Was 9/11 Just For Rich Men's Fun & Profit?

[Lovelynice]

In an open letter from David Hawkins to the London Market insurance brokers committee the cause for mass murder and fraud has been laid out for the destruction of the World Trade Center.
.

.

From:
David Hawkins,
Forensic Economist, Foundation Scholar, Cambridge University
British Columbia, Canada Tel: 604-542-0891

An open e-mail letter to:

David Hough, Executive Director
London Market Insurance Brokers' Committee

Copy:
Judi McLeod, Founder Editor, Canada Free Press
www.canadafreepress.com/

Steven Jones
Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University
Co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Jim Fetzer
Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy
Co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth www.st911.org/

Bcc

Date of sending: April 3, 2006

Dear Mr. Hough

Re: 9/11 - Bank Buys Broker for Concealed Demolition

In my e-mail to you titled, "Citigroup-AMEC 9/11 insurance fraud on Lloyd's of London?", I suggested that "Lloyd's convert its civil action in respect of alleged negligence by Citigroup-AMEC [in an alleged diesel-fueled fire leading to the destruction of WTC#7] into a RICO* suit in respect of apparent racketeering [including solicitation to murder], extortion, arson and insurance frauds .."
(Full text of letter at www.st911.org/ some excerpts below)

RICO* - Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization

We remind you that Lloyd's et al. have sued Citigroup-AMEC et al. in respect of the destruction of WTC#7 which with WTC#1 and 2, became the first three steel-framed buildings in history to collapse through fire on 9/11.
One of the directors of Citigroup is the disgraced former director of the C.I.A., John Deutch. Mr. Deutch is a director of Raytheon where he helped to destroy 'Able Danger' counter-intelligence data-mining evidence pointing at Mohammed Atta's and the other al-Qaeda cells in America a year before 9/11.
http://www.abledangerblog.com/2006/03/2004-raytheon-genesis-link-chart.html

Deutch's Citigroup is now arranging credit of $25 billion to help Cerberus Capital Management buy GMAC, the mortgage broker which allowed WTC leasholder, Larry Silverstein, to structure an alleged 'double occurrence' insurance fraud.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060403/gm_gmac.html?.v=9

Post 9/11, Mr. Silverstein claimed damages for two buildings (WTC# 1 & 2) but the, together with his Citigroup-AMEC and GMAC advisors, must have concealed from the court their prior knowledge that at least three WTC buildings (#1, 2 & 7) had been rigged for demolition with explosives and/or incendiaries.

If Mr. Silverstein did not know that the three WTC buildings were so rigged, he could not meaningfully have agreed with the officers of the New York Fire Department to 'pull' WTC building 7.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html

'Pull' is industry jargon for taking a building down with explosives.

To secure the WTC mortage, GMAC appears to have bought leaseholder-owned life insurance policies from Groupe Axa on behalf of mortgage investors, including, we suggest, Citigroup and various New York City Pension Funds ("NYPF") such as NY's Fire Department Pension Fund ("FDPF") and its Firefighters' Variable Supplements Fund ("FFVSF"), the latter being responsible for maximizing the retirement benefits of senior officers in the City fire department.
http://www.axa-financial.com/pressroom/2001/09172001_claims_announcement.html

Around March 2000, these New York City Pension Funds were plaintiffs in what we consider was a Mafia-directed racketeering class action suit* against Orbital Sciences of Dulles VA.

* In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Alexandria Division (Civil Action No. 99-197-A Jury trial demanded)

The NYPF suit appears to have been designed to extort mob control over war-gaming and insured-mortgage decision support technologies of Macdonald Dettwiler and Associates ('MDA') of Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.
http://www.mdacorporation.com/systems/defence.shtml
http://www.mdacorporation.com/news/pr/pr2001050301.html
http://www.mdacorporation.com/news/pr/pr2006010301.html
Following an out of court settlement, Orbital handed control of MDA to the CAI Private Equity group, custodian of the NYPF and many other labor union pension and insurance funds, thereby allowing 50 "prominent individuals" with CAI, Citigroup, GMAC and insiders to 'stage' hijackings for the 9/11 attack but conceal the subsequent demolitions in support of bogus insurance claims.
http://www.caifunds.com/specialinvestors.html
http://www.caifunds.com/successstories3.html#macdonald
After 9/11, CAI, Citigroup, GMAC and their affiliates in Groupe AXA appear to have collected death certificates from families of dead firefighters and paid out "dead-firefighter" life insurance policies to victims' pension fund.
http://www.axa-financial.com/pressroom/2001/09172001_claims_announcement.html

Deutch's Citigroup and GMAC appear to have conspired to use racketeering loans to finance 9/11 hijackings during bogus NORAD war games and divert attention from concealed demolitions and organized securities and insurance frauds.

New York firefighters with other City labor union members who missed, escaped or survived the 9/11 attacks, involuntarily profited from the deaths of their colleagues through AXA payments into their union pension and insurance funds.

City pension fund members are now at risk of being accused of participating in the 9/11 crimes and are therefore targets for racketeering and extortion.

We believe that Citigroup is buying GMAC to protect insider knowledge of the concealed demolitions of WTC buildings #1, 2 and 7 and the RICO activities of the CAI Private Equity Group members, who appear to be engaged directly or indirectly in murder, arson, racketeering and insurance frauds.

Once again, we invite you to forward this to your contacts at Lloyd's for consideration of a RICO suit against CAI's "50 prominent individuals" including the 9/11 insiders at Citigroup the bankers and GMAC the brokers.

Yours sincerely,


David Hawkins
British Columbia, Canada Tel: 604-542-0891

Notes:
"9/11 - Bank Buys Broker for CONCEALED DEMOLITION"

Silverstein's lawyers referred to .. near-simultaneous burnings four different courthouses by deranged man constituted 'multiple events .. Silverstein .. and partners .. borrowed $563 million from GMAC .. agreement to use insurance proceeds to pay off lender in trade center deal, the GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation"
http://www.greatgridlock.net/NYC/nycpress.html
"The World Trade Center leaseholder has won a court victory over his insurers .. A New York jury has decided that the 11 September 2001 attack on the two towers constituted two separate events. The US District Court ruling means Larry Silverstein could now get an extra $1.1bn (£0.56bn) from nine insurers to finance reconstruction. He has been fighting the insurance companies, arguing he was owed $7bn (£3.6bn) - double his $3.5bn policy."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4075053.stm

...

Exceprts from, "9/11 - A Citigroup-AMEC insurance fraud on Lloyd's of London?
..
by David Hawkins, Foundation Scholar, Cambridge University, Founder of the
Citizen's Association of Forensic Economists at Hawks' CAFE ..

"An open e-mail letter to: David Hough, Executive Director London Market Insurance Brokers' Committee"

...

"Underwriters at Lloyd's have an ongoing action to recover damages in respect of the alleged negligence by Citigroup Construction Defendants—AMEC PLC et al. ("Citigroup-AMEC") which defendants allegedly caused damage to a substation underneath World Trade Center building 7, that substation being the property of a Lloyds' insuree, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”).
http://www.total911.info/city_sj_motion.pdf

Lloyd's, with others, allege that Citigroup-AMEC was negligent in designing and installing the 7WTC water mains which ruptured and prevented firefighting and the 7WTC diesel generators, fuel lines and tanks which malfunctioned and fed fires causing an 'implosion' of the Con Ed substation.


We allege the Citigroup-AMEC partners sabotaged the diesel generators to feed fires lit by arsonists on the 11th, 12th or 13th floors of WTC7 where the Securities & Exchange Commission lost between 3,000 to 4,000 files. The SEC files contained evidence of insider trading by Citigroup-AMEC investment bank partners in the shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. The House Financial Services Committee was seeking information about the treatment Citigroup's Salmon Smith Barney investing banking division may have given WorldCom executives. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center and Citigroup says back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in 9/11. Citigroup subsequently paid $2.65 billion to the settlement class which purchased WorldCom securities during the period from April 1999 through June 2002.
http://www.thestreet.com/markets/matthewgoldstein/10036925.html
http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/press/2004/040510a.htm
At 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, 7 World Trade Center collapsed in its own footprint at a speed slightly slower than free fall under gravity in a manner consistent with a controlled demolition. Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris pile of WTC #1, 2 and 7. The thermal signature of 32 hot spots, 5 days and 10 days after the collapse, is consistent with all the buildings being rigged for demolition with an incendiary such as thermite.

We allege that the Citigroup-AMEC partnership now conspired to remove and destroy evidence of arson before filing bogus property insurance claims in an arrangement with Larry Silverstein and Silverstein Properties, including a claim for a double payment for the destruction of the Twin Towers. "Griffin quotes court documents to the effect that Silverstein had only $14 million invested in the insurance deal for the Twin Towers (compared to 50 times as much by his [off-book] lenders) through limited liability investment vehicles."
http://9-11-inquiry.blogspot.com/2005/03/march-2005-wtc-building-7-911-smoking.html
End of excerpts from "9/11 Citigroup-AMEC insurance fraud on Lloyds ...."


SOURCE:
http://www.stoplying.ca/articles/april06/money_trail_040906.htm

 

[Songcatcher]

Sum it up for me.

 

[Wok]

Sum it up for me.

"I wear a tinfoil hat"

 

[Lovelynice]

"I wear a tinfoil hat"

I already know you do.

You're one of the loony "Arabs did it" nutcase conspiracy theorists.

Have you checked out the ...

$1 Million Contest
http://www.reopen911.org/Contest.htm

$1 Million Contest Details

This is void where prohibited by law: including but not limited to Colorado , Maryland , Nebraska , North Dakota, Vermont, New Jersey and Tennessee. It is void anywhere prohibited by law.

The contest page supercedes all previous ones and all previous offers are withdrawn. 11-Nov-2005. Only one significant change has been made since the beginning except for clarification, point 12 about molten steel.

In response to challenges that one cannot prove a negative this paragraph has been added. There are several famous negative "proofs" that are accepted by the entire scientific community:

The Second Law of Thermodymanics.
The Heisenburg Principal

If I prove that I am at point A, that proves I am not at point B.

If one claims that there is an elephant in a room and we enter the room to find that it is empty, that proves there is not an elephant in the room.

For a more detailed debunking of, "you cannot prove a negative", See Article

This challenge has taken the form of the latter two logical statements above. When people say you cannot prove a negative, they are referring to statements like:

"This exists because there is no proof that it does not exist."


All explanations, in all parts of this contest must be supported with detailed drawings for all significant events. Particularly, explain and document with drawings and engineering the following video clips: 1) In this first video at 0:02 the puffs start below the collapse. 2) At 0:05 several floors blow out at the exact same time. 3) The explosions come in waves. 4) This 2rd video shows puffs coming out of floors far below the buckling section. 5) At 0:09 some puffs come out of single windows far below the collapse. Remember that the government claims that the elevator shafts were open chimneys so that would have been the path of least resistance to the blown out windows in the lobbies. 6) At 0:12 at the lower left corner of the building explodes ahead of the collapse. 7) This 3rd video, the collapse is not floor by floor as the left side explodes approximately 4 floors ahead of the right side at the corner, not the middle of the floor as the FEMA drawings show. 8) This north tower video the same. 9) This second North Tower video the demolition "squibs" of dust shooting out several floors below the "collapse". 10) In the this video the fireman describes how was EVERYTHING reduced to dust, everything. Not even standard controlled demolitions do that as building 7 showed. No building collapse has ever done that. Explain and document.

11) The second flash above and our screen saver show a video of pieces of the building flying UP and out over 100 meters with trails of smoke and dust following them (at 6.1 seconds you see the best example); provide details and drawings of how this happened including the trails of smoke and dust. Remember that steel is brittle, it does not flex like Iron. Therefore there is no possibility of it flexing enough to catapult itself upward.

12) This is a new requirement added on November 11, 2005: There are several published observations of molten metal in the basements of all three buildings, WTC 1, 2 and 7. For example,

Dr. Keith Eaton toured Ground Zero and stated in The Structural Engineer, "They showed us many fascinating slides [Eaton] continued, ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster." (Structural Engineer, September 3, 2002, p. 6; emphasis added.)

The observation of molten metal at Ground Zero was emphasized publicly by Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer responsible for the design of the World Trade Center Towers, who reported that "As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." (Williams, 2001, p. 3; emphasis added.)

Sarah Atlas was part of New Jersey's Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue and was one of the first on the scene at Ground Zero with her canine partner Anna. She reported in Penn Arts and Sciences, summer 2002, "'Nobody's going to be alive.' Fires burned and molten steel flowed in the pile of ruins still settling beneath her feet." (Penn, 2002; emphasis added.)

Dr. Allison Geyh was one of a team of public health investigators from Johns Hopkins who visited the WTC site after 9-11. She reported in the Late Fall 2001 issue of Magazine of Johns Hopkins Public Health, "In some pockets now being uncovered they are finding molten steel."

Since steel melts at approximately 2,800° Fahrenheit. The maximum temperature of a flame in open air is 1800 degrees F. FEMA and NIST claim a temperature of only 90O° Fahrenheit was reached to weaken the steel. Explain how the steel melted without explosives.

13) Entrants must prove how the trade towers steel structure was broken apart without explosives in 8.4 seconds. There is a sequence of photos in Eric Hufschmid's Painful Questions on pages 50 to 55 showing big steel beams falling in the air where the explosives are staying ahead of the falling beams. That shows exactly what the seismic data shows; namely, the explosives were shattering the building faster than the rubble was falling. The steel beams were falling at free fall speeds.

The formula for distance and time is:

s=½at²

Where:

s = distance in feet
a = gravitational constant: 32 ft/sec²
t = time in seconds.

The videos and seismic records show that the time of one structure's destruction was approximately 8.4 seconds though the complete settling of the building lasted slightly longer, perhaps as long as 12 seconds, but not long enough to account for anything but explosives.

s = ½ * 32 * 8.5²
s = 1156 feet

However, WTC 1 (the north tower) had a roof height of 1,368 feet. WTC 2 (the south tower) was nearly as tall, with a roof height of 1,362 feet. Each floor was therefore approximately 12.5 feet.

It is therefore proven that the towers' structures were destroyed at very close to free fall speed, perhaps faster since there is air resistance to consider. Impossible without explosives.

14) Since it is alleged that the floors pancaked down on each other crushing each floor as it went, entrants' must prove explosives were not used with a time line with the energy needed, mass affected, time to fall and time to break all of the hundreds of thousands of bolts, rivets and welds, crush all the concrete plus thousands of computers, desks, copy machines, all the office contents, the speed of the total falling mass after each impact, and net mass falling after each observed ejection of the dust clouds of concrete powder, and the energy required to send the cloud all the way to New Jersey in a self-contained flow (this alone requires 14 tons of explosives - the 14 tons paper must be disproved as part of this contest. 15) Contestants must show exactly how the concrete was pulverized and ejected with detailed drawings).

16) Force is a factor relative to resistance. For instance, we are on the earth's surface spinning around the earth's center at 1000 miles per hour. So we each have the POTENTIAL force of our individual masses being in a wreck at 1000 mph. But since we and most of the objects on the earth are all moving at the same relative speed, there is nothing for this force to work against and we are unharmed - in effect there is no force. The same holds true for the building collapses. The potential force to crush the concrete by the falling mass is relative to the resistance it meets. If there is no resistance, there is no crushing. If there is a little resistance, then there will be a little crushing, and so on, depending on the amount of resistance. If the bolts, rivets, and welds held, then the building would not continue to collapse. If the resistance of the bolts, rivets, and welds was less than the power needed to crush concrete, then the concrete would not have been crushed until the whole mass hit the ground. Entrants must prove that the steel bolts, rivets, and welds still had the resistance to stop the falling mass long enough for the concrete and contents to be crushed. Then they must explain what made them fail after the concrete was crushed. The timing is important since it takes time to do anything, especially to crush concrete, steel desks, etc. Entrants must include the energy required, source, resistance, and timing for breaking the bolts, rivets, welds, office contents, and concrete.

17) Entrants' must prove how the floors fell straight down so that each floor was crushed uniformly and how the pulverized dust was ejected from a steel pan with a steel plate and carpet over it. The official diagrams show each floor hitting in the middle of the lower floor. If so, then the concrete in the center might have been crushed, but not at the edges. Since all the concrete was pulverized, entrants must explain this in detail. Moreover, the graphic and video at the top of this page show that the collapses in that portion were not straight down: that the lower left corner is 4 or more stories ahead of the right. This must be explained in detail and, like every other significant point, with drawings and then the mechanism that changed the fall to straight down.

To disprove explosives were used, entrants must further :

18) Provide a time and heat transfer study of attainable temperatures within the core and perimeter columns based on best available data on fuel load, air supply, efficiency of combustion and the spatial and temporal extent of the fires, which the photographs and firemen's radio transmissions show were small.

19) Describe in detail what “additional local failures” took place, consistent with temperatures attained and initial damage.

20) Explain in detail how such local failures could lead to sudden and complete failure of all core columns.

21) Account for the highly symmetrical and near-vertical character of the collapses.

22) Describe the initiating event and mode of propagation of the final collapse, consistent with the observed progression of the collapses, including the near free-fall speed and (almost) complete disappearance of the core columns.

The first person to prove explosives were NOT used in all of the above with a full, detailed mathematical analysis covering all of the points above will receive $1,000,000. The proof will be subject to verification by a scientific panel of PHD engineers, physicists, and lawyers.

This offer is void where prohibited by law.

Jimmy Walter

mailto:jwalter@walden3.org?subject=Engineering Data

 

[Lovelynice]

Looks like nobody wants the $1 million.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Lovelynice]

"I wear a tinfoil hat"

This must be yours then... one of your official "Arabs did it" tin-foil hats as required by all believers in the 'official' fairytale...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v619/stillhoneymooning/TinFoilhat.jpg



(Psst...the tin-foil is really just another US government con - it's really plain old aluminium foil)

 

[ImpWizard]

Looks like nobody wants the $1 million.

Because the reality that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolitions can't be disproven. You can't change reality, but the shills can lie about it.

 

[ImpWizard]

"I wear a tinfoil hat"

Andddddddddd, she works for Sunshine Carpet Cleaning Company.

This must be yours then... one of your official "Arabs did it" tin-foil hats as required by all believers in the 'official' fairytale...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v619/stillhoneymooning/TinFoilhat.jpg



(Psst...the tin-foil is really just another US government con - it's really plain old aluminium foil)

Joaquin1975 works for Sunshine Carpet Cleaning Company? Is the tin-foil she's wearing a rule there? Goddamn she looks ugly for a chic

 

[Gringao]

In an open letter from David Hawkins to the London Market insurance brokers committee the cause for mass murder and fraud has been laid out for the destruction of the World Trade Center.
.

.

From:
David Hawkins,
Forensic Economist, Foundation Scholar, Cambridge University
British Columbia, Canada Tel: 604-542-0891

There is no Cambridge University in BC. I googled David Hawkins and he appears to be a standard-issue internet crank, straight out of Central Casting.

 

[Avery_Chisholm]

Sum it up for me.

LOL, eh

 

[Gringao]

Because the reality that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolitions can't be disproven. You can't change reality, but the shills can lie about it.

You can't disprove my theory, either: that the "jets" that hit them were, in reality, holographic images projected by spacecraft from the planet Zezic and that the damage done to the towers was really the result of Silly Putty accelerated to the speed of light by those crafts' pilots.

 

[miles]

There is no Cambridge University in BC. I googled David Hawkins and he appears to be a standard-issue internet crank, straight out of Central Casting.

LMAO!

Why am I not surprised?

 

[Gringao]

LMAO!

Why am I not surprised?

Google is our friend. Hawkins is a centurion in the tinfoil hat army. The good news is that you can subscribe to a steady stream of this surreal gibberish at Hawkins' website for a mere $100 a year.

Update: A search for "David Hawkins" at the University of Cambridge in the UK has similarly come up empty. Surprise, surprise...

 

[sigh]

You can't disprove my theory, either: that the "jets" that hit them were, in reality, holographic images projected by spacecraft from the planet Zezic and that the damage done to the towers was really the result of Silly Putty accelerated to the speed of light by those crafts' pilots.

YOUR theory? That was MY theory and you'll be hearing from my attorney as soon as I figure out who you are.

And if you don't think I'm serious, listen to this, buster. So far I've already whittled down your identity to a man from St. Louis. Bet you're getting worried now, huh?

Lovelynice is a Lovelynut. Back during the height of the war, her main source was the Iraqi Minister of Information. She and p_pman swore that the rapid success of American and British troops throughout Iraq and into Baghdad was all a media ruse, orchestrated by the American government. To be fair, she didn't use the same sort of long cut and paste material from various internet conspiracy sites that she's using today, but instead insisted that her perspective was fresh and unbiased because it came from Japanese media, but the effect was pretty much the same. In fact, she continued to swear that about up the time that Saddam's statue was toppled live on TV, and then she suddenly shut up about it.

Obviously she didn't learn anything from that humiliation, though.

 

[Gringao]

YOUR theory? That was MY theory and you'll be hearing from my attorney as soon as I figure out who you are.

And if you don't think I'm serious, listent to this, buster. So far I've already identity whittled down your identity to a man from St. Louis. Bet you're getting worried now, huh?

I thought yours had the towers coming down from specially-formulated tangerine Jell-0, superheated with lasers pilfered from Lawrence Livermore.

Lovelynice is a Lovelynut. Back during the height of the war, her main source was the Iraqi Minister of Information. She and p_pman swore that the rapid success of American and British troops throughout Iraq and into Baghdad was all a media ruse, orchestrated by the American government. To be fair, she didn't use the same sort of long cut and paste material from various internet conspiracy sites that she's using today, but instead insisted that her perspective was fresh and unbiased because it came from Japanese media, but the effect was pretty much the same. In fact, she continued to swear that about up the time that Saddam's statue was toppled live on TV, and then she suddenly shut up about it.

Obviously she didn't learn anything from that humiliation, though.

More is the fun for us!

 

[sigh]

I thought yours had the towers coming down from specially-formulated tangerine Jell-0, superheated with lasers pilfered from Lawrence Livermore.

That's a good one too, especially when you realize that Lawrence Livermore is a wholly owned subsidiary of Haliburton.

Makes ya think. You may say pilfered, but I know otherwise.

 

[Gringao]

That's a good one too, especially when you realize that Lawrence Livermore is a wholly owned subsidiary of Haliburton.

Makes ya think. You may say pilfered, but I know otherwise.

Cheney's hunting pal was about to blow the whistle, but Dick gave him a lead-shot preview of what would happen. I read it on Rense

 

[miles]

lovelywhatshername is just like woody and other loose-screw morons that pollute this place. They spew so much distorted bullshit that eventually it bites them firmly on the ass.

She'll lay low until she discovers some new Internet insanity. Sayonara, dumbass.

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

In fact, she continued to swear that about up the time that Saddam's statue was toppled live on TV,

Saddam's statue wasn't toppled by the Iraqi people. The hoax was blown about a week later. You DO know this, don't you?

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

Back during the height of the war, her main source was the Iraqi Minister of Information. .

I checked that with a search, and it seems that you're lying.

Maybe, you can provide a link to the specific quotes so that we can all see them in the context of your bullshit.

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

Google is our friend. Hawkins is a centurion in the tinfoil hat army. The good news is that you can subscribe to a steady stream of this surreal gibberish at Hawkins' website for a mere $100 a year.

Update: A search for "David Hawkins" at the University of Cambridge in the UK has similarly come up empty. Surprise, surprise...

David Hawkins

Damn there's a LOT of them from University of Cambridge in UK

9,300+ hits!

 

[Drinking Cap]

From:
David Hawkins,
Forensic Economist, Foundation Scholar, Cambridge University
British Columbia, Canada Tel: 604-542-0891

Well, LN, here's your chance to show all of us "Arabs did it" nuts just how sane and well sourced you are. This David Hawkins fellow, what is his association with Cambridge University? Is he a professor there? Did he graduate there? Gringao says he's just some nut, don't you have a responsibility to prove him wrong?

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

Google is our friend. Hawkins is a centurion in the tinfoil hat army. The good news is that you can subscribe to a steady stream of this surreal gibberish at Hawkins' website for a mere $100 a year.

Update: A search for "David Hawkins" at the University of Cambridge in the UK has similarly come up empty. Surprise, surprise...

Hell, when I looked I could find it.

 

[Fat_lot_of_good]

Cheney's hunting pal was about to blow the whistle, but Dick gave him a lead-shot preview of what would happen. I read it on Rense

Cite a link with your bullshit