US fights proxy war with Russia over control of Syria's oil fields.

[Mike_Yates]

The United States has started a full-on proxy war against the Russian federation in Syria in a fight to see who will seize control over Syria's oil fields and which companies will reap the profits.

https://truthernews.wordpress.com/2...strike-on-us-andor-russian-based-attackinvas/

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Would you contact TrutherNews and let them know the US has all the oil it needs...

 

[Mike_Yates]

Would you contact TrutherNews and let them know the US has all the oil it needs...

More is never enough.

Just think about how many hundreds of billions of dollars could be made if we pillaged Syria for their oil?

Rival companies in US/Russia are in a race to see who can get to it first, and it just got very ugly.

Certain stocks will benefit immensely and a handful of inside traders will exploit those stocks and become stupid rich.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

How much more cost effective would it be to buy it from Israel? or Canada? or Mexico? or Brazil? or Saudi Arabia?

 

[ishtat]

Syria is the world's 68th largest oil producer, ranked after Papua Ne Guinea producing less than 1 tenth of 1% of the worlds oil. ie. fuck all.

 

[cleaver]

How much more cost effective would it be to buy it from Israel? or Canada? or Mexico? or Brazil? or Saudi Arabia?

how cost effective is it to try to expropriate ( by force )
what in peace time
accounted for less than 1/2 % of world production daily...

mike's op is posed to read as if the two superpowers
were sparring for to do just that...

although... in truth, mikey's twisted op is somewhat true...

the goal in controlling syria's oil
(persued by a coalition and now russia)
is not to expropriate it
but to keep the profits in selling it
out of isis' hands...

oil is the currency of the scourge...
so...?

controlling it is the tactical goal

if isis is the target,
cut off the money.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Russia is there to prop up sales of arms.

No more, no less.



Okay, wresting dominance form the US in the region might be just some sort of an afterthought considering how glibly that responsibility was tossed aside...

 

[Que]

how cost effective is it to try to expropriate ( by force )
what in peace time
accounted for less than 1/2 % of world production daily...

mike's op is posed to read as if the two superpowers
were sparring for to do just that...

although... in truth, mikey's twisted op is somewhat true...

the goal in controlling syria's oil
(persued by a coalition and now russia)
is not to expropriate it
but to keep the profits in selling it
out of isis' hands...

oil is the currency of the scourge...
so...?

controlling it is the tactical goal

if isis is the target,
cut off the money.

Interesting.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Russia is not fighting ISIS.

That was just a gambit. They are targeting the extremists that we trained in the sad and sorry belief that we could control them once they won...

 

[kbate]

Russia is well aware that a win by any of the groups involved in Syria other than the Assad regime is a loss for them. Their bases will be shuttered, and their influence will be zero if ISIS wins or if the Iranian backed rebels win, or if the kurdish backed rebels win, or if the turkish backed anti-rebels win, or if the us backed Iraqi kurdish anti-ISIs rebels win or if any UK backed group at all wins.

We're much the same. In the end, Iran wins and on to Yemen and then the big prize, Arabia.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Obama and Putin conspire to keep Israel in its cage.

 

[HoHoBomb]

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user92183/imageroot/2015/09/PutinPopocorn_0.png​

 

[Mike_Yates]

how cost effective is it to try to expropriate ( by force )
what in peace time
accounted for less than 1/2 % of world production daily...

mike's op is posed to read as if the two superpowers
were sparring for to do just that...

although... in truth, mikey's twisted op is somewhat true...

the goal in controlling syria's oil
(persued by a coalition and now russia)
is not to expropriate it
but to keep the profits in selling it
out of isis' hands...

oil is the currency of the scourge...
so...?

controlling it is the tactical goal

if isis is the target,
cut off the money.

Sorry, i didn't realize that, I was just making a brash assumption because whenever I think about US military action in the middle-east the first thing that comes to my mind is oil profits/international corporate interests.

If it isn't oil, there must be something else there that US/Russia wants, badly. What other natural resources does Syria have? What about minerals, natural gas, and precious metals?

In July of 2014, western intelligence/NATO (I would assume) orchestrated an elaborate false flag operation by trying to blame Russia for having shot down a civilian passenger plane (MH17) very shortly after the Russian federation halted an invasion of Syria by US proxies.

Also in 2014, there was another very likely false flag operation where Syria was blamed for using chemical weapons against civilians.

Of course, that's not the first time a false flag op has been used and sold as a pretext for war. History is littered with literally hundreds of similar incidents, even dating back to ancient times.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Obama wanted the prestige of toppling another Middle Eastern dictator that had been propped up by the Imperial, Colonial, United Sates.



You cannot see that? Why do you think he is joining the iSlammers to gang up on Israel? He told our top people to not attend Bibi's speech to the UN. It's not about oil, it's about retreat.

 

[Mike_Yates]

American-involved wars have extremely little to absolutely nothing to do with national defense, no matter which way you look at it, it ALWAYS boils down to money, power, and corporate interests.

Much of the world is politically run by private industry, as in, completely.....

 

[OjosMojo]

Russia is well aware that a win by any of the groups involved in Syria other than the Assad regime is a loss for them. Their bases will be shuttered, and their influence will be zero if ISIS wins or if the Iranian backed rebels win, or if the kurdish backed rebels win, or if the turkish backed anti-rebels win, or if the us backed Iraqi kurdish anti-ISIs rebels win or if any UK backed group at all wins.

We're much the same. In the end, Iran wins and on to Yemen and then the big prize, Arabia.

The Twelvers are Assad's staunchest allies and have been since, like, forever. The Iranians and their terrorist arm Hezbollah are now on the ground in Syria fighting alongside Russia against all Assad's foes.

There are no "Iranian backed rebels" in Syria.

 

[Mike_Yates]

http://truedemocracyparty.net/wp-content/uploads/exxon_dees1.jpg

 

[kbate]

The Twelvers are Assad's staunchest allies and have been since, like, forever. The Iranians and their terrorist arm Hezbollah are now on the ground in Syria fighting alongside Russia against all Assad's foes.

There are no "Iranian backed rebels" in Syria.

Calling you a moron would be an insult to decent every day morons.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Calling you a moron would be an insult to decent every day morons.

Yeah!


DON'T PISS ME OFF!