What Portland Is Really All About

[Rightguide]

Despite the mewling of Democrats this is the real intent of the well planned and executed violence occurring in Portland and elsewhere:


‘Abolish The United States Of America’: Radical ‘Youth Liberation Front’ Active In Portland Encourages Violence, Explicitly Rejects Peaceful Protesting

Peter Hasson and Spencer Landis
Contributor

* A group calling themselves the Youth Liberation Front is credited in media reports with organizing anti-police rallies in Portland that have often turned violent.

*The group openly cheers violence and explicitly rejects peaceful protesting on social media.

*YLF says it wants to “destroy the United States of America.”


A radical group credited with organizing anti-police rallies in Portland openly cheers violence and explicitly rejects efforts to keep protests peaceful, a Daily Caller News Foundation review found.

The Youth Liberation Front is credited with organizing protests in Portland last week that extended into the early morning hours and turned violent, The Seattle Times and the Associated Press have reported. Portland police declared riots on multiple nights throughout the week.

The radical group’s goals extend far beyond changing policies and even beyond abolishing the police, as noted in a July 8 tweet: “we don’t want to be led, and we don’t want to lead, we just want to destroy the United States of America.”

“Abolish the United States of America,” the group wrote on Twitter in October. YLF has more than 32,000 followers on the social media platform.

More here:

https://dailycaller.com/2020/08/12/youth-liberation-front-portland-seattle/

 

[HisArpy]

I wonder if any of those idjits realize that the FBI investigates insurgents who promote the overthrow of the US government?



Maybe they all have VPN's so they're safe from being discovered...

 

[Wrong Element]

The president is openly admitting to rigging the election, but sure, let's talk about the totally brand-new phenomenon of dumb kids running their mouths.

 

[Emerson40]

People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share a Cluster of Psychological Features
Baseless theories threaten our safety and democracy. It turns out that specific emotions make people prone to such thinking


The mindset is surprisingly common, although thankfully it does not often lead to gunfire. More than a quarter of the American population believes there are conspiracies “behind many things in the world,” according to a 2017 analysis of government survey data by University of Oxford and University of Liverpool researchers. The prevalence of conspiracy mongering may not be new, but today the theories are becoming more visible, says Viren Swami, a social psychologist at Anglia Ruskin University in England, who studies the phenomenon. For instance, when more than a dozen bombs were sent to prominent Democrats and Trump critics, as well as CNN, in October 2018, a number of high-profile conservatives quickly suggested that the explosives were really a “false flag,” a fake attack orchestrated by Democrats to mobilize their supporters during the U.S. midterm elections.

One obvious reason for the current raised profile of this kind of thinking is that the U.S. president is a vocal conspiracy theorist. Donald Trump has suggested, among other things, that the father of Senator Ted Cruz of Texas helped to assassinate President John F. Kennedy and that Democrats funded the same migrant caravan traveling from Honduras to the U.S. that worried the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter.

But there are other factors at play, too. New research suggests that events happening worldwide are nurturing underlying emotions that make people more willing to believe in conspiracies. Experiments have revealed that feelings of anxiety make people think more conspiratorially. Such feelings, along with a sense of disenfranchisement, currently grip many Americans, according to surveys. In such situations, a conspiracy theory can provide comfort by identifying a convenient scapegoat and thereby making the world seem more straightforward and controllable. “People can assume that if these bad guys weren’t there, then everything would be fine,” Lewandowsky says. “Whereas if you don’t believe in a conspiracy theory, then you just have to say terrible things happen randomly.”

Discerning fact from fiction can be difficult, however, and some seemingly wild conspiracy ideas turn out to be true. The once scoffed at notion that Russian nationals meddled in the 2016 presidential election is now supported by a slew of guilty pleas, evidence-based indictments and U.S. intelligence agency conclusions. So how is one to know what to believe? There, too, psychologists have been at work and have uncovered strategies that can help people distinguish plausible theories from those that are almost certainly fake—strategies that seem to become more important by the day.

SOURCE

 

[HisArpy]

The president is openly admitting to rigging the election, but sure, let's talk about the totally brand-new phenomenon of dumb kids running their mouths.

Cite?


Or more of your TDS bullshit?

 

[DeluxAuto]

So for over two months, we've heard nothing about these snot-nosed little shits but all of the sudden they are the masterminds behind the whole thing? Get the fuck outta here with that weak shit.

 

[Rightguide]

The president is openly admitting to rigging the election, but sure, let's talk about the totally brand-new phenomenon of dumb kids running their mouths.

You mean he's asking the that the law be enforced and you consider that rigging the election, right? The only one running their mouth seems to be you.