Trump administration forbids CDC officials from using 7 words and phrases

TalkRadio

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Posts
1,307
Trump administration officials are forbidding officials at the nation's top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases - including "fetus" and "transgender" - in any official documents being prepared for next year's budget.

Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are: "vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based" and "science-based."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-cdc-forbidden-words-20171215-story.html
 
Seems like a world like "vulnerable" would come up quite often in documents about, you know, controlling diseases and stuff.
 
Citation, Bertie?

It’s true that President Obama signed H.R. 4238 into law on 20 May 2016, which replaced outdated and inflammatory terms (such as “negro” and “oriental”, among others) with more modernized language commonly used to describe minorities in specified statutes. The legislation did not ban or make use of those terms illegal in public, nor did it outlaw the United Negro College Fund or Martin Luther King’s speeches.


-snopes
 
Who cares about science? It's only about what one believes.

I'm sure the same people who don't believe in science-based evidence don't get vaccines, right?
 
obama banned:

“negro” and “oriental”

but that's ok.

The legislation did not ban or make use of those terms illegal in public, nor did it outlaw the United Negro College Fund or Martin Luther King’s speeches.
In other words, you lied up front. No ban. Sad. But at least you admitted it. Say three Hail Marys.

science doesn't always
get it right:

thalidomide.
Science works to correct itself. Religion doesn't. Cf Australian priests.
 
In other words, you lied up front. No ban. Sad. But at least you admitted it. Say three Hail Marys.

Science works to correct itself. Religion doesn't. Cf Australian priests.

i believe the discussion
is in regards to
government documents.

you do see the distinction?
 
In other words, you lied up front. No ban. Sad. But at least you admitted it. Say three Hail Marys.

Science works to correct itself. Religion doesn't. Cf Australian priests.

sure.
once the damage
is done.

both believe
they are working
in the best interests
of civilization. no?
 
What I see is goverment over-reach, yes. Sound familiar? Trumpy state is frightened by words. Sad
 
i entirely agree.
it's a
governmental issue,
not dependent on
any particular
party.
Dums didn't ban these words. Gups did. Dums didn't ban ethnicity terms. Gups spew ethnic insults. It IS sort of a partisan thing.
 
Dums didn't ban these words. Gups did. Dums didn't ban ethnicity terms. Gups spew ethnic insults. It IS sort of a partisan thing.

governmental intrusions
affect everyone
regardless of
affiliation.

the manipulation
of words is
only an example of
one of the
milder forms.
 
Back
Top