Stella_Omega
No Gentleman
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Posts
- 39,700
The most complete investigation into the the abusive practices of "anti-sissification therapy" is here at Box Turtle Bulletin.
There's a lot of links, but it's all very well presented, and anyone who is interested in this story will be glad they read it.
The CNN article is rather odd. It talks a lot about George Rekers, probably since his downfall with the male prostitute is just too delicious to forget about. BTB points out:
Of COURSE many people are quick to jump on the parents, and of course the mother in particular. But:
And that's going to be my only personal opinion untill more people have read the report
There's a lot of links, but it's all very well presented, and anyone who is interested in this story will be glad they read it.
In 1970, a well-known expert on homosexuality and transgender issues appeared on a local television talk show in Los Angeles to talk about feminine boys. He described how very young boys who behaved in a feminine manner would almost invariably grow up to become a homosexual. Alongside that expert was a gay man who described his own childhood and confirmed what the expert said. But there was hope, the expert announced. A new program at the University of California at Los Angeles would ensure these young boys grew up to become masculine, normal men. The expert gave a list of symptoms to watch out for, and urged his viewers to call him if their children exhibited the problems he described.
The mother of a four year, eleven month old boy saw that program that afternoon. She noted the list of symptoms that the expert gave and concluded that there was something seriously wrong with her son. She and her husband decided to take their young boy to UCLA for treatment to prevent him from growing up to be gay.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/what-are-little-boys-made-of-main
The CNN article is rather odd. It talks a lot about George Rekers, probably since his downfall with the male prostitute is just too delicious to forget about. BTB points out:
All of the published literature surrounding Kirk’s case has it that George Rekers was solely responsible for Kirk’s treatment. But that’s not how Kirk’s family remembers it. To them, Rekers was nothing but a first year grad student. For forty years, they’ve held Dr. Richard Green responsible, the expert that Kirk’s mother saw on television. Getting to the bottom of who was really in charge of Kirk’s treatment is not as easy as one would expect. http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/cuius_culpa
Of COURSE many people are quick to jump on the parents, and of course the mother in particular. But:
One of the most horrifying episodes, to me, is that Kirk tried to commit suicide as a teen. Green shrugged it off;Kirk’s therapy took place at UCLA, home to some of the world’s top experts on gender identity and sexual orientation. As Kirk’s mother said, “I trusted these professionals to know what they were doing.”
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/what-are-little-boys-made-of2
Green didn't think it was necessary to talk about this with the parents... Who were in pretty bad shape themselves at that time, admittedly. But I really think that Green felt it was better that a boy become so self-homophobic that he'd rather suicide than it would be for him to simply be gay.KYLE: It wasn’t like I was real. And afterwards, a few weeks later, I tried to kill myself.
R. G.: Tell me about that.
KYLE: I swallowed about fifty aspirins.
R. G.: Did you really want to die?
KYLE: I think I really wanted to, but I knew I wasn’t going to. But I really did want to.
R. G.: Why?
KYLE: Because I don’t want to grow up to be gay.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/what-are-little-boys-made-of5
And that's going to be my only personal opinion untill more people have read the report
Last edited: