Weapons of mass-distraction....

SnoopDog

Lit's Little Beagle
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Posts
6,353
Recently it occured to me that women have a secret weapon of mass-distraction....THE STRING.

It's both hideous and ultra-effective.

How is a guy supposed to keep his concentration when he sees a hot girl bending over and her string-tanga peeking out of her low-cut jeans. (thnx to 'lovetoread' for the inspiration for this thread)

I mean this is driving men crazy, at least me.

Very mean, very evil ladies. Be ashamed !

Here's an example. (And before you flame me, it'S a pic I found on the net and NOT some random girl I photographed via my cellphone)

http://www.wolles-website.de/sammelsurium_tanga/paris-france.jpg

Snoopy
 
Last edited:
I like seeing a string peeping out of the bottom of their knickers too.
 
Personally, I never understood the appeal of something wedged up someone's ass...
 
Once I tried to pull one out, but was caught red-handed.
 
Sub Joe said:
Once I tried to pull one out, but was caught red-handed.
...groan...



Ok, back to strings... the one thing that makes the Visible String fashion unsexy is that it almost exlusively requires low cut tight pants. Like jeans. Which means I don't get to see the legs.
 
Ahh, the butt floss.

Not too entirely comfortable for me.

I've worn them for effect and to prevent lines in a tight pair of jeans, but given a choice I'd rather just go bare.


(What would that do for you, snoop? To see nothing hugging a lady's behind in low-slung jeans?) ;)
 
brightlyiburn said:
Personally, I never understood the appeal of something wedged up someone's ass...

Would you like me to explain it to you...?

Oh, you mean thongs.

:D
 
Re: Ahh, the butt floss.

sweetsubsarahh said:
Not too entirely comfortable for me.

I've worn them for effect and to prevent lines in a tight pair of jeans, but given a choice I'd rather just go bare.


(What would that do for you, snoop? To see nothing hugging a lady's behind in low-slung jeans?) ;)

Crack kills.
 
Re: Ahh, the butt floss.

sweetsubsarahh said:
(What would that do for you, snoop? To see nothing hugging a lady's behind in low-slung jeans?)
Get rid of the jeans too, and we'll talk.
 
Re: Ahh, the butt floss.

sweetsubsarahh said:
Not too entirely comfortable for me.

I've worn them for effect and to prevent lines in a tight pair of jeans, but given a choice I'd rather just go bare.


(What would that do for you, snoop? To see nothing hugging a lady's behind in low-slung jeans?) ;)

Oh boy, now you've done it. I won't be able to concentrate for a whole week now.

Snoopy
 
Re: Ahh, the butt floss.

sweetsubsarahh said:
Not too entirely comfortable for me.

I've worn them for effect and to prevent lines in a tight pair of jeans, but given a choice I'd rather just go bare.


(What would that do for you, snoop? To see nothing hugging a lady's behind in low-slung jeans?) ;)

I'm not Snoop, but to answer your question from my point of view. It would be very unhealthy, for me. I would keep walking into things like sign posts, telephone poles, etc.

Cat
 
carsonshepherd said:
Would you like me to explain it to you...?

Oh, you mean thongs.

:D

Okay, I can understand something up there for a short while. Just not all damn day. Especially since so many thongs are made of polyester or cotton/poly blends. Ick!
 
Re: Ahh, the butt floss.

SeaCat said:
I'm not Snoop, but to answer your question from my point of view. It would be very unhealthy, for me. I would keep walking into things like sign posts, telephone poles, etc.

Cat

I did that once. Not going to do it again.
 
Reminds me of what my father use to tell me.
"Boy, those who control rubber contol the economics of the world. Let them hold out long enough and cars do without tires, gaskets wear out and can't be replace. Now who controls the world? Women. They cut out the sex and men will be bending to their knees. They'll get what they want, when they want. Even rubber will be controlled." :D
 
Back
Top