snailspace
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2022
- Posts
- 2,332
Vivek Ramaswamy: Super Bowl Rigged for Chiefs so Taylor Swift Can Sway Presidency,
- Thread starter snailspace
- Start date
Rotadom
Satan's Plaything
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Posts
- 8,708
Andy Samberg knew.
YDB95
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 12,235
I don't see why you even need to ask that, just with Reichguide's posts today alone.
KeithD
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Posts
- 29,626
You don't feel the least bit silly for reposting this? Interesting.
Rotadom
Satan's Plaything
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Posts
- 8,708
"I'm just reporting!"
I ironically agree that they just might "Rig" the Super Bowl in favor of the Chiefs and the Taylor Swift connection, but obviously for different reasons than Vivek Ramajamabamalamswammy might think. I of course find Taylor Swift's music to be terminally boring- and I don't really care which political candidate she is stumping for.
I just think that, since the NFL is all about making money, they will do what they can to help the team that will make them the most money. That being, at the moment, Kansas City. If, say, Aaron Lewis and Staind had been huge Baltimore fans who attended every game and Lewis was dating a Raven-ette, AND Aaron Lewis was as popular as Taylor Swift is, then the NFL might have favored them last weekend (and liberal-minded conspiracy buffs might have cried foul there.)
But as it is, I watched the AFC championship game, and I saw several instances where Kansas City defensive backs tackled Baltimore receivers before they had any chance to catch the ball. According to the rules, and really 99 percent of the time, those plays would rightfully have been called defensive pass interference. Granted, the Ravens offense played so poorly I doubt that would have mattered in the end but had even one of those non-calls been called appropriately, the momentum could certainly have shifted.
Was the NFL, I wouldn't say "Rigging the game" but I will say, "Greasing the wheels" for the Chiefs last weekend? As an impartial observer with no ties to either team, I would say yes. It will be interesting to see how the Super Bowl will be officiated or whether we will see calls (or no-calls) constantly favoring one team over another.
I just think that, since the NFL is all about making money, they will do what they can to help the team that will make them the most money. That being, at the moment, Kansas City. If, say, Aaron Lewis and Staind had been huge Baltimore fans who attended every game and Lewis was dating a Raven-ette, AND Aaron Lewis was as popular as Taylor Swift is, then the NFL might have favored them last weekend (and liberal-minded conspiracy buffs might have cried foul there.)
But as it is, I watched the AFC championship game, and I saw several instances where Kansas City defensive backs tackled Baltimore receivers before they had any chance to catch the ball. According to the rules, and really 99 percent of the time, those plays would rightfully have been called defensive pass interference. Granted, the Ravens offense played so poorly I doubt that would have mattered in the end but had even one of those non-calls been called appropriately, the momentum could certainly have shifted.
Was the NFL, I wouldn't say "Rigging the game" but I will say, "Greasing the wheels" for the Chiefs last weekend? As an impartial observer with no ties to either team, I would say yes. It will be interesting to see how the Super Bowl will be officiated or whether we will see calls (or no-calls) constantly favoring one team over another.
Similar threads
