LukkyKnight
Equal Opportunity Enjoyer
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2001
- Posts
- 58,516
I've come to regard it as an inner-ancestor, or inner-guru, lately, because calling this piece of my personality a child conveys the wrong feel.
See, I think it's people who are (desperately) committed to (or obsessive about) being, seeming, acting, or embodying "mature," the people who've rushed as fast as they can to become grown-ups, that spoiled the use of this inner-child term as they use it to convey "something I've grown beyond, something to be controlled and managed and kept in check..." Obviously there are times when it's probably best not to get too silly, but children do know that, too. Children are people.
IMHO it's not so healthy to wall off pieces of us, to confine that inner-older-us to some chamber which others never visit or see. That inner-previously-aware-me has got more experience than the alleged grown up component, it's seen more, it's LIVED more. Why not integrate that experience rather than propogate a schism and rely on the less-experienced facets of our personality (the ones wrongly called "mature")?
I have seen those who repress all the things they enjoyed when they were 11, or 21, and I don't envy them. Sometimes they have more money than I do, sometimes a lot more, but part of them is dying in solitary confinement. I don't want my epitath to read, "Here he is. His huge pile of money outlasted him. There's a fight in progress still about who gets it. He never smiled."
See, I think it's people who are (desperately) committed to (or obsessive about) being, seeming, acting, or embodying "mature," the people who've rushed as fast as they can to become grown-ups, that spoiled the use of this inner-child term as they use it to convey "something I've grown beyond, something to be controlled and managed and kept in check..." Obviously there are times when it's probably best not to get too silly, but children do know that, too. Children are people.
IMHO it's not so healthy to wall off pieces of us, to confine that inner-older-us to some chamber which others never visit or see. That inner-previously-aware-me has got more experience than the alleged grown up component, it's seen more, it's LIVED more. Why not integrate that experience rather than propogate a schism and rely on the less-experienced facets of our personality (the ones wrongly called "mature")?
I have seen those who repress all the things they enjoyed when they were 11, or 21, and I don't envy them. Sometimes they have more money than I do, sometimes a lot more, but part of them is dying in solitary confinement. I don't want my epitath to read, "Here he is. His huge pile of money outlasted him. There's a fight in progress still about who gets it. He never smiled."