Torture~Powell is confused, Jags are wrong,Graham, Warner & McCain don't understand

~hellbaby~

It's not a demon thing
Joined
Nov 20, 2004
Posts
5,510
Torture~Powell is confused, Jags are wrong,Graham, Warner & McCain don't understand

The Supreme court,Generals, the charman of Armed Service Committee, military lawyers, a bunch of republican senators and of course the dems all agree Bush cannot rewrite the Geneva Conventon, but they just do not know anything about how to be a wannabe dictator.


A rebellious Senate committee defied President Bush on Thursday and approved terror-detainee legislation he has vowed to block, deepening Republican conflict over terrorism and national security in the middle of the election season.

Republican Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record) of Virginia, normally a Bush supporter, pushed the measure through his Armed Services Committee by a 15-9 vote, with Warner and three other GOP lawmakers joining Democrats. The vote set the stage for a showdown on the Senate floor as early as next week.

In an embarrassment to the White House, Colin Powell — Bush's first secretary of state — announced his opposition to his old boss' plan, saying it would hurt the country. Powell's successor, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, jumped to the president's defense in a letter of her own.

All this played out after Bush started his day by journeying to the Capitol to try nailing down support for his own version of the legislation — and by issuing a threat to the maverick Republicans.

"I will resist any bill that does not enable this program to go forward with legal clarity," Bush said at the White House.

The president's measure would go further than the Senate package in allowing classified evidence to be withheld from defendants in terror trials, using coerced testimony and protecting CIA and other U.S. interrogators against prosecution for using methods that may violate the Geneva Conventions.

"The world is beginning to doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism," Powell, a retired general who is also a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote in his letter.

Powell said Bush's bill, by redefining the kind of treatment the Geneva Conventions allow, "would add to those doubts. Furthermore, it would put our own troops at risk."

Firing back, White House spokesman Tony Snow said Powell was "confused" about the White House plan. Later, Snow said he probably shouldn't have used that word.

"I know that Colin Powell wants to beat the terrorists, too," he said.

The administration also produced its own letter from Rice. She wrote that narrowing the standards for detainee treatment as Bush has proposed "would add meaningful definition and clarification to vague terms in the treaties."

In addition, CIA Director Michael Hayden wrote a letter to his employees saying he has asked Congress "to help define our responsibilities so that we and the Department of Justice can judge the appropriateness of any procedures we would propose to use" while questioning terrorism suspects. He said Bush's bill did that.

In the committee vote, Warner was supported by GOP Sens. McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine. Warner, McCain and Graham had been the most active senators opposing Bush's plan. The vote by the moderate Collins underscored that there might be broad enough GOP support to successfully take on Bush on the floor of the Republican-run Senate.

As the battle mushrooms, it threatens to undermine campaign season assertions by the administration that it has shown a steady hand on security matters and that Republicans should be trusted over Democrats on such issues.

Bush still has many congressional allies, including House and Senate leaders and conservatives, who want to align themselves with the president's tough stance on interrogation and prosecution. The House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday passed a bill that supports the administration's position by 52-8.

But that support is not universal. Rep. Steve Buyer (news, bio, voting record), R-Ind., said he told Bush during the president's visit that he should heed the military's top uniformed lawyers, who have previously opposed some provisions of the president's plan.

Buyer and other Republicans are expected to align themselves with McCain, who spent more than five years as a prisoner of war during Vietnam. Last year, he overcame Bush's objections to pass legislation banning cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of detainees.

Leaving his closed-door meeting with the House GOP caucus, Bush said he would "continue to work with members of the Congress to get good legislation." He complimented a House bill but did not mention the Senate version.

"I reminded them that the most important job of government is to protect the homeland," he said. Bush was accompanied by Vice President Dick Cheney and White House political adviser Karl Rove.

The White House also released a letter to lawmakers signed by the military's top uniformed lawyers. Saying they wanted to clarify past testimony on Capitol Hill in which they opposed the administration's plan, the lawyers wrote that they "do not object" to sections of Bush's proposal for the treatment of detainees.

Two congressional aides who favor McCain's plan said the military lawyers signed that letter after refusing to endorse an earlier one offered by the Pentagon's general counsel, William Haynes, that expressed more forceful support for Bush's plan.

The aides spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. Asked if Haynes had encouraged them to write the letter, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said, "Not that I'm aware of."

Another Bush bill would give legal status to the administration's warrantless wiretapping program. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill on a party-line vote Wednesday, but it is stalled in the House amid opposition from Democrats and some Republicans concerned that the program violates civil liberties.

__

 
~hellbaby~ said:
The Supreme court,Generals, the charman of Armed Service Committee, military lawyers, a bunch of republican senators and of course the dems all agree Bush cannot rewrite the Geneva Conventon, but they just do not know anything about how to be a wannabe dictator.
Okay, Hellbaby..... what's the bottom line here?

Tell me you're opposed to the NSA wiretaps.

Tell me the prisoners have been subjected to heinous torture....crimes against humanity.


Edited to add..... Can you slow down the GIF in your sig, so I can get a look at the snatch?.... :)
 
Last edited:
garbage can said:
Okay, Hellbaby..... what's the bottom line here?

Tell me you're opposed to the NSA wiretaps.

Tell me the prisoners have been subjected to heinous torture....crimes against humanity.


Edited to add..... Can you slow down the GIF in your sig, so I can get a look at the snatch?.... :)
You tell me what the bottom line is... now he wants evidence to be optional, that cool with you? Why can't you see what s happenning here?
See, you gotta look a little quicker, or you miss the real deal! :)http://pics.livejournal.com/fuzzyduckfuzz/pic/000q49bw
 
Last edited:
~hellbaby~ said:
You tell me what the bottom line is... now he wants evidence to be optional, that cool with you? Why can't you see what s happenning here?
*Grin*..... Ok Hellbaby, I'll bite... Tell me about all the rights you've lost... :)
 
garbage can said:
*Grin*..... Ok Hellbaby, I'll bite... Tell me about all the rights you've lost... :)
OK, how about the right to pick my nose at a trafficc light and not have my picture taken. How about the right to take ten thousand dollars out of my bank account and send it to my sick Syrian grandma (if I had one), and not be put through the ringer as a suspected terrorist. For that matter, maybe I just want to spend ten grand on bubble gum? I can't, not without my bank alerting DHS because anyone who wants ten grand of bazooka must be involved with terrorism, domestic terrorism or narco terrorism and is subjected to investigation because during TWOT you cannot chew gum.
The danger here is not so much about me and my individual rights as it is the combination of the factors as a whole. First of off, this man is breaking the law, the SCOTUS has said so. There is no respect for the very foundation of this country. The US was formed by people who wanted to escape tyranny, it is the basis of this country. The founding fathers warned over and over the importance of not letting power run amuck. The implications of allowing the leader of this country to get away with breaking the law are dire. Why stop here. At what point does preserving freedom render us imprisoned? When is enough enough?
So people argue, well if I’m not doing anything bad, what is the big deal? How far do you let it go? Is it ok if next week you need to get implanted with a chip in your arm?
It is not so much what you do. Is it necessary to have every move you make logged. Every time you get in your car, everything you buy, eat every call you make; it is all collected. It seems to make freedom feel not so free. The government has so much data, they cannot even process it or figure out what needs to be processed. The premise it is for the safety of the country from terrorists is crap.
There will never be an end to the war on terror, Christ, no one won the war on Christmas, how do you expect them to win a war on terror. You simply cannot go around killing everyone and expect it to stop terrorism, it just is not possible. If it were there would be no murders, rape or robbery either.
But because everyone bought into this, we now publicly condone secret prisons, torture, wiretapping and rendition. The US is fast becoming a place that has allowed itself to be governed by the most hated and disrespected person of the 21st century.
I guess the most important right people here are losing is self respect and the right to feel proud of the direction the person they elected to lead them is taking the country.
Do you know how many 'terrorists' the US has sent to prison for a term longer than 5 years since 911? Eight.... And of the eight, some where in jail pre911 waiting trial.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top