Welcome to the Fourth Reich

Clare Quilty

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 6, 2004
Posts
950
Bush Zones Go National
by Jim Hightower

At the 2000 GOP nominating convention in Philadelphia, candidate Bush created a fenced-in, out-of-sight protest zone that could only hold barely 1,500 people at a time. So citizens who wished to give voice to their many grievances with the Powers That Be had to:

(1) Schedule their exercise of First Amendment rights with the decidedly unsympathetic authorities.

(2) Report like cattle to the protest pen at their designated time, and only in the numbers authorized.

(3) Then, under the recorded surveillance of the authorities, feel free to let loose with all the speech they could utter within their allotted minutes (although no one--not Bush, not convention delegates, not the preening members of Congress, not the limousine-gliding corporate sponsors and certainly not the mass media--would be anywhere nearby to hear a single word of what they had to say).

Imagine how proud the Founders would be of this interpretation of their revolutionary work. The Democrats, always willing to learn useful tricks from the opposition, created their own "free-speech zone" when they gathered in Los Angeles that year for their convention.

Once ensconced in the White House, the Bushites institutionalized the art of dissing dissent, routinely dispatching the Secret Service to order local police to set up FSZs to quarantine protesters wherever Bush goes. The embedded media trooping dutifully behind him almost never cover this fascinating and truly newsworthy phenomenon, instead focusing almost entirely on spoon-fed soundbites from the President's press office.

An independent libertarian writer, however, James Bovard, chronicled George's splendid isolation from citizen protest in last December's issue of The American Conservative (www.amconmag.com). He wrote about Bill Neel, a retired steelworker who dared to raise his humble head at a 2002 Labor Day picnic in Pittsburgh, where Bush had gone to be photographed with worker-type people. Bill definitely did not fit the message of the day, for this 65-year-old was sporting a sign that said: The Bush Family Must Surely Love the Poor, They Made so Many of Us.

Ouch! Negative! Not acceptable! Must go!

Bill was standing in a crowd of pro-Bush people who were standing along the street where Bush's motorcade would pass. The Bush backers had all sorts of Hooray George-type signs. Those were totally okey-dokey with the Secret Service, but Neel's...well, it simply had to be removed.

He was told by the Pittsburgh cops to depart to the designated FSZ, a ballpark encased in a chain-link fence a third of a mile from Bush's (and the media's) path. Bill, that rambunctious rebel, refused to budge. So they arrested him for disorderly conduct, dispatched him to the luxury of a Pittsburgh jail and confiscated his offending sign.

At Bill's trial, a Pittsburgh detective testified that the Secret Service had instructed local police to confine "people that were making a statement pretty much against the President and his views." The district court judge not only tossed out the silly charges against Neel but scolded the prosecution: "I believe this is America. Whatever happened to 'I don't agree with you, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it'?"...

Read the rest of the article here
 
I feel soooooooo naive now; this stuff still shocks me. People: do read the full article. Hopefully you won't be as dazed as I am.

Perdita
 
Hooray for Bill.

this is just too sickening for words. I'm tired of People bending and folding the constitution for their own beliefs and whims.

For the leader of our nation to allow such nonsense to go on, really doesn't say much for him.

Conservatives I'm sure will justify it by saying it's as a safety measure for the president.

Others should be outraged.

Thanks for the article CQ.
 
in May of last year, the Homeland Security Department waded butt-deep into the murky waters of political suppression, issuing a terrorist advisory to local law enforcement agencies. It urged all police officials to keep a hawk-eyed watch on any homelanders who have "expressed dislike of attitudes and decisions of the US government."

Can re-education camps be far behind?
 
Clare Quilty said:
Can re-education camps be far behind?

Have you realised what happens at summer camps for pre-teens?

You are too late.

Og
 
Not just in camps, but in schools, too! I've heard rumours that American kids are brainwashed from an early age to swear holy (?) oaths of loyalty and allegiance to a piece of cloth.

The government is trying to brainwash its citizens into thinking that just because they're Americans, it means that their country is always right and always has the best moral/ideas/nehaviour/costumes/whatever, and that if anyone stands up and says "you know, I think we shouldn't do this, because it's wrong, and the rest of the world will hate us for it", will automatically be branded as Anti-American, a Traitor, or just plain Stupid.

Not being allowed to publically show that you don't agree with the President's politics, however, smells very much of Hungary in the 80'ies!

Next thing you know, there will be a law forbidding anyone to publically critizise Bush, be it just the color of his pants!

I believe Stalin did something similar, and right before his death, Russians were not only not allowed to write anything critical of the government; they were not allowed to write anything BUT praise for Stalin and his government! You couldn't even write a children's book about a happy puppy without including a note that the puppy was happy only because of Our Beloved Leader Stalin.

Americans, organize yourselves immediately, to get rid of the Bushes before the dictatorship is TOTAL!:(
 
This country has changed so much in the space of a few years, I don't recognize it anymore. I don't feel free. I feel like I'm leasing the illusion of freedom.

What's saddest, I think, is that a generation of kids who are coming of age during the Bush/Cheney years, will believe this is freedom. They will have bought the rhetoric that freedom is an ideal we protect by giving up some of our own, a little at a time. They won't know what it was like, and such a brief time ago, to know that as an American citizen you had absolute rights that no one could take away. Cages were for criminals, not Americans demanding to be heard.

Four years from now this kind of behavior won't even merit a discussion in this forum. Assuming we still have the right to be here.

Clare Quilty said:
Bush Zones Go National
by Jim Hightower

At the 2000 GOP nominating convention in Philadelphia, candidate Bush created a fenced-in, out-of-sight protest zone that could only hold barely 1,500 people at a time. So citizens who wished to give voice to their many grievances with the Powers That Be had to:

(1) Schedule their exercise of First Amendment rights with the decidedly unsympathetic authorities.

(2) Report like cattle to the protest pen at their designated time, and only in the numbers authorized.

(3) Then, under the recorded surveillance of the authorities, feel free to let loose with all the speech they could utter within their allotted minutes (although no one--not Bush, not convention delegates, not the preening members of Congress, not the limousine-gliding corporate sponsors and certainly not the mass media--would be anywhere nearby to hear a single word of what they had to say).

Imagine how proud the Founders would be of this interpretation of their revolutionary work. The Democrats, always willing to learn useful tricks from the opposition, created their own "free-speech zone" when they gathered in Los Angeles that year for their convention.

Once ensconced in the White House, the Bushites institutionalized the art of dissing dissent, routinely dispatching the Secret Service to order local police to set up FSZs to quarantine protesters wherever Bush goes. The embedded media trooping dutifully behind him almost never cover this fascinating and truly newsworthy phenomenon, instead focusing almost entirely on spoon-fed soundbites from the President's press office.

An independent libertarian writer, however, James Bovard, chronicled George's splendid isolation from citizen protest in last December's issue of The American Conservative (www.amconmag.com). He wrote about Bill Neel, a retired steelworker who dared to raise his humble head at a 2002 Labor Day picnic in Pittsburgh, where Bush had gone to be photographed with worker-type people. Bill definitely did not fit the message of the day, for this 65-year-old was sporting a sign that said: The Bush Family Must Surely Love the Poor, They Made so Many of Us.

Ouch! Negative! Not acceptable! Must go!

Bill was standing in a crowd of pro-Bush people who were standing along the street where Bush's motorcade would pass. The Bush backers had all sorts of Hooray George-type signs. Those were totally okey-dokey with the Secret Service, but Neel's...well, it simply had to be removed.

He was told by the Pittsburgh cops to depart to the designated FSZ, a ballpark encased in a chain-link fence a third of a mile from Bush's (and the media's) path. Bill, that rambunctious rebel, refused to budge. So they arrested him for disorderly conduct, dispatched him to the luxury of a Pittsburgh jail and confiscated his offending sign.

At Bill's trial, a Pittsburgh detective testified that the Secret Service had instructed local police to confine "people that were making a statement pretty much against the President and his views." The district court judge not only tossed out the silly charges against Neel but scolded the prosecution: "I believe this is America. Whatever happened to 'I don't agree with you, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it'?"...

Read the rest of the article here
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, a commonplace through out history.

People with power, in the words of Vlacav Havel, "treat any attempt at dissent as naked terrorism."

My offer to put any Lit refugees up for a few nights still stands.
 
rgraham666 said:
Unfortunately, a commonplace through out history.

People with power, in the words of Vlacav Havel, "treat any attempt at dissent as naked terrorism."

My offer to put any Lit refugees up for a few nights still stands.

I guess it's not new. Just new since Nixon and Mayor Daley. I'm repeatedly reminded this election season that we learned nothing from those awful years.
 
Back
Top