butters
High on a Hill
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Posts
- 85,797
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...financial-statements/ar-AATQEhG?ocid=msedgntp
the problem, for me, is here:
do other people committing this kind of extensive fraud get away with just fines? is it something the DOJ can take up if they've a stomach for it? closing down some of his enterprises will hurt but the grifter's free to continue grifting, will raise money from his accolytes and invest in new ways to fleece even more people.
Mazars said it concluded that the statements were no longer reliable based in part on the attorney general’s earlier filings, its own investigations and information the accountants received from “internal and external sources.” The letter added that Mazars “performed its work in accordance with professional standards.”
While the statements may contain exaggerated estimates of Mr. Trump’s property values, those same documents also include a number of disclaimers, including acknowledgments that Mr. Trump’s accountants had neither audited nor authenticated his claims.
Another disclaimer notes that Mazars did “not express an opinion or provide any assurance about” the statements, a common caveat in statements of financial condition. The firm also disclosed that, while compiling the information for Mr. Trump, it had “become aware of departures from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.”
the problem, for me, is here:
civil, not criminalBecause Ms. James’s investigation is civil, she cannot file criminal charges. But she could sue Mr. Trump and his company to seek financial penalties, and could try to shut down certain aspects of Mr. Trump’s business in New York.
do other people committing this kind of extensive fraud get away with just fines? is it something the DOJ can take up if they've a stomach for it? closing down some of his enterprises will hurt but the grifter's free to continue grifting, will raise money from his accolytes and invest in new ways to fleece even more people.