TheEarl
Occasional visitor
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2002
- Posts
- 9,808
I've recently been working on one of my idle fantasies. No, not the one with the syncronised swimmers and the strawberry yoghurt. This is one where I finally decide what I'm gonna do and end up becoming a sports journalist.
So have been writing articles for small websites and then saw an advertisement in the Daily Telegraph about a competition for young sports writers. Trick is the entry is to write a report about your most memorable sporting moment that is less than 100 words. My first draft was 1300.
I have got it down to 100 now (after writing a second, very terse first draft thta was only 384!), but I think that's ridiculous. I can write 100 good words without trying, in fact, I can write 300 good words without trying. It's bloody hard to condense one emotion into 100 words, let alone all the emotions I experience in a good game of rugby. If 100 words is a challenge to anyone, then they should not be entering a competition to win a place in the Telegraph sports team.
More than that, I'm not sure what anyone can tell from 100 words. They can see I have a command of the English language and that I've managed to convey my points across, but they don't know anything about my descriptive language or my encyclopedic knowledge of English rugby.
And what really bites is that I had a really, really good version that was only 109 words. And I had to reduce the quality to get it down to 100. That just sucks.
/vent
The Earl
So have been writing articles for small websites and then saw an advertisement in the Daily Telegraph about a competition for young sports writers. Trick is the entry is to write a report about your most memorable sporting moment that is less than 100 words. My first draft was 1300.
I have got it down to 100 now (after writing a second, very terse first draft thta was only 384!), but I think that's ridiculous. I can write 100 good words without trying, in fact, I can write 300 good words without trying. It's bloody hard to condense one emotion into 100 words, let alone all the emotions I experience in a good game of rugby. If 100 words is a challenge to anyone, then they should not be entering a competition to win a place in the Telegraph sports team.
More than that, I'm not sure what anyone can tell from 100 words. They can see I have a command of the English language and that I've managed to convey my points across, but they don't know anything about my descriptive language or my encyclopedic knowledge of English rugby.
And what really bites is that I had a really, really good version that was only 109 words. And I had to reduce the quality to get it down to 100. That just sucks.
/vent
The Earl