Ursula K. Le Guin

Way ahead of the curve. She wrote about a school for wizards while Rowling was still a child

The left hand of darkness dealt with a race/world where gender was fluid.

To me her major accomplishment, wasn't so much her books themselves, but she entered into a genre dominated by men and made it her own.
 
EDITED: Because I confused Ursula with Madeline, and now I feel like a doofus. I remember Eye of the Heron being pretty great though.
 
Last edited:
She was an amazing writer, in her own class. "The Left Hand of Darkness" made a huge impression on me when I read it.
 
She was an amazing writer, in her own class. "The Left Hand of Darkness" made a huge impression on me when I read it.

Saturday I gave the book over to a library so they could sell it, after I purchased it from the same library (I think). Maybe because I'm old enough and have gone through enough that the subject didn't faze me.

I read the book and kept waiting for something to happen, especially at the end, but aside from the androgynous inhabitants, it didn't do anything for me.

But what do I know? It won a two awards in the same year.
 
She was an amazing writer, in her own class. "The Left Hand of Darkness" made a huge impression on me when I read it.

I didn't read this book until 2016. It wasn't one I would have chosen or even in a genre that I would have looked at. But, I was glad that it was assigned and, by the time I finished, I fell in love with.


It's one of those books I intend to read again.
 
George Orr is very sad. But, then, he probably dreamed of her death and then it happened.

I always loved the affective dreams theme and "The Lathe of Heaven" did it like no other. The PBS movie of it, produced in 1980 and largely with the blessing and supervision is a gem. After having seen it when first released, I looked for years before finally finding it on DVD.
 
As a kid, I was a big sf fan when she was most active, and I read her stuff; it didn't get to me all that much; it didn't taste like science fiction to me. But her ideas were really original. Reading about her life, she seemed like a very cool person; perhaps I was a bit too narrow in my tastes.

Perhaps if she were writing nowadays she'd more likely be placed along with Margaret Atwood.

PS Let's not forget Mary Shelley.
 
Back
Top