Two butch lesbians accepted into Army's Ranger program

someone's been asking for trouble, it seems, Lool …
You'll have the board fems come in shortly, to beat the crap out of you… Oh, and a troll magnet too, for the board misogynists who drool over such things…
 
hi

where is the issue here?If they are trained and fit to do their job, let them be.
 
Anyone else think it's unfair that they passed all the same tests as the men but still aren't allowed to serve in the regiment? Surely they've earned the right like anyone else?
 
Anyone else think it's unfair that they passed all the same tests as the men but still aren't allowed to serve in the regiment? Surely they've earned the right like anyone else?

I agree with statement 100%
 
Two raging bull dykes are accepted into the Army's Ranger program.

At this level of such extreme masculine lesbianism, they are in every possible sense, men trapped inside of female bodies.

Speaking of, Heathyr Hoffman has an affinity for butch dykes.

http://www.voanews.com/content/first-women-graduate-elite-army-ranger-school/2926636.html

I would like to see you call either one of these solders a raging bull dyke to their face. Then I would enjoy watching either one of them kick you candy ass.
 
where is the issue here?If they are trained and fit to do their job, let them be.

Anyone else think it's unfair that they passed all the same tests as the men but still aren't allowed to serve in the regiment? Surely they've earned the right like anyone else?

That's the lie....they didn't pass the same test/standards. They got special female standards that are like, SAD compared to their male counterparts.

Their tabs are participation trophies, they shouldn't be allowed in bat until they meet standards. Regiment standards....not congress critter fairness standards.

I would like to see you call either one of these solders a raging bull dyke to their face. Then I would enjoy watching either one of them kick you candy ass.

Wish I could, I'd even drive up to Ft.Lewis ....give me a ring and I'll show you exactly why they shouldn't be allowed in regiment if I even got a chance, the guys in 2nd bat would be foaming at the mouth to crush them.
 
Last edited:
That's the lie....they didn't pass the same test/standards. They got special female standards that are like, SAD compared to their male counterparts.

Their tabs are participation trophies, they shouldn't be allowed in bat until they meet standards. Regiment standards....not congress critter fairness standards.



Wish I could, I'd even drive up to Ft.Lewis ....give me a ring and I'll show you exactly why they shouldn't be allowed in regiment if I even got a chance, the guys in 2nd bat would be foaming at the mouth to crush them.

The last I heard, the army was saying the standards were not changed for them. May or may not be true but that's what they're saying.
 
One Ranger writes

Closure:

"No matter what we at Ranger School say, the non-believers will still be non-believers. We could have invited each of you to guest walk the entire course, and you would still not believe, we could have video recorded every patrol and you would still say that we “gave” it away. Nothing we say will change your opinion. I and the rest of our cadre are proud of the conduct of our soldiers, NCOs, and officers; they took the mission assigned and performed to the Ranger standard. Rangers Lead the Way!"
 
This is great. I have another reason to hate women.

I've been collecting them, and there are plenty on this site.
 
That's the lie....they didn't pass the same test/standards. They got special female standards that are like, SAD compared to their male counterparts.

Their tabs are participation trophies, they shouldn't be allowed in bat until they meet standards. Regiment standards....not congress critter fairness standards.



Wish I could, I'd even drive up to Ft.Lewis ....give me a ring and I'll show you exactly why they shouldn't be allowed in regiment if I even got a chance, the guys in 2nd bat would be foaming at the mouth to crush them.

The two female graduates had to pass the same standards as the men to earn the Ranger tab. That included carrying the same amount of weight, completing tasks in the same amount of time and requiring approval from their peers during leadership exercises.

it's being reported and officers are being quoted across national media that they were held to the same testing standards as the male counterparts. where do you get off accusing them of being less?

as to mike, you wouldn't know what to do with a live woman in front of you, much less a woman who could end you in her sleep.
 
The last I heard, the army was saying the standards were not changed for them. May or may not be true but that's what they're saying.

it's being reported and officers are being quoted across national media that they were held to the same testing standards as the male counterparts. where do you get off accusing them of being less?

as to mike, you wouldn't know what to do with a live woman in front of you, much less a woman who could end you in her sleep.

Check those "standards" ....they are skewed from the baseline.

http://www.apft-standards.com/

I'll believe they were held to the same standard as their male counterparts when I see their raw PFT scores and they are even remotely close to the males. ;)

If they really did do it to standard then kudo's....but I'm willing to bet 'standards' have been adjusted for females. They didn't 'review' them into being harder every single woman that tried just flat out getting their shit pushed in, for 4 years. 98 graduates? That's pretty high % of a 130~ person company sized class making it. Used to wash damn near 1/2 the class out.......gee I wonder what's changed :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The army plans to activate the old Rainbow Division for Gays and the God Knows Whats.
 
Back
Top