Trump has finally met his match as he fights 3 unwinnable wars

Politruk

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
17,717
Robert Reich:

They’ve dared China, Harvard, and the Supreme Court to blink.

But guess what? They’ve met their matches. None of them has blinked — and they won’t.

China not only refused to back down when the Trump regime threatened it with huge tariffs. It retaliated with huge tariffs of its own, plus a freeze on the export of rare-earth elements that America’s high-tech and defense industries depend on.

Harvard also pointedly defied the regime, issuing a clear rebuke to the regime’s attempt to interfere with academic freedom. The regime is trying to strike back — at Harvard’s grants, and its tax-exempt status — but the federal courts will surely reject these efforts.

The Supreme Court told the regime in no uncertain terms — in a rare unanimous decision — that its abduction of a legal American resident and deportation to a dangerous prison in El Salvador, without any criminal charges, was illegal and unconstitutional.




Trump is smarter than this. He knows China, Harvard, and the Supreme Court will not back down. All are rich and powerful enough to defy Trump’s escalating threats and demands. They cannot and will not cower.

If Trump escalates his wars against them, they’ll become even stronger in the eyes of their supporters and constituents, and much of the world.

The American people and the world will see that Trump is actually a blowhard with no real power at all.

So if he’s smart, Trump will try to deescalate these three conflicts.

He’s already hinted at an off-ramp with China. He will probably find some way to claim that Harvard has capitulated to his demands. He will avoid a showdown with the Supreme Court.
 
he's also losing some ground over trying to eradicate law firms he doesn't like, despite others capitulating and awarding the whitehouse thousands of hours of pro-bono work

'Let’s kill the lawyers I don’t like': Judge forcefully rejects Trump's executive order targeting Perkins Coie as 'null and void' — issues permanent injunction in swift end to case

“No American President has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue in this lawsuit targeting a prominent law firm with adverse actions to be executed by all Executive branch agencies but, in purpose and effect, this action draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: ‘The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers,'” Howell writes. “Eliminating lawyers as the guardians of the rule of law removes a major impediment to the path to more power.”

While viewing the 45th and 47th president’s attacks on Perkins Coie as part of a “broader campaign” against disfavored law firms, the court slightly updates the Shakespearean verse to accommodate the present moment.

“In a cringe-worthy twist on the theatrical phrase ‘Let’s kill all the lawyers,’ EO 14230 takes the approach of ‘Let’s kill the lawyers I don’t like,’ sending the clear message: lawyers must stick to the party line, or else,” Howell adds.

:nana:
 
he's also losing some ground over trying to eradicate law firms he doesn't like, despite others capitulating and awarding the whitehouse thousands of hours of pro-bono work

'Let’s kill the lawyers I don’t like': Judge forcefully rejects Trump's executive order targeting Perkins Coie as 'null and void' — issues permanent injunction in swift end to case





:nana:
Trump has chosen to do the one thing that will align the entire legal profession against him, judges included. Not even Federalist Society lawyers could stomach this.
 
Robert Reich:

They’ve dared China, Harvard, and the Supreme Court to blink.

But guess what? They’ve met their matches. None of them has blinked — and they won’t.

China not only refused to back down when the Trump regime threatened it with huge tariffs. It retaliated with huge tariffs of its own, plus a freeze on the export of rare-earth elements that America’s high-tech and defense industries depend on.

Harvard also pointedly defied the regime, issuing a clear rebuke to the regime’s attempt to interfere with academic freedom. The regime is trying to strike back — at Harvard’s grants, and its tax-exempt status — but the federal courts will surely reject these efforts.

The Supreme Court told the regime in no uncertain terms — in a rare unanimous decision — that its abduction of a legal American resident and deportation to a dangerous prison in El Salvador, without any criminal charges, was illegal and unconstitutional.




Trump is smarter than this. He knows China, Harvard, and the Supreme Court will not back down. All are rich and powerful enough to defy Trump’s escalating threats and demands. They cannot and will not cower.

If Trump escalates his wars against them, they’ll become even stronger in the eyes of their supporters and constituents, and much of the world.

The American people and the world will see that Trump is actually a blowhard with no real power at all.

So if he’s smart, Trump will try to deescalate these three conflicts.

He’s already hinted at an off-ramp with China. He will probably find some way to claim that Harvard has capitulated to his demands. He will avoid a showdown with the Supreme Court.
Quoted for posterity.
 
he's also losing some ground over trying to eradicate law firms he doesn't like, despite others capitulating and awarding the whitehouse thousands of hours of pro-bono work

'Let’s kill the lawyers I don’t like': Judge forcefully rejects Trump's executive order targeting Perkins Coie as 'null and void' — issues permanent injunction in swift end to case


:nana:
This is a significant setback to forcing everyday Murican citizens to "bend the knee".

Trump had extracted tens of thousands of pro bono legal work from silk stocking law firms for the purported "crime" of representing his political opponents. Trump needed these freebie legal hours. Why?

Because a subsequent Royal Decree (known informally as an "Executive Order") directed state and local police forces to disregard state, local and federal laws in the pursuit of removing "violent criminals" from our streets. Trump defines "violent criminals" as opponents who disagree with him or his policies usually non-white people. He essentially promised overzealous law enforcement the very best legal representation from these firms at no cost to the police OR the federal government.

"Win-win" right? The only person who loses is the alleged evildoer.

Now he's back to square one and has to strongarm Congress into paying for his demand for extrajudicial "street justce".
 
He'll never beat Harvard. He'll never beat the SCOTUS. And China is not about to back down.
 
This is a significant setback to forcing everyday Murican citizens to "bend the knee".

Trump had extracted tens of thousands of pro bono legal work from silk stocking law firms for the purported "crime" of representing his political opponents. Trump needed these freebie legal hours. Why?

Because a subsequent Royal Decree (known informally as an "Executive Order") directed state and local police forces to disregard state, local and federal laws in the pursuit of removing "violent criminals" from our streets. Trump defines "violent criminals" as opponents who disagree with him or his policies usually non-white people. He essentially promised overzealous law enforcement the very best legal representation from these firms at no cost to the police OR the federal government.

"Win-win" right? The only person who loses is the alleged evildoer.

Now he's back to square one and has to strongarm Congress into paying for his demand for extrajudicial "street justice".
don't know how many hours that works out as, but it's almost $1BILLION of free work

America's most prestigious law firms have agreed to provide almost $1 billion worth of legal work to President Trump — and that total will likely grow.
  • Trump announced deals with 5 firms Friday. He's now gotten the giants of Big Law to pledge a combined $940 million in pro bono legal work for conservative causes.
https://www.axios.com/2025/04/12/big-law-pro-bono-legal-work-trump
 
Back
Top