What is an orgasm worth?

What would you pay for an orgasm implant?

  • Anything. Where's my credit card?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not that much. Do they do easy terms?

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • I don't need it. I get enough orgasms.

    Votes: 8 80.0%
  • What's an orgasm?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10

oggbashan

Dying Truth seeker
Joined
Jul 3, 2002
Posts
56,017
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday November 26, 07:07 PM

Women needed to test orgasm machine

LONDON (Reuters) - Wanted: women to test new orgasm machine.


No, really. An American surgeon who has patented a device that triggers an orgasm has begun a clinical trial approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States and is looking for female volunteers.


"I thought people would be beating my door down to become part of the trial," pain specialist Dr Stuart Meloy told New Scientist magazine on Wednesday.


But so far only one woman has completed the first stage of the trial, with apparently breathtaking results, and a second has agreed to take part.


Meloy, of Piedmont Anesthesia and Pain Consultants in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, is hoping to find eight more volunteers willing to have electrodes inserted in their spine and be connected to a pacemaker-size machine implanted under the skin to heighten their sexual pleasure.


The married woman who tested the machine, dubbed an orgasmatron, had not had an orgasm for four years. But during the nine days she used it, she had several.


"She even told me she had the first multiple orgasm of her life using the device," said Meloy.


He stumbled on the unexpected side-effect while using a spinal cord stimulator a few years ago to treat a patient suffering with severe back pain. The woman had already had back surgery for degenerative disk disease and fusion surgery.


When Meloy placed the electrodes into a specific spot on her spine to find nerve bundles carrying pain signals to the brain, she moaned with delight.


"You're going to have to teach my husband how to do that," he quoted her as saying.


The tiny impulses of electricity applied to the electrodes seemed to have turned on the patient's orgasm button.


Although the device has been compared to the orgasmatron featured in the 1973 Woody Allen film "Sleeper", Meloy envisions patients using it temporarily to retrain their sexual response.


The women in the trial described it as "really excellent foreplay."


Although some medical experts are sceptical about the procedure and say a vibrator can produce the same results, Meloy believes it could help to improve sexual response in women who cannot have orgasms and might even help men as well.


A full implant of the device would cost about 13,000 pounds.


"I don't see it any differently from procedures such as breast implants," Meloy told the magazine.

---------------------

Would you pay 20,000 dollars for this?

Og
 
Patient ‘A' paid $20,00.00 to get the Orgasmatron and have it installed. For a week it seemed to work as advertised, then it appeared to develop a serious malfunction.

Instead of inducing sensations which eventually produce massive spasming of the woman's internal muscles about her vulva, clitoris, and vagina, the sensations migrated to the musculature of one of her legs.

Every time it was turned on, the heavy muscles in the calf and thigh of her left leg appeared to react, spasming greatly, which could be seen to lift the affected leg high in a backward bending arc.

For several weeks the doctors were completely baffled, and unable to suggest any reason for the stimulated nerves to have transferred their messages to a different target.

Except for this obvious malfunction, the device should have worked, as advertised.

Finally, one researcher got a strange, almost insane idea. He asked Patient ‘A' if she knew what was happening. Why was her leg jerking, and her foot swinging back in a tight circle, instead of her having an orgasm?

"Oh, I'm still having an orgasm," the patient replied, "but, every time I feel another one go off, I remember that I paid twenty thousand dollars for something which half the guys down at the pub would have been happy to give me for free, maybe even pay me to do it!

"When I remember that, I want to kick myself in the ass. . . ."
 
Nyet. If all else fails I warm up my favorite digit.

Perdita :)
 
Seems that the AH crowd isn't much for the orgasmatron.

And why would we? We can read the excellent stories in here for free!:)
 
Just the name on that thing sends shivers down my spine.

What?

No, the bad kind of shivers.
 
Can you be more specific? How much is which orgasm worth?

The first? That one's always special.

The second! One of my favorites, because it makes him so happy.

The third? Hmm. At that point, it begins to be painful. Have mercy, baby. I have to rest for a mi ---

nooo! no no no no nooo, ah god ah GOD!! please I can't - I can't - can't STAND it anymore --

Okay, the third one is good too. But no fourth one, dammit! Not without a break.

:devil:
 
Svenskaflicka said:
Oh, please! Anything less than 6 orgasms in a row is a waste of my time!:rolleyes:
You made me think about this, Flicka.

I like mine as in a fine drawn out dining experience. Lovely appetizers, a first and second, third, etc. course, the main course (long time coming) and then a sweet and light dessert (or two).

Sometimes I settle for fast food though.

Perdita :p
 
*sighs* Hubby's into slow, sensual love-making. To him, "having a quickie" takes 2 hours...

The man is spoiling me rotten.
 
All woman have multiple orgasms because all men have ten-inch penises. It's the universal truth of cybersex.

:D
 
Though right now, I'm starving. I haven't seen Hubby since the end of June, and yesterday, he told me that instead of coming over in December to stay for a weekend, he's postponing the visit until January, when he'll be able to stay for a few days instead.

I can see the scene in front of me: Chippendales on stage, looking embarrassed, as a mad Swedish woman with rolling eyes clings to their legs and cries out: "Please! I haven't seen a naked man since June! Have mercy on a horny woman - show me your cock!!!":rolleyes:
 
shereads said:
All woman have multiple orgasms because all men have ten-inch penises. It's the universal truth of cybersex.
She, not if one uses webcams. :p

Perdita
 
perdita said:
She, not if one uses webcams. :p

Perdita

Oh, but Perdita. Such realistic stand-ins are available for those tight close-ups.

Stand-ups, I meant to say.

;)
 
shereads said:
Oh, but Perdita. Such realistic stand-ins are available for those tight close-ups. Stand-ups, I meant to say.
I'm not stupid, She. I demand a full frontal shot, and give same. :devil:
 
Web-cams, chats, video-phones...

We can now talk to people in realtime, and see them at the same time. With the virtual reality developing even further, we'll soon be able to talk to each other in realtime, see each other, and even reach out and touch each other.

Those of us who are too poor to buy the modern technology, however, will have to resort to the old-fashioned way of seeing, touching and hearing the person we're talking to - to move our lazy butts out of the sofa and actually MEET!:rolleyes:
 
Orgasmatron

This doesn't seem like such a good thing if all she does is push a button, have her nerves goosed and she cums, with no penetration. On the other hand, if the guy cums and she hasn't yet, so she pushes the button and gets off, that would probably be worthwhile. I have seen devices advertised online and described on television that you might call fixed vibrators. A woman lies down on a bed and there is a pole with a vibrator attached, and she stradddles the pole, inserts the vibrator and turns it on. I suppose there would be different sized dildos that attach and the user controls the speed and the depth of penetration. I would supose also that the vibrator could be raised or lowered so the woman could use different positions, including anal. This would certainly be more versatile than a hand-held vibrator but would also be more expensive and take up more space.

I also read another thread about having a woman use a strapon in a man. A lot of men, including I, said they would like the idea. This would give similar results but I don't think it would be the same as having a woman doing it.
 
Re: Orgasmatron

Boxlicker101 said:
I also read another thread about having a woman use a strapon in a man. A lot of men, including I, said they would like the idea. This would give similar results but I don't think it would be the same as having a woman doing it.

Having a woman with a strap-on wouldn't be the same thing as having a woman doing it... with what?:confused:
 
Box, you give new meaning to the standard four-poster bed.

Perdita :p
 
Having a woman with a strap-on wouldn't be the same thing as having a woman doing it.

In the first paragraph I described what I referred to as a "fixed vibrator", and in the second paragraph I mentioned the thread about a woman using a strapon on a man and I compared that to using the fixed vibrator. You are right. for the sake of clarity, since it was a second paragraph, I should have said something like "This would give similar results to the fixed vibrator but I don't think that would be the same as having a woman using a srapon.
 
Back
Top