Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How much of a priority is realism for IR readers?How do you feel about the use of the "N" word in stories. Especially in interracial? Might give a sort of realism for the time or place. The use of the term "African American" might sound strange in 1960 Mississippi.
But for others, it may be that aspect of being taboo that makes it 'sizzle'. It's only a fantasy.There's a scene in the movie Storytelling where a young white woman played by the actress Selma Blair has sex with a black college professor. He has her strip for him, pushes her against a wall, and enters her from behind, and tells her to use the N word over and over as he has sex with her. It's far more uncomfortable than erotic. That would be my concern if I tried to use it in a story: it might just make everything too uncomfortable to be erotic.
But for others, it may be that aspect of being taboo that makes it 'sizzle'. It's only a fantasy.
I see. They're not racists, they're closet racists. You are what you eat. You are what you write. You are what you fantasise about.I am sure you are right.
Also, we cannot assume that everyone who feels that particular sizzle is necessarily racist. There is a countervailing impulse at work as well, with erotica and other types of fantasy. There are probably people who feel strong anti-racist impulses and who do not act racist in their day to day lives, but feel a desire to indulge this kink precisely because it runs counter to their morals and principles. That's part of how fantasy works. I have no doubt that there are progressive white women who have these fantasies about black men. Any fantasy you can imagine is probably one that somebody, somewhere has.
I'm not an omelette, I don't want to be raped, I don't want to drink anyone's blood or kill them. Pretty sure I am not what I fantasize about, or what I write. (Or what I eat, because digestion).I see. They're not racists, they're closet racists. You are what you eat. You are what you write. You are what you fantasise about.
Do you read them and masturbate?I write many, many things that I would never do, and that I would never approve of. I write them because they make good stories.
Did you read my reply?Do you read them and masturbate?
What if the writer intends that it should make the speaker the 'goodie'?It would jar to me, but context is everything, right? It will make the speaker into a "baddie" but it won't magically turn the reader into a raving racist.
I'm not an omelette, I don't want to be raped, I don't want to drink anyone's blood or kill them. Pretty sure I am not what I fantasize about, or what I write. (Or what I eat, because digestion).
Do you masturbate when you write them? Do you read them when you proofread? Do they arouse you?Did you read my reply?
I write them. I don't read them. Your statement is that "you are what you write," which I deny.
I'm fat, but I'm not an egg...and I ain't a vampire!What if the writer intends that it should make the speaker the 'goodie'?
When I was young we still had food rationing. We had a family meeting to discuss what we should do with the egg. The upside was all the girls looked like Audrey Hepburn. A girl with what is called a 'healthy figure' today we would call 'fatty'. It's an uncomfortable truth for many, that you are what you eat.
Do you masturbate when you write them? Do you read them when you proofread? Do they arouse you?
Suppose someone read your post above, do you think that they would think you are what you write, and do you doubt that they would be correct?Not every part. My stories tend to be complex. Some things in there arouse me, some things are in there to advance the plot. A lot of those things don't reflect things I'd do or say, nor do they reflect my fantasies. They reflect my characters' fantasies, behaviors, and ideas. Perhaps you don't differentiate between a writer and his characters, but if you don't, then I fear we lack the common ground to discuss this.
To bring this back on topic, let's suppose for a moment that I wanted to write a piece of social commentary. I don't, so I wouldn't, but bear with me. In my piece, I want to make some sort of trenchant comment about race and language, or whatever. I'm gearing my work for an audience that I don't imagine has much direct experience with racism.
So, in an attempt to shock, let's say I use the N-word in that piece.
You seem to be implying that the fact I've used that word reflects some degree of racism within me, or at least some sort of desire to use that word frivolously. When, in fact, my use of that word in that context has been considered very carefully, and when it does not reflect my beliefs. In fact, I'm using it in a conscious effort to repudiate the use of that word.
Can you see that, perhaps, "you are what you write" might be a very facile way to look at a word as complicated as the N-word? Or, indeed, at other aspects of complicated stories?
Suppose someone read your post above, do you think that they would think you are what you write, and do you doubt that they would be correct?
Or a chat in the pub or on the train, within a few minutes of hearing the product of your imagination people will have a fair idea of who you are. It's not for no reason that people post their most intimate fantasies anonymously.Are you incapable of differentiating between a post on a forum, vs a creative-writing exercise?
I'm beginning to think I was right. I think we lack the common ground to even discuss this.