Two Chicago Men Charged in Alleged Danish Terror Plot

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
By Andrew M. Harris and Christian Wienberg

Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) -- Two Chicago men were charged with plotting to attack “facilities and employees” of a Danish newspaper that printed cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad in 2005, a federal prosecutor said.

David Coleman Headley, 49, and Tahawwur Hussain Rana, 48, were accused of conspiring to assist in or perpetrate terrorist acts against the newspaper’s facilities, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago said today in a statement.

Headley was arrested on Oct. 3 by the FBI’s joint terrorism task force. Rana, a Canadian citizen, was apprehended Oct. 18 at his home. They have been in federal custody since their arrests, prosecutors said.

“The criminal complaints unsealed today have exposed a serious plot against overseas targets by two Chicago-based men working with Pakistani-based terrorist organizations,” Fitzgerald said.

The alleged plot to stage one or more attacks on the facilities of the Danish paper, Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, was referred to by Headley as the “Mickey Mouse Project” in coded communications with alleged accomplices, the prosecutor said.

Headley, charged with conspiracy to murder or maim people abroad, faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment if convicted. Both men were charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorism, punishable by as long as 15 years in prison.

‘Respected Businessman’ :rolleyes:

“Mr. Rana is a well respected businessman in the Chicagoland community,” his defense attorney, Patrick Blegen, said in a phone interview, referring to the Chicago metropolitan area. “He adamantly denies the charges and eagerly awaits his opportunity to contest them in court.”

Rana, who Blegen said has lived in Chicago for more than 10 years, manages an immigration services business and a Halal meat processing business in Kinsman, Illinois, about 80 miles southwest of Chicago.

An attorney for Headley, John Theis, declined to comment today on prosecutors’ claims. “We’re still processing the allegations,” he said.

Headley was arrested at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport before boarding a flight to Philadelphia, where he intended to travel on to Pakistan, according to Fitzgerald’s statement.

Danish Trip

Headley allegedly visited two different Jyllands-Posten offices in January, one in Copenhagen and another in Viby, Denmark. At the Copenhagen site, he told employees he was visiting on behalf of First World Immigration Services -- the business managed by Rana -- which was considering opening offices in that country and advertising in the newspaper, prosecutors said.

Jakob Scharf, director general of the Danish Security and Intelligence Service, said his agency viewed the alleged plot “very seriously.”

“One of the arrested individuals has an extensive network that includes leading militant extremists in Pakistan who not only wish to strike against Denmark, but who have previously proven capable of performing ruthless acts of terrorism,” Scharf said in a statement.

The main targets were the newspaper’s Viby and Copenhagen offices, Scharf said today at a press conference. Kurt Westergaard, the cartoonist who drew the picture of Muhammad wearing a bomb in his turban, and Flemming Rose, an editor at the newspaper who was responsible for printing the drawings, were two specific targets of the planned attack, Scharf said.

Hand Weapons, Explosives

The planned attacks would have involved “hand weapons and explosives,” Scharf said.

“We’re continuing the investigations and can’t rule out that it will lead to more arrests,” Scharf said. “We want to emphasize that the attacks probably weren’t imminent.”

In September 2005, Jyllands-Posten published a set of 12 political cartoons that included several depictions of Muhammad. The caricatures touched off protests, first in Denmark and later across Europe and throughout the Islamic world, where any images of the prophet are considered blasphemous.

The Danish security agency, known by the acronym PET, worked closely with the FBI on its investigation, he said.

Headley, according to U.S. prosecutors, traveled this year to Pakistan, where he met with other alleged plotters including Ilyas Kashmiri, who has alleged links to the al Qaeda international terrorist organization.

Pakistani Group

Upon his arrest, Headley told FBI agents that he had started working with the Pakistani group Lashkar-e-Taiba before 2006, according to the criminal complaint against him that was unsealed today. The group was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department in 2001, prosecutors said.

Headley, who prosecutors said changed his name from Daood Gilani in 2006, also told agents that he scouted the Jyllands- Posten offices “in preparation for an attack to be carried out by persons associated with Kashmiri and another unidentified individual.

“This was very worrying information,” Joern Mikkelsen, editor-in-chief of the Viby-based newspaper said in a statement on the daily’s Web site. “We’re in close contact with the PET as we have been on a running basis the past four years since the Muhammad crisis started.”

Mikkelsen said the newspaper is following PET’s recommendations closely. “This is very unpleasant for all our employees and we are all deeply moved by the threats,” he said.

Rana is scheduled to appear in federal court in Chicago tomorrow for a bail hearing, according to Randall Samborn, a Fitzgerald spokesman. Headley’s bail hearing is scheduled for Dec. 4, Samborn said.

The cases are U.S. v. Headley, 09cr830 and U.S. v. Rana, 09cr849, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago).
 
MARK STEYN ON TERRORISM: “Two US residents, one an American citizen, one a Canadian citizen, educated and assimilated, and enjoying a nice enough living to be able to afford to fly to Demark to kill a couple of guys over a cartoon. In the long run, Afghan cave-dwellers and Waziristani goatherds are less of a threat than fellows like Messrs Headley and Rana. The company name – ‘First World Immigration Services’ – is a rather droll jest.” This behavior has been empowered and encouraged by the cowardice of enablers at places like Yale University.
 
US citizens

Respected businessmen

PISSED AT A CARTOON and wanna commit JIHAD?

So the next time I say KILL EM ALL, dont you DARE say, there are good MOOSEFUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad:
 
I like the ones with the cream cheese in the middle. You always get them at business breakfast meetings.
 
Right fucking on!

I always AXE those that say

ONLY A FEW

NOT ALL

There are good Moosefucks


WHERE??????

SHOW ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TELL ME HOW ONE CAN TELL EM APART!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


They can never ever answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CAN THEY???????????????

KILL EM ALL!:cool:
 
Two fucking businessmen, enjoying all the fruits of a free society

PISSED AT FUCKING CARTOONS AND WANNA KILL!!!!!!!!!!!!


What do they have in common?

ISLAM!


KILL EM ALL!
 
Concentrate on police and intelligence work worldwide, not blowing up goatherds.

That means we have to be RIGHT EVERY SINGLE TIME, they have to be right ONCE or TWICE

that means the LIBZ, like YOU have to stop SCREAMING about the PAT ACT and WIRE TAPPS ect etc etc

NEVER HAPPEN, YOU KNOW IT

Bad answer, what do we do?
 
That means we have to be RIGHT EVERY SINGLE TIME, they have to be right ONCE or TWICE

that means the LIBZ, like YOU have to stop SCREAMING about the PAT ACT and WIRE TAPPS ect etc etc

NEVER HAPPEN, YOU KNOW IT

Bad answer, what do we do?

So you are OK with the Patriot Act under a lib government? Aren't you worried about abuses?
 
If you recall

When it was enacted

SOMEPLACE and I had a debate

She said there will be abuses

I said, EVERY LAW EVER PASSED WILL BE ABUSED, Yes, there will be

But the UPSIDE is too great, we have to live with the downside

Shame on the people who will let it get out of hand

WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER, WHAT DO WE DO?

So far you havent answered!

I know, you cant KILL EM ALL!

I would kill em all!

But, what is the answer?
 
If you recall

When it was enacted

SOMEPLACE and I had a debate

She said there will be abuses

I said, EVERY LAW EVER PASSED WILL BE ABUSED, Yes, there will be

But the UPSIDE is too great, we have to live with the downside

Shame on the people who will let it get out of hand

WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER, WHAT DO WE DO?

So far you havent answered!

I know, you cant KILL EM ALL!

I would kill em all!

But, what is the answer?

I gave my answer, you didn't like it. It's still my answer.

BTW, did you catch John Boehner saying that NY23 was "a bit of a mess"?
 
Your answer is putting one finger

in a dike with 98 holes

you satisfied with that?

IM NOT!

ARE YOU?
 
what freedoms have been ACTUALLY lost (as opposed to pretend/made up stuff)

how many DEAD are YOU willing to have, how many cities destroyed, are you INCUDING your FAMILY members among the dead?

I gotta go

I assume you will have answer when I get back:rolleyes:
 
what freedoms have been ACTUALLY lost (as opposed to pretend/made up stuff)

how many DEAD are YOU willing to have, how many cities destroyed, are you INCUDING your FAMILY members among the dead?

I gotta go

I assume you will have answer when I get back:rolleyes:

I live in NYC busy. When they finally set off that stolen 50MT Soviet nuke, I'm first in line for the Pearly Gates.

If you want to mock the Bush-era abuses as "made-up stuff", that's fine, but it detracts from your own credibility when complaining about Obama.
 
Where's the old "better to die on your feet than live on your knees" spirit?

I usually associate liberals with craving security at all costs.
You seem contented to sit there while the terrorists attack us, and will go down saying, "at least I still have the freedom to communicate with foreign terrorists without the government intercepting it."

If you're going to defend a principle, make it a good one. :rolleyes:
 
You seem contented to sit there while the terrorists attack us, and will go down saying, "at least I still have the freedom to communicate with foreign terrorists without the government intercepting it."

If you're going to defend a principle, make it a good one. :rolleyes:

I'm all for fighting them. We just disagree on the best way to go about it.
 
I live in NYC busy. When they finally set off that stolen 50MT Soviet nuke, I'm first in line for the Pearly Gates.

If you want to mock the Bush-era abuses as "made-up stuff", that's fine, but it detracts from your own credibility when complaining about Obama.

Where did I bash BAM on this one?

tell me what FREEDOMS were lost and by whom under Bush, dont mock me and say I pretend, I AXING!



PS, when the NOTED FAG, Feinstein didnt wanna vote to renew the PAT ACT, cause of ABUSES etc, she AXED the ACLU to show ACTUAL ABUSE etc and WHO ws harmed


THEY COULDNT SHOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Im not saying there wasnt,

Im AXIN you to show me FACT, not made up stuff


and you are essentially saying

Im gonna be blown up, and I wont do shit about it, other then MAYBE send a few cops after 1.5 BILLION MOOSEFUCKS
 
Back
Top