Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rexfelis said:What do you believe the legal age of sexual consent SHOULD be? And, what is it where you live?
Weird Harold said:
You left off "None of the above."
I personally think that a "legal age of consent" is a stupid concept that ignores the fact that people mature physically and mentally at different rates. It's also an unwarranted intrusion of government into people's private lives.
Children and others can be "protected" from themselves and others without drawing an artificial line that bears no resemblance to real world maturity.
The age of consent protects the adult too; by letting those foolish enough to want to have sex with teenagers that there are consequences to their actions.Weird Harold said:I personally think that a "legal age of consent" is a stupid concept that ignores the fact that people mature physically and mentally at different rates. It's also an unwarranted intrusion of government into people's private lives.
Children and others can be "protected" from themselves and others without drawing an artificial line that bears no resemblance to real world maturity.
Shy Tall Guy said:The age of consent protects the adult too; by letting those foolish enough to want to have sex with teenagers that there are consequences to their actions.
I believe the federal age of consent is 18 - but you have to cross state lines for that to go into effect.
Shy Tall Guy said:The age of consent protects the adult too; by letting those foolish enough to want to have sex with teenagers that there are consequences to their actions.
I voted for 16 because that is what the law says in most states and because I know that a lot of teenagers are going to be sexually active by then, and I would hate to see some 17-21 year old go to jail for being immature and having sex with someone a year or two younger than them.
Personally I would not have sex with someone under 20 because I think they need at least 2 years out on their own to become an adult. Along those same lines, I do not think that teenagers should have sex before they are 20-21, and the more mature they are when they start having sex, the better.
I believe the federal age of consent is 18 - but you have to cross state lines for that to go into effect.
Texan said:In Texas, the legal age of consent is 18, but the "adult" must be at least three years older than the "minor" for there to be a violation.
The legal age of consent will never prevent kids from fooling around, it is just intended to prevent kids from being taken advantage of by someone older. That being the case, I think the age should be a bit younger at around 16.
Weird Harold said:
According to the UCMJ, the age of consent is 16 or the local age if higher. I believe that's based on the federal standard.
That would work about as well as any other attempt to get teenagers to refrain from having sex - it would fail miserably.Perhaps a "license to consent to sex" would be a better idea. You could make everyone eligible to test for their license at puberty, and make it illegal for anyone to have sex with anyone who hasn't passed the test.
Texan said:In Texas, the legal age of consent is 18, but the "adult" must be at least three years older than the "minor" for there to be a violation.
The legal age of consent will never prevent kids from fooling around, it is just intended to prevent kids from being taken advantage of by someone older. That being the case, I think the age should be a bit younger at around 16.
sexy-girl said:... also wouldnt be an excuse for a 40 yr old having sex with a 15/14 yr old and saying "i thought she was 16"
also for gays the ages of consent should be the same