What drives you to delete a comment on your own story?

designatedvictim

Red Shirt
Joined
Sep 16, 2024
Posts
136
TL,DR: why do you delete a comment on one of your stories? What is it about a comment that says 'This needs deleting'?

In the years that I've visited here, I’d never voted or commented until very recently.

My first low-vote-and-comment-explaining-it was to a relatively recent story that just bugged me. The more I thought of the story, the more I hated it. Hated the characters. I'd initially just left nothing, but seeing it again in the story list a few days later, after my festering hatred for the story grew, pushed me to vote/comment.

Another, more recent, story - this story was pretty basic trope, nothing bad, in and of itself, just no great shakes - was only three pages long, but I couldn't get past the typos.

Shock! If a story is poorly-enough written, it erodes my liking (thus, potential vote) for the story.

As I've freely admitted since I created this account, I get wordy (see: this post), and my comments follow that philosophy - these weren't two-word, drive-by comments.

There were several times the writer used the wrong words in places (still noted in other remaining comments), but his personal bete noire seemed to be your/you’re.

Typos happen. I get it. We all do it. Done it plenty of times myself. In some cases, it can get so bad that I can't not remark upon it.

I posted a rather negative comment (but left no vote, this time) on it. A few days later, I checked the comments on the story (after the sometimes-snarky follow-up comments regarding my first-ever comment, elsewhere, I like to see if anyone refers to it – it’s entirely possible that I may be a masochist) and my comment was gone.

On the first page of this particular story, your/you’re was used, IIRC, eighteen times. Twelve of which (I suppose it might only have been eleven) were the wrong choice. For me, shit like that is like stepping on a Lego in the middle of the night. It doesn’t matter that I might be heading for the bathroom, I stop to bitch and moan loudly about it right there.

I still have the account activity notification that I’d commented on the story, so I didn’t figure that I’d imagined that I’d done so.

I haven’t felt any burning need to delete any of the (fairly few) comments left on my own stuff. Even the guy telling me I needed to learn how to craft a basic sentence.

Why do you guys delete comments (if you have)? Some can be unhinged rants and ought to go, but what crosses that line for you?

Ironically, that first comment I made, where I trashed the characters, is still up. The author never commented upon it, other than a tepid, passive dismissal in one of his own later comments, but it's still there.

P.S.
I wish that I'd saved a copy of the comment. While it wasn't any Literary Award Winner, I really did enjoy writing something along the lines of 'One time is an accident, twice is a coincidence, twelve times is enemy action.'
 
The only two kinds of comments I delete are ad-hominems (which don't happen often) and comments from wannabe writers trying to piggyback off my story by submitting a 749-word "comment" that, in effect, constitutes an addition or revision to my story. Which they and everyone else in the comments section has just read.

That used to happen more often, too. An unhinged rant doesn't particularly bother me.
 
The only comments I have deleted are ones that were essentially hate-speech or, as with Voboy, ad hominems. Otherwise, I'm not bothered by something negative - if I allow comments, I should allow genuine criticism.
 
I don't delete ANY comments.

People are entitled to their opinions. So, I allow all of them to remain. The admins will sometimes delete personal attack comments like the one time I found "EAT SHIT AND DIE!" on one of my stories. A day later that comment was gone.

And after the first year or so of posting stories here, I resist the urge to comment on my own stories to respond to anyone. I feel it's not a two-way conversation, and the original poster of a comment is unlikely to check back for a response. If they want a dialog with me, they'd "Contact the Author" with an e-mail.
 
If I start a story and it's unreadable to me for any reason or I just don't like it, I just back out. I don't attack the author for it.


When I see (saw) comments on family relations stories saying 'they should have a baby', I wipe those. You want to tear me apart for anything else, fine as long as you don't get abusive. You want an author to permanently alter character's lives, you're gone.
 
I don't delete any comments and here's my thought process with that.

One, we complain about lack of comments, so getting and deleting them leads to "Oh, so you don't want comments" To me, if you want them, you can't cherry pick them and a lot of authors do that

Another point is that my personal philosophy is that if someone leaves some nasty remark and I remove it? They come back and see its gone, that gives them a win "I got under their skin" I won't give them that.

I also believe in free speech even if its speech I don't agree with, or personal attacks levied against me, you have the right to spew, have at it while I smirk at the thought of how much room my story took up in your triggered mind.

I also enjoy when other readers show up and call out the troll.

Last, I want their ignorance on full display. Let other people read it, shake their head and say, what an asshole.

Having said all this, this works for me and others. There is no right or wrong here, just what's right wrong for each person.

My opinion is leave them up, but I can only speak for me
 
And after the first year or so of posting stories here, I resist the urge to comment on my own stories to respond to anyone. I feel it's not a two-way conversation, and the original poster of a comment is unlikely to check back for a response.

I seldom reply, but my thought process there is that I'm not replying to the original poster. If they had something to say, or if my story led to a question in their mind, then others might have similar thoughts or questions. So I'm replying to those thoughts from subsequent posters.

Just once has an original commenter come back and responded. That was weird, but I left the exchange up for others to read. That dude was crazy. I had replied because he was looking for things in my story that I had never dreamed of putting there, and seemed to be laboring under the belief that those things were "required."
 
I seldom reply, but my thought process there is that I'm not replying to the original poster. If they had something to say, or if my story led to a question in their mind, then others might have similar thoughts or questions. So I'm replying to those thoughts from subsequent posters.

Just once has an original commenter come back and responded. That was weird, but I left the exchange up for others to read. That dude was crazy. I had replied because he was looking for things in my story that I had never dreamed of putting there, and seemed to be laboring under the belief that those things were "required."
I know what you mean by replying for the sake of others. But eventually that would be like trying to revise my story.

It is what it is when I posted it. So, for every commenter who reads and doesn't get a particular point, I take that as a learning experience to try doing better in my next story.

And there are some "readers" who admit they don't really "read" the story as it was written. They skim your story but still feel the need to comment on their own imaginary version. So, there's no point arguing with those who live within their own mind. You can't change their fantasy world view.
 
I almost never delete comments. In almost 9 years I've done it once or maybe twice. I did it not because they were negative (though they were) but because they were idiotic and obscene.

I notice that I've had a few comments of mine that were deleted from time to time. Once I wrote a comment that was complimentary overall but got a bit grammar Nazi-ish on one particular point, and the author scrubbed it. Afterward, I thought he was probably right to do that because I went overboard. I've dialed back that tendency in my comments ever since.
 
I’ve deleted a small handful that were abusive to me, my mother, or other readers, but that’s it. There is no right to free speech, but open communication is good.
 
And after the first year or so of posting stories here, I resist the urge to comment on my own stories to respond to anyone.
This is worth a discussion in itself. I think at the start a lot of authors try to reply to comments, but many learn quickly that it doesn't matter. Most of the time the reader doesn't come back to see it, or it can lead to someone else commenting in disagreement. All manner of stupid can happen. Maybe if people began getting notifications "Author X responded to your comment" it could be worth it, but like you said, there is e-mail feedback if people really want to hear back.

I also find it tacky and needy. Needy as in an author running to reply, so excited someone commented they need to call it out, and tacky as in its stat padding. By that I mean you see a story has 30 comments and you're like, hmm, it has some buzz let me check it out. Then you see half the comments are the author responding to every single comment.
 
I've only deleted one comment because it ended with a political statement that had nothing to do with the story. However, the comment itself was valid so I copied the comment before deleting it and re-posted it without the ending political statement.
 
I don't delete comments unless they become redundant e.g. if a reader points out an error to me, I then correct it and submit an edit. Otherwise I leave them all.

Incidentally, when did you submit your comment? There is definitely a delay in comment approval at the moment. Somebody told me via DM that they commented on my story "Forty" 5 days ago, but it still hasn't appeared. They have since submitted a second comment which also hasn't appeared. So, are you certain it got deleted and hasn't been stuck in moderation hell?
 
I seldom reply, but my thought process there is that I'm not replying to the original poster. If they had something to say, or if my story led to a question in their mind, then others might have similar thoughts or questions. So I'm replying to those thoughts from subsequent posters.

Just once has an original commenter come back and responded. That was weird, but I left the exchange up for others to read. That dude was crazy. I had replied because he was looking for things in my story that I had never dreamed of putting there, and seemed to be laboring under the belief that those things were "required."
I see your point, especially if they're projecting something negative into the story that wasn't there.

But I believe in letting readers interpret however they will. They want to try to read between the lines, they can, even if I have no idea what they think they're reading.

On occasions a comment like that might make me sit back and wonder "Did I write in a way that hints at "X"? Did I unintentionally plant a seed there?" Its useful to give another insight into your own work-when its rational and not trolling-but still not worth replying to. I'm fine with people thinking what they want. I put it out there, meaning its fair game in every way
 
I've deleted two comments. One was gushing praise for a story. The other was the same person commenting again and saying the praise was meant for a different story.

I could've just deleted the one admitting to the mistake and kept the praise, but it wasn't my praise to have, so I deleted it, too.
 
I've deleted two comments. One was gushing praise for a story. The other was the same person commenting again and saying the praise was meant for a different story.

I could've just deleted the one admitting to the mistake and kept the praise, but it wasn't my praise to have, so I deleted it, too.
This is one of those situations where I wish we could dose the AH with truth serum then ask if they'd have done the same. The truth serum would be needed.
 
This is one of those situations where I wish we could dose the AH with truth serum then ask if they'd have done the same. The truth serum would be needed.
The odds of that happening often seems low, but I do love the idea of a rogue commenter mis clicking all the stories they intended to comment on, then correcting themselves on the same wrong story.

(When it happened, I laughed because every time I get praise on a story I fucking question if it was meant for someone else's story and the commenter accidentally clicked mine, and then someone actually did it!)
 
I like to think I would've kept both comments because this is just hilarious.
I considered it, but felt bad for the commenter having that mistake out there. I just genuinely hope they repeated the comment on the right story. (They never said the story or I would've checked and copied the comment over to the correct author if they didn't do it themselves.)
 
I like to think I would've kept both comments because this is just hilarious.
It would be interesting to see how many people catch it, probably not as many as you'd think.

The most tempted I've been to remove a comment is when someone was going around commenting on I/T stories saying "You should dead so and so's stories" it was anon and I'm convinced was the author themselves. Our stories are not billboards for other stories. The comment ended up going away and my guess is someone may have reported it.
 
I see your point, especially if they're projecting something negative into the story that wasn't there.

But I believe in letting readers interpret however they will. They want to try to read between the lines, they can, even if I have no idea what they think they're reading.

On occasions a comment like that might make me sit back and wonder "Did I write in a way that hints at "X"? Did I unintentionally plant a seed there?" Its useful to give another insight into your own work-when its rational and not trolling-but still not worth replying to. I'm fine with people thinking what they want. I put it out there, meaning its fair game in every way

I think I have deleted perhaps a total of six or eight comments, all of the "show us your tits" type.

As to responding, I am somewhere between you and Voboy. I don't reply to criticism, but I will answer focused questions, such as "Will there be a followup chapter" or things of that type, particularly if I recognize them as from repeat readers.

I couple of times I've responded to comments that claimed I have made a factual error when I have not. You can shit on my writing, but I do my research.
 
I think I have deleted perhaps a total of six or eight comments, all of the "show us your tits" type.

As to responding, I am somewhere between you and Voboy. I don't reply to criticism, but I will answer focused questions, such as "Will there be a followup chapter" or things of that type, particularly if I recognize them as from repeat readers.

I couple of times I've responded to comments that claimed I have made a factual error when I have not. You can shit on my writing, but I do my research.
Only 6 or 8 show me your tits comments? I'm disappointed in the readers. But you do write mostly romance.

Post once in the fetish forum/playground and you'll get that in an hour.

I have a big glasses fetish, so you do just fine by me. :p

I responded to one 'factual error' comment because they had the audacity to question my knowledge of horror comics. I can deal with all manner of abuse, even death threats, but you do not question my geekdom.
 
Back
Top