. Except perhaps someone looking to sell pics/time etc.
Now I have that feeling we guys always get when we're just a hair shy of the truest insight!
 
Chuckles...love signatures.....

50ish, West Coast bicurious salty bitch with great tits.
Off the market, but friendly as fuck if you aren’t a misogynist dumbass.
 
None actually. Just thought it was humorous after your post of:

"Is it a shocking bit of insight that women might prefer being spoken to as people, rather than as tits?"

And then noticing your signature.

For me, it, was humorous, that's all. :)
 
I don't believe I see it as a joke, just ironic, I guess. No offense.

You replied in the thread...

"Is it a shocking bit of insight that women might prefer being spoken to as people, rather than as tits?"

Then I noticed your sig...

"50ish, West Coast bicurious salty bitch with great tits."

So I read it as you preferring folks didn't refer to you (women) as tits, and a signature, somewhat promoting yourself as a set of tits. Sorry I mentioned it.
 
I don't believe I see it as a joke, just ironic, I guess. No offense.

You replied in the thread...

"Is it a shocking bit of insight that women might prefer being spoken to as people, rather than as tits?"

Then I noticed your sig...

"50ish, West Coast bicurious salty bitch with great tits."

So I read it as you preferring folks didn't refer to you (women) as tits, and a signature, somewhat promoting yourself as a set of tits. Sorry I mentioned it.
No, you’re helping me make my point.

My sig describes an awesome, salty, friendly bitch, who has great tits.

It doesn’t describe a sentient set of great tits,

That’s what you saw, but that’s not what it says.

It’s very efficient that way.
 
Whatever, I guess.

To me, it reads that women would not prefer to be seen as a set of tits. Yet, you openly self describe yourself with that fact for whatever reason. What I saw and what you said, is all subjective.

It's all good.
 
Big, small, or great works.

Defining your self over your tits, then having an issue with others doing so, is humorous.
 
Being an awesome person that has awesome tits is not defining myself over tits.

If you listened to understand women’s perspectives rather than to speak over them, you might be more successful here.

I’m not sure if you’re being intentionally obtuse or not. But I’m done with this conversation. Best of luck in your endeavors.
 
Back
Top