What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[JohnnySavage]

you could have easily said

he made $ and it cost him $70....which was closer to the truth than your number

yet you decided to NIGGERIZE yourself

ASS FUCKING HOLE

You don't know that. A smart business shows 0 profit and pays no income tax. He's talking about the costs of license(s) it seems. He should quit putting his hooker money on the company credit card and he'd have enough money to compete.

Are you saying the playing field isn't level?

 

[busybody..]

^^^IGGY

Your loss for now

 

[IrezumiKiss]

*watches with amusement the exchange between a rational human being and a sociopathic racist shitstain*

*Johnny being the rational human being*

 

[JohnnySavage]

http://www.ashleybertsch.com/

Nice Jesus fish at the bottom. Render unto Caesar that what is Caesar's


http://www2.bookerauction.com/?p=668

I coulda used one of those trucks.




Also... it seems Bob Bertsch is a commissioner for the local utility district.

 

[busybody..]

Consider what we have

A "person" who knows better

SHITTER SAVAGE

makes up numbers to make a small businessman appear to be greedy or ineffective.....says he should RAISE PRICES, as if that is easy to do in any environment for a small company......says he makes $100 and pays only $10 in taxes, when in fact he knows actual taxes are 4-5-6 times as much, not included insurance, regulations etc etc, which leaves most companies PENNIES on the dollar......he know MOST jobs are created by small business....he know that companies are sitting on BILLIONS and doing nothing cause of regime uncertainity.....


While at the same time, he and other NIGGERS, like occupiers and NIGGER IN CHIEF shit all over BIG BUSINESS as well


Why cant he just admit that we have a problem and it starts at the top?


HE NIGGERIZED HIMSELF


Meanwhile, DUMMY NIGGER, (but I repeat myself, IREEM CUZINS, saw the number and ran with it....as if he was a NIGGER enough, making himself a bigger NIGGER

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Consider what we have

a racist shitstain

being, well,

A RACIST SHITSTAIN

'nuff said.

 

[busybody..]

Consider what we have

a racist shitstain

being, well,

A RACIST SHITSTAIN

'nuff said.

Consider what we have

A NON PRODUCER

SHITTING ON PRODUCERS

A TYPICAL NIGGER

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Consider what we have

a racist shitstain

being, well,

A RACIST SHITSTAIN

'nuff said.

truth

 

[busybody..]

Good NEWS NIGGER

As you are useless, I am putting you on IGGY

Ahh, if it were THAT wasy to IGGY ALL NIGGERS

BYE

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Consider what we have

a racist shitstain

being, well,

A RACIST SHITSTAIN

'nuff said.

preach, preach!

 

[busybody..]

No doubt, newly MINTER NIGGER, Savage will not understand this

Obama 'behind enemy lines'
Ed Lasky




A nagging fear that many have had about President Obama is moving closer to the mainstream, as evidence accumulates.

George Will plucks a key sentence from Barack Obama's "Dreams From My Father" that encapsulates Obama's philosophy and guiding principle behind his policies


Barack Obama had written that during his brief sojourn in the private sector he felt like " a spy behind enemy lines."

Apparently it took only a brief exposure to the real world of free enterprise to make him feel business was the enemy. He considered himself a "spy" against this enemy. A spy wants to do harm against the "enemy."

Ipso facto: vast new regulations, job-killing ObamaCare, class warfare rhetoric, end runs around Congress to bolster the power of unions, environmental rules that will cripple many businesses with high electricity costs (recall his boast that his Presidency would necessarily lead to high "electricity prices" and that those who build coal mines and coal-fired power plants would face bankruptcy), huge new tax increases, and a myriad of other measures and executive actions that have derailed job growth in America. The class warfare rhetoric has just made this agenda even clearer.

Stephanie Gutmann of the Telegraph found that line of interest in her column from March 1st, 2009 and wrote about business journalist's Larry Kudlow reaction to that line in "Does Barack Obama hate free enterprise":


Kudlow, once a budget guy in the Reagan administration, had a huge head of steam up about what he calls President Obama's "declaration of war on investors, entrepreneurs, small businesses, large corporations, and private-equity and venture-capital funds."

Gutmann wrote -- almost three years ago, mind you -- that she did not know yet whether that passage in Obama's book was highly significant or not but that she'd throw it into her "Does the President hate free enterprise?" file.

That file must be bulging now; three years out we know the answer.

Barack Obama hates free enterprise. He and the First Lady have derided those who work for businesses as compared to those who work for the government -- without recognizing that those who work in the "real world" pay the salaries of those who work for government bureaucracies.

Businesses have heard the message loud and clear and have responded as anyone would: with fear. When businesses lose confidence in leadership -- worse, when they fear leadership -- they do not expand, they do not hire. Instead they try to husband their resources and save it for better times. Hence, the stagnant job and wage growth. Do not be fooled by the headline yesterday about the unemployment rate falling. That number reflects huge numbers of people leaving the labor force because they are discouraged about the prospects of finding a job. They should be, given the man in the Oval Office and his minions doing his bidding.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/12/obama_behind_enemy_lines.html#ixzz1fbPAdhQq

 

[busybody..]

Of course

To QUOTE NIGGERS actual words is RACIST

Just as its RACIST to use his ACTUAL GIVE NAME!

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Consider what we have

a racist shitstain

being, well,

A RACIST SHITSTAIN

'nuff said.

like a prophecy unfolding

 

[busybody..]

I see that the millon air whites from NY

Slaughtered the helpless

Native Americans

Shitter Savage seen gloating

 

[JohnnySavage]

Come on over, I have a pot of collard greens simmering in bacon drippings.

 

[cjh]

corn bread?

 

[JohnnySavage]

corn bread?

No, I didn't feel like going all out. Sautee'd bacon, onions and garlic then added the greens. That's enough for me.

 

[cjh]

that sounds like a great way to prepare greens.

but no cornbread - :/

http://www.rgardennb.com/images/HomepgPicts/Pepper_vinegar.jpg

 

[JohnnySavage]

A splash of vinegar at the end is the secret.

 

[cjh]

fuckin' A.

 

[busybody..]

New NIGGERSAVAGE will scream, Let him go bankruot, OLD NIGGER Cuzzins will just BLEAT

Wednesday, November 23, 2011, 7:00am EST

A Waco, Ga., businessman has stirred up a load of controversy due to signs he posted on his company's trucks that say: "New Company Policy: We are not hiring until Obama is gone," reports Atlanta Business Chronicle broadcast partner WXIA-TV.

When asked by a WXIA reporter what is behind the sentiment, Bill Looman, the owner of U.S. Cranes, LLC, said simply, "Can't afford it."

Looman added, "I've got people that I want to hire now, but I just can't afford it. And I don't foresee that I'll be able to afford it unless some things change in D.C."

He said he put the signs on the trucks and posted pictures of them on his personal Facebook page six months ago, but things took a turn when, on Monday, the photos went viral on the Internet.

Since then he’s been applauded and blasted by throngs on the Internet, had to disconnect his phone, and even gotten a visit from the Secret Service.

Looman said someone, and he thinks he knows who it was, reported him to the FBI as a threat to national security. He told WXIA the accusation made its way through the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and finally the Secret Service. Agents interviewed him. "The Secret Service left here, they were in a good mood and laughing," said Looman, who added he just spent 10 years in the Marine Corps. “I got the feeling they thought it was kind of ridiculous, and a waste of their time."

He said even though things have gotten hot, he doesn’t plan to take the signs down.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You don't know that. A smart business shows 0 profit and pays no income tax. He's talking about the costs of license(s) it seems. He should quit putting his hooker money on the company credit card and he'd have enough money to compete.

Are you saying the playing field isn't level?

That would have to be a very small operation that had no use for bank loans, investors or the issuance of stock...





Did you gradually walk out on this ledge to prove some arcane point?

To busybody????????????

:groan: Oy vey...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

For the past 12 months, payroll taxes for working Americans have been reduced by 2 percentage points, putting about $1,000 extra in the pocket of typical household. If Congress does not act by year's end, the full payroll tax of 6.2 percent will be restored to everyone's paychecks, increasing taxes on 160 million Americans.

Extending the cut won't do much to help the economy in terms of creating jobs (there's no saving for employers) or spurring spending (in this economy, people are more likely to use marginal increases in take-home pay to pay down debt than to go shopping).

As importantly, extending the cut on a temporary basis is precisely the sort of half-baked intervention that accomplishes little more than injecting even more uncertainty into an already murky economic situation. Reducing tax rates can help spur investment and job creation, but "temporary" tax cuts never have that effect precisely because producers and consumers know a change is coming soon.

Making the payroll tax cut permanent is a different story, but only if Social Security benefits are cut by the same amount as the reduction in taxes. Remember, in theory, taxes are credited to the Social Security Trust Fund, where they establish the program's authority to pay out benefits to retirees.

Unfortunately, Congress will likely be politically expedient and cut taxes without cutting benefits. To pull this off, policymakers will borrow money and transfer it to the Social Security Trust Fund to make it look as if this tax revenue was collected. Make no mistake: That's just another unfunded promise to seniors that will be paid for by future's generations.

But Republicans will go along with it because an election is coming and commercials will be made with union dues...

This isn't new practice, of course. This budget gimmick was already used to "pay" for the $120 billion revenue shortfall from the December tax deal. Also, for years, we have been recording tax revenues from the beneficiaries of the earned income tax credit (EITC) even though their share of the payroll tax is refunded to them. Also, the Making Work Pay tax credit that was part of the stimulus bill also refunded payroll taxes a second time over to many of these same workers.

Veronique de Rugy is a professor and a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. She was previously a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, and a research fellow at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation.

 

[JohnnySavage]

That would have to be a very small operation that had no use for bank loans, investors or the issuance of stock...





Did you gradually walk out on this ledge to prove some arcane point?

To busybody????????????

:groan: Oy vey...

Busy sometimes picks out a molehill and tries to make it a mountain. Here, a mom and pop contractor wanted to retire. At the auction he said he was tired of all the regulations. BB conflates that into an indictment of the entire US economy. There's no indication that he was retiring because of the regulations, or if he were 40 instead of 65 that he would be quitting.

Other contractors are doing just fine in that city.

Nobody else talks to him so I figured I'd stretch his point a bit.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The coming year-end spending spree after so much debate over budget deficits shows just how hard it is to stem the government's flow of red ink.

Lawmakers are poised to spend $120 billion or so to renew a Social Security tax cut that averaged just under $1,000 per household this year. They're ready to commit up to $50 billion more to continue unemployment benefits to people out of work for more than half a year.

And doctors have no reason to doubt they won't be rescued, again, from steep cuts in their Medicare payments. Combine that with the tax cuts and jobless benefits, and Congress could add almost $200 billion to the federal ledger this month.

That's why it's excruciatingly difficult to cut the deficit, even when the House is influenced by Tea Party forces.

...

The chairmen and senior minority members of the Senate and House agriculture committees tried to add a five-year farm bill onto a deficit panel package that never came together. They promised "reforms" that would end much-criticized direct subsidy payments to Southern rice and cotton growers whether they farm or not.
But instead of banking the nearly $50 billion in savings, farm-state lawmakers maneuvered to channel much of the money to a new subsidy for locking in four-decade-high revenues for corn and soybean growers in the Midwest.

The new subsidy would act as a free revenue insurance and could pay out if a farm lost as little as 13 percent of its revenue in a year. They easily could end up costing the government as much or more than the current subsidies to cotton and rice growers

The revenue insurance idea, said Bruce Babcock, an agricultural economist at Iowa State University, is a "cynical attempt to turn deficit reduction into a guarantee of prosperity for large-scale agricultural interests."

Republicans insist that extending the Social Security tax cut and jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed must be paid for through cuts to other programs or finding other non-tax sources of money for them.

But using any such arrangements means they're no longer available for cutting deficits.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...s-up-year-end-spending-spree/?test=latestnews

Our government sees no impending fiscal crises.

Nor does Greece.

Hey, after all, we're ALL too big to fail, so just keep humming lullabies and coo softly to your voting block to keep the contributions rolling in...