Virgin mother?

vsainat111

Experienced
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Posts
52
A Virgin Princess abducted by her own son from future, aiming for a pure genome for the future of the Empire

Initially she doesn't know that he's her son, and resists him, and there's a lot of delicious wooing. Later she falls for him and marries him, only to find out that he's her own son. She resists consummation, but he rapes her. With time, she submits to him and they sire beautiful children who all fuck each other.

The possibilities are endless - Incest, Romance, Non-Consensual, Recursive Time Travel, Male Dom, even BDSM (though i don't prefer much of it)

Anyone game?
 
i have a thought on your story idea what if the mother has a son that she adopted because she was unmarried and not able to have kids of her own and the son becomes depressed and lonely because he can't get laid so the mom being a good and loving mother decides to have sex with her son since he is a adopted technically it would not be incest of course
 
A Virgin Princess abducted by her own son from future, aiming for a pure genome for the future of the Empire ...
Sadly for oyur concept it would not create a pure genome. Read any basic book on genetics. Recessive genes would have a good chance of appearing. Look at the Egyptian dynasties where brother/sister marriage was compulsory for royalty, and so you got children who had only two grandparents, only two great-grandparents only two great-great-grandparents and so on.
 
Also, watch Back To The Future. If Marty got it on with his mother back in the 50s, his father would never have got to fuck her and Marty would never be born. And, if he doesn't get born, he doesn't go back and fuck his mother. Incestuous time-travel stories are just asking for trouble...
 
Also, watch Back To The Future. If Marty got it on with his mother back in the 50s, his father would never have got to fuck her and Marty would never be born. And, if he doesn't get born, he doesn't go back and fuck his mother. Incestuous time-travel stories are just asking for trouble...

but if he was his own father originally, he might start to flicker out of existence when she starts having second thoughts. He only forces her because he realizes that he will never be born if she doesn't go through with it.

And if he's his own dad, and hangs around to raise his children, how does he get along with himself? Does the kid self know the dad self is the same as him, or is there just a lot of "oh, you look so much like your father" awkwardness.

Also, can he be bi, so he can have sex with his son-self? (after the son-self turns 18, naturally)
 
but if he was his own father originally, he might start to flicker out of existence when she starts having second thoughts. He only forces her because he realizes that he will never be born if she doesn't go through with it.

And if he's his own dad, and hangs around to raise his children, how does he get along with himself? Does the kid self know the dad self is the same as him, or is there just a lot of "oh, you look so much like your father" awkwardness.

Also, can he be bi, so he can have sex with his son-self? (after the son-self turns 18, naturally)

Ah, yes. He's his own father. Very good.
 
Also, watch Back To The Future. If Marty got it on with his mother back in the 50s, his father would never have got to fuck her and Marty would never be born. And, if he doesn't get born, he doesn't go back and fuck his mother. Incestuous time-travel stories are just asking for trouble...
Maybe it wasn't incest, but that was confusing to me in Terminator 1.
John Connor's father was from the future yet died in the present, but if he died in the present, how could he come from the future and have sex with Sarah Connor?
 
A Virgin Princess abducted by her own son from future, aiming for a pure genome for the future of the Empire

Initially she doesn't know that he's her son, and resists him, and there's a lot of delicious wooing. Later she falls for him and marries him, only to find out that he's her own son. She resists consummation, but he rapes her. With time, she submits to him and they sire beautiful children who all fuck each other.

The possibilities are endless - Incest, Romance, Non-Consensual, Recursive Time Travel, Male Dom, even BDSM (though i don't prefer much of it)

Anyone game?
I like your story, only I'd change just a few things.
For the explanation of a virgin Princess, you could make her part of a harem in which case she would only be a half princess (the Zar's favorite).
The son's motivation could be slightly different than a pure bloodline.
Maybe he lives in a society where killing women at a certain age is the norm, until there are no women left for a good fuck (sex slave story).

He might also use her as a breeding template for all the men in the city (Dom/Sub).

As far as I know, abusive or violent rape is not allowed on Literotica, however you may use non consent that is objected to at first, but is consented to during.
 
If Marty got it on with his mother back in the 50s, his father would never have got to fuck her and Marty would never be born. And, if he doesn't get born, he doesn't go back and fuck his mother. Incestuous time-travel stories are just asking for trouble...

Not that this is a "good" example, by any means, but the cartoon Futurama has an episode where Fry becomes his own grandfather. "I did do the nasty in the pasty."

As long as a tale sounds plausible, it doesn't have to be 100% possible. After all, Sci-Fi writers are pioneers in their feild.

Someone (before Stoker) "invented" vampyres (my prefered spelling), someone else invented "day-walkers". Can they change into bats? Can they enter a room without an invitation? Can they cast a reflection in a mirror? Will any BRIGHT light KILL them? Only hurt them? The sun only?

Yes, no, and maybe to each question at any given time or any given tale. (I've read many published novels that all contradict one another.) You make your world what you want it to be.
 
Not that this is a "good" example, by any means, but the cartoon Futurama has an episode where Fry becomes his own grandfather. "I did do the nasty in the pasty."

As long as a tale sounds plausible, it doesn't have to be 100% possible. After all, Sci-Fi writers are pioneers in their feild.
The Futurama episode involved the Roswel crash and Area 51.

Fry got his great, great, great grandfather killed by an atom bomb after being attracted to his great, great, great grandmother.
Because he didn't disappear after the death of his grandfather, he assumed he was supposed to have sex with his grandmother.
He then became his own grandfather! :eek:

I don't know how plausable this sounds, but then again a talking sponge, flipping burgers under the sea doesn't sound plausable either.
In many episodes the ocean acts like air and no kid questions it.

By the way, I think he was supposed to be a sea sponge before they decided on a cleaning sponge.
 
Not that this is a "good" example, by any means, but the cartoon Futurama has an episode where Fry becomes his own grandfather. "I did do the nasty in the pasty."

As long as a tale sounds plausible, it doesn't have to be 100% possible. After all, Sci-Fi writers are pioneers in their feild.

Someone (before Stoker) "invented" vampyres (my prefered spelling), someone else invented "day-walkers". Can they change into bats? Can they enter a room without an invitation? Can they cast a reflection in a mirror? Will any BRIGHT light KILL them? Only hurt them? The sun only?

Yes, no, and maybe to each question at any given time or any given tale. (I've read many published novels that all contradict one another.) You make your world what you want it to be.

You're right about vampires, in that each individual writer makes up their own rules. The ones in Buffy are different from the ones in Twilight, which differ from the ones in True Blood, etc.

With time-travel, it's a bit different, because it's science, albeit theoretical. Generally, there seems to be two ways you can go - a single time-line or multiple time-lines.

The Back To The Future films operate the single time-line theory, in which case Marty would cease to exist if his mother and father didn't get it on at the right time. It's a paradox because if Marty kills his Dad in 1955, Marty won't be born, so how can he go back and kill his Dad? Very confusing.

The multiple time-line theory would allow Marty to go back and kill his Dad without ceasing to exist himself. He'd just create a new time-line in which his mother would marry someone else and life would go on. However, if Marty goes back to the future, it would be a different 1980s to the one he left, and he would have no place in it, as he doesn't have a birth certificate or anything, as he was never born in this time-line.

Still confusing, but slightly more logical.
 
Fry got his great, great, great grandfather killed by an atom bomb after being attracted to his great, great, great grandmother.

No true.

This is taken from the TV show's description of the episode Roswell That Ends Well:
While disguised as a soldier, Fry visits his grandfather, Enos, who is stationed at the base and engaged to Fry's grandmother. Near-accidents cause Fry to become obsessed with protecting Enos from possible harm as the grandfather paradox means that Fry will cease to exist if Enos is killed. Desperate to keep Enos safe from possible harm, Fry instead brings about his death by leaving him in a house located in the middle of a nuclear weapon testing range.

Despite Enos being killed, Fry still exists. He encounters and consoles his would-be grandmother Mildred. She propositions him, who deduces that since he is alive, Mildred must not have been his grandmother, and the two end up having sex. When the rest of the group finds him, Farnsworth insists that Mildred is indeed Fry's grandmother. Fry realizes that he is now his own grandfather and panics. Farnsworth gives up on noninterference as they are running out of time to get back to the future; Fry has already severely changed history, so what they do cannot matter.
 
No true.

This is taken from the TV show's description of the episode Roswell That Ends Well:

While disguised as a soldier, Fry visits his grandfather, Enos, who is stationed at the base and engaged to Fry's grandmother. Near-accidents cause Fry to become obsessed with protecting Enos from possible harm as the grandfather paradox means that Fry will cease to exist if Enos is killed. Desperate to keep Enos safe from possible harm, Fry instead brings about his death by leaving him in a house located in the middle of a nuclear weapon testing range.

Despite Enos being killed, Fry still exists. He encounters and consoles his would-be grandmother Mildred. She propositions him, who deduces that since he is alive, Mildred must not have been his grandmother, and the two end up having sex. When the rest of the group finds him, Farnsworth insists that Mildred is indeed Fry's grandmother. Fry realizes that he is now his own grandfather and panics. Farnsworth gives up on noninterference as they are running out of time to get back to the future; Fry has already severely changed history, so what they do cannot matter.
Fry (does he have a first name?) and his brother Nansy (lucky clover episode flawed) are children of the 70s, so I did use too many greats (thinking about Farnsworth) but then again his whole storyline doesn't make sense since their father grew up in the 30s or 40s and Roswel happened in the 50s.

Anyway, Mildred did come on to him, but after Enos (tribute to Gomer Pyle U.S.M.C. with Jim Neighbors) died, Fry became attracted to his grandmother, which is why he was contemplating having sex with her.
He assumed he was supposed to have sex with her or she wasn't really his grandmother.
Either way he'd be "getting some" that night.
 
Last edited:
Philip J Fry and his brother Yancy Jr were in their mid twenties in the year 2000. That makes them "children of the eighties"; most likely born around 1975/6.
 
Philip J Fry and his brother Yancy Jr were in their mid twenties in the year 2000. That makes them "children of the eighties"; most likely born around 1975/6.
Yancy (I knew Nansy didn't look right) was in his 30's (8 years older than Philip) when he had his son Philip J Fry Jr. (the pizza delivery boy was his uncle, thought to be dead).

Phil Senior was not born in the 80s, he was on a break dancing team then.
Their is no Junior in Yancy's name.
 
Once again, as always, you are a retard FO and this will be my last post directed towards you. Yancy Fry Jr was "about two years older than Fry (Philip J of the twentieth centruy)". The boys' father was Yancy Sr. In the year 2000, as this new series first begins, Phil was "in his mid twenties". Yes, his brother later named his little baby boy "after his dead uncle Philip" but that has nothing to do with anything as it hadn't been brought up before you chose to. Why I'm "debating" this with you, I do not know. :rolleyes: Call me a glutton for punishment. As always, I feel the brain cells being sucked away as you approach. Shame you came back. Just a shame.
 
Once again, as always, you are a retard FO and this will be my last post directed towards you. Yancy Fry Jr was "about two years older than Fry (Philip J of the twentieth centruy)". The boys' father was Yancy Sr. In the year 2000, as this new series first begins, Phil was "in his mid twenties". Yes, his brother later named his little baby boy "after his dead uncle Philip" but that has nothing to do with anything as it hadn't been brought up before you chose to. Why I'm "debating" this with you, I do not know. :rolleyes: Call me a glutton for punishment. As always, I feel the brain cells being sucked away as you approach. Shame you came back. Just a shame.
It's also a shame you are still an idiot.
I didn't come here again to speak with you! :mad:

This is not even the forum this should have been brought up idiot, you are also hijacking the thread by not letting this go, so SHUTUP AND GET OUT OF HERE IDIOT!

I am very sorry vsainat111 that we got off the subject a little.
Please don't let this deter you or the other people in this thread to discuss this story idea.
 
Last edited:
Anywho...

You're right about vampires, in that each individual writer makes up their own rules. The ones in Buffy are different from the ones in Twilight, which differ from the ones in True Blood, etc.

With time-travel, it's a bit different, because it's science, albeit theoretical. Generally, there seems to be two ways you can go - a single time-line or multiple time-lines.

The Back To The Future films operate the single time-line theory, in which case Marty would cease to exist if his mother and father didn't get it on at the right time. It's a paradox because if Marty kills his Dad in 1955, Marty won't be born, so how can he go back and kill his Dad? Very confusing.

The multiple time-line theory would allow Marty to go back and kill his Dad without ceasing to exist himself. He'd just create a new time-line in which his mother would marry someone else and life would go on. However, if Marty goes back to the future, it would be a different 1980s to the one he left, and he would have no place in it, as he doesn't have a birth certificate or anything, as he was never born in this time-line.

Still confusing, but slightly more logical.

I'll be the first to say that I do not know "all that science stuff", nor do I care to understand/write things like Back to the Future, Star Trek, and so on where they discuss time travel.

I was only pointing out that even with some "science fact" the author can still weave their own world as they see fit. Plausible can take the place of possible. Fiction is still fiction. (As with the case of Futurama. Or Stewie and Brian time traveling. Or the Futurama where they all discover the boxes of parallel universes - or is that universai. KIDDING.)


Anyway, when I first saw this thread name my mind went to Mary.
 
Back
Top