Transgendereism

Ishmael

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Posts
84,005
Might as well open with a bomb, it's a mental disorder, NOT a state of being.

Our esteemed Attorney General has claimed it to be the new front in the fight for civil rights. Horse shit. It's a political agenda with NO basis in civil rights whatsoever. Nothing more than a centralized power grab by the federal government.

We have .25% of the population driving an agenda for the balance. If it were nothing more than just understanding the disorder I suppose we could live with that. But to force upon the public an agenda that encompasses architectural changes to accommodate the mentally impaired is a step too far.

If one can choose facilities and demand accommodation merely because of what they believe themselves to be rather than what they are, then I can choose to be an Amerindian with all of the perks thereof, and you can be black, or Asian, or even physically impaired. Who's to argue otherwise if that's what you believe?

As a solution to this non-problem that has caught the fancy of those into pop-crisis I offer this;

1. Give them free treatment for their mental disorder.
2. Give them free surgical remedy.
3. If they refuse the first two options, encourage suicide. (They already have an extraordinary high rate anyway. And if that isn't a sign of mental disorder I don't know what is.)
4. Euthanize them.

Society doesn't have to put up with their shit, or the governments insistence that we do.

Ismael
 
Might as well open with a bomb, it's a mental disorder, NOT a state of being.

Our esteemed Attorney General has claimed it to be the new front in the fight for civil rights. Horse shit. It's a political agenda with NO basis in civil rights whatsoever. Nothing more than a centralized power grab by the federal government.

We have .25% of the population driving an agenda for the balance. If it were nothing more than just understanding the disorder I suppose we could live with that. But to force upon the public an agenda that encompasses architectural changes to accommodate the mentally impaired is a step too far.

If one can choose facilities and demand accommodation merely because of what they believe themselves to be rather than what they are, then I can choose to be an Amerindian with all of the perks thereof, and you can be black, or Asian, or even physically impaired. Who's to argue otherwise if that's what you believe?

As a solution to this non-problem that has caught the fancy of those into pop-crisis I offer this;

1. Give them free treatment for their mental disorder.
2. Give them free surgical remedy.
3. If they refuse the first two options, encourage suicide. (They already have an extraordinary high rate anyway. And if that isn't a sign of mental disorder I don't know what is.)
4. Euthanize them.

Society doesn't have to put up with their shit, or the governments insistence that we do.

Ismael

Have anything at all to back up your claim that it's a mental disorder?
 
Ishmaeleism

Might as well open with a bomb, it's a mental disorder, NOT a state of being.

Our esteemed Attorney General has claimed it to be the new front in the fight for civil rights. Horse shit. It's a political agenda with NO basis in civil rights whatsoever. Nothing more than a centralized power grab by the federal government.

We have 0.005% of the population driving an agenda for the balance. If it were nothing more than just understanding the disorder I suppose we could live with that. But to force upon the public an agenda that encompasses architectural changes to accommodate the mentally impaired is a step too far.

If one can choose facilities and demand accommodation merely because of what they believe themselves to be rather than what they are, then I can choose to be an Amerindian with all of the perks thereof, and you can be black, or Asian, or even physically impaired. Who's to argue otherwise if that's what you believe?

As a solution to this non-problem that has caught the fancy of those into pop-crisis I offer this;

1. Give them free treatment for their mental disorder.
2. Give them free surgical remedy.
3. If they refuse the first two options, encourage suicide. (They already have an extraordinary high rate anyway. And if that isn't a sign of mental disorder I don't know what is.)
4. Euthanize them.

Society doesn't have to put up with their shit, or the governments insistence that we do.

Sticks
 
So you bitch at me for what you call "censoring free speech" and then go on a rant about murdering people that you claim have a mental disorder?

Sounds like someone's been reading Mein Kampf.
 
You are spending a lot of energy worrying about other people's genitals...

Do you support euthanasia for your boy Busybody?

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Might as well open with a bomb, it's a mental disorder, NOT a state of being.

Our esteemed Attorney General has claimed it to be the new front in the fight for civil rights. Horse shit. It's a political agenda with NO basis in civil rights whatsoever. Nothing more than a centralized power grab by the federal government.

We have .25% of the population driving an agenda for the balance. If it were nothing more than just understanding the disorder I suppose we could live with that. But to force upon the public an agenda that encompasses architectural changes to accommodate the mentally impaired is a step too far.

If one can choose facilities and demand accommodation merely because of what they believe themselves to be rather than what they are, then I can choose to be an Amerindian with all of the perks thereof, and you can be black, or Asian, or even physically impaired. Who's to argue otherwise if that's what you believe?

As a solution to this non-problem that has caught the fancy of those into pop-crisis I offer this;

1. Give them free treatment for their mental disorder.
2. Give them free surgical remedy.
3. If they refuse the first two options, encourage suicide. (They already have an extraordinary high rate anyway. And if that isn't a sign of mental disorder I don't know what is.)
4. Euthanize them.

Society doesn't have to put up with their shit, or the governments insistence that we do.

Ismael

Is this what we're calling your drunken farts now?
 
So you bitch at me for what you call "censoring free speech" and then go on a rant about murdering people that you claim have a mental disorder?

Sounds like someone's been reading Mein Kampf.

Mein Kampf is pretty boring.

Transsexuals are ego dystonic for life inside their own skins, and the roles assigned to their sex. Most of us are born with the aptitude to act violent and self destructive and criminal, yet little of it is celebrated by society. Yet every fag I know celebrates ego dystonic behavior like it was a lost commandment handed to Moses.
 
kind of reminds me of american horror story: asylum; the people running the joint were way wayyyy scarier than the so-called mentally ill inmates. mental illness, just another name for sin, ammirite? or an excuse for science to do some terrible things. and for those labeled as sinful/mentally ill - the homosexual, just for instance - who are sane? jeez

thank fuck times move on, science learns, and the old ways die out
 
Mein Kampf is pretty boring.

Transsexuals are ego dystonic for life inside their own skins, and the roles assigned to their sex. Most of us are born with the aptitude to act violent and self destructive and criminal, yet little of it is celebrated by society. Yet every fag I know celebrates ego dystonic behavior like it was a lost commandment handed to Moses.

How many gay people do you know?

And do you fuck all of them?
 
We always laugh at actors who go tranny ....is it because they are homos or because they are women?
 
I think transgeneritis was normalized on the gb by butters and harry...were they our first openly trans couple?
 
Might as well open with a bomb, it's a mental disorder, NOT a state of being.

Our esteemed Attorney General has claimed it to be the new front in the fight for civil rights. Horse shit. It's a political agenda with NO basis in civil rights whatsoever. Nothing more than a centralized power grab by the federal government.

We have .25% of the population driving an agenda for the balance. If it were nothing more than just understanding the disorder I suppose we could live with that. But to force upon the public an agenda that encompasses architectural changes to accommodate the mentally impaired is a step too far.

If one can choose facilities and demand accommodation merely because of what they believe themselves to be rather than what they are, then I can choose to be an Amerindian with all of the perks thereof, and you can be black, or Asian, or even physically impaired. Who's to argue otherwise if that's what you believe?

As a solution to this non-problem that has caught the fancy of those into pop-crisis I offer this;

1. Give them free treatment for their mental disorder.
2. Give them free surgical remedy.
3. If they refuse the first two options, encourage suicide. (They already have an extraordinary high rate anyway. And if that isn't a sign of mental disorder I don't know what is.)
4. Euthanize them.

Society doesn't have to put up with their shit, or the governments insistence that we do.

Ismael

We already did a variation on this thread. It seems that the most would chuck Science out the window and go with the emotional well-being of the mentally ill to play at whatever they think they are at the moment.
 
Just because apa decided to include it in the dsm -for now- doesn't put it on the same level with the 'mental disorders'.
They did it mainly to secure funding and appropriate monitoring for all the interventions needed, and in order for the issue to be taken seriously.

Otherwise, the real crazies like Bruce Jenner will soon decide to play "let me change dresses", only to change their minds afterwards.
What a circus and a trainwreck, that one was… .
 
Last edited:
Says the bro trying to pass as a woman so he can cyber all da right wing bros

lololol

Afraid comin out dat closet will scare away your friends eh Query?

*chuckle*

Do shove a corncob up your ass, Disgustipated or RacistDownSouth.
 
Trumpstoupee is a good name, but i think you should have gone with trumpsbeard.
 
Interesting….It just occurred to me:

In the case of probably all mental disorders, the treatment also means trying to correct that 'disorder' and bring the individual back to the societal standards, so to speak.

For transgender individuals (or whatever they decided to call them nowadays) - it's completely the opposite.
 
Back
Top