Topless in New York

Liar

now with 17% more class
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
43,715
Apparently, it's perfectly fine to let 'em bounce free in the Big Apple. All in the name of equality. Never saw anyone excersize that right though when I was there. Just my luck to visit in chilly November. :rolleyes:

-------------------------------

'BUST'ED GAL PAYOFF AFFIRMS LEGAL RIGHT TO GO TOPLESS IN CITY
By KATHIANNE BONIELLO

June 17, 2007 -- Who knew it was legal for a woman to walk around with her breasts exposed in New York?

Well, one woman did - and a cop didn't - and now she has forced the city to fork over a $29,000 legal set tlement for ille gally busting her when she law fully bared her bosom and went for a stroll two years ago.

Jill Coccaro, a 27-year-old East Village artist who now goes by the name Phoenix Feeley, went au na turel on Aug. 4, 2005, when she pulled down the front of her painter's jumpsuit during an art-show promotion to cool off.

In 1992 a state appeals court ruled that if men could expose their chests in public women could not be punished for doing the same.

In 2003, high-profile law yer Ron Kuby had used the law change to win a $10,000 settlement from the city for a model who'd been busted wearing a thong and body paint to the Coney Island Mer maid Parade.

But that didn't stop a cop, who spotted Fee ley at about 1:30 a.m. strolling topless on Delancey Street, telling her to cover up.

When Feeley refused - informing the officer she had a legal right to be naked to the waist, just like a man - the officer took her into custody for indecent exposure.

"I did not do anything to anyone on that street, I did not harm anyone," she recalled. "I was so not resisting arrest."

But Feeley spent 12 hours in custody before the officer told her the District Attorney's Office had declined to press charges.

While she was detained, Feeley claims, an officer yanked her from a patrol car by her hair, that she was taken to Bellevue Hospital for a psychiatric evaluation and that cops refused to help her repair her by-then badly ripped jumpsuit. "I was asking not to walk around in my underwear and they were not helping me with that," she said. "By the end of the night I walked out with my shirt off and my pants on."


"The thing the cop did not seem to understand, and what's so problematic, was that it was Phoenix who would decide what parts of her body would be exposed," said her attorney, Jeffrey Rothman.

The arrest came a day before her young daughter's birthday and caused Feeley to miss a Family Court appearance involving her ex-husband.

Feeley said she's gone bare-breasted before - after running the 2004 New York City marathon - without cops bothering her.

"I've always just felt that was something natural," Feeley said of baring her breasts. "I've kind of always done it out of practicality."

She sued the city and the arresting officers last October. The city agreed to settle, without admitting any fault, on June 4.

"I felt like I deserved it," Feeley said.
 
The ruling was made about ten years ago. I knew about it. And yet, still, only the occasional woman takes advantage of the freedom.
 
I suppose it is asking too much for the fuzz to know the law they are supposedly trying to enforce.
 
R. Richard said:
I suppose it is asking too much for the fuzz to know the law they are supposedly trying to enforce.
Oh come now. Laws are complicated thingamajigs. Not even lawyers seems to understand them properly.
 
lmao ...the hubby says we're going through new york on our holiday. Said we'll make a stop and he'll let me run down the street topless to make some extra money off the police.;) *Geesh* Crazy man. :rolleyes:
 
TheeGoatPig said:
The ruling was made about ten years ago. I knew about it. And yet, still, only the occasional woman takes advantage of the freedom.
Societal pressures.
 
I DEMAND equality. I want guys walking the streets of New York with their schlongs hanging out!!! Equal Rights NOW!!!
 
You know -- I was just wondering the other day what had happened to that law. This saves me the trouble of looking it up. It's nice to know it's still in effect -- a pity more ladies aren't taking advantage of it -- although, for a while, there were ones that shouldn't have been -- if you know what I mean. Some things are better left to the imagination.

The only time I ever saw someone officially topless (at an official NY beach) was at Lake Awosting, which is this really isolated lake in Minnewaska State Park (it's a few miles back from Lake Minnewaska) -- the funny thing is I had hiked back there nude, just wrapping a towel around me when we encountered other hikers, and we had already been skinny dipping on another section of the beach before we got down to the official one. So it wasn't much of a thrill -- particularly since these two were in the "better left to the imagination" category.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Nudity is so unsexy.

Depends who is nude. But that's just me. I wouldn't find a heavyset, hairy man my age naked to be all that sexy, but Natalie Portman, for instance, or even, better Connie Nielsen....nice. :devil:
 
Jenny_Jackson said:
I DEMAND equality. I want guys walking the streets of New York with their schlongs hanging out!!! Equal Rights NOW!!!
Only if girls you parade around with their twats on display. Same fing. :cool:
dr_mabeuse said:
Nudity is so unsexy.
It's not the birthday suit, it's how you wear it.
 
Liar said:
Only if girls you parade around with their twats on display. Same fing. :cool:
I have no problem with that, Liar. Clothes are not really necessary except in inclimate weather anyway ;)
 
WRJames said:
You know -- I was just wondering the other day what had happened to that law. This saves me the trouble of looking it up. It's nice to know it's still in effect -- a pity more ladies aren't taking advantage of it -- although, for a while, there were ones that shouldn't have been -- if you know what I mean. Some things are better left to the imagination.

The only time I ever saw someone officially topless (at an official NY beach) was at Lake Awosting, which is this really isolated lake in Minnewaska State Park (it's a few miles back from Lake Minnewaska) -- the funny thing is I had hiked back there nude, just wrapping a towel around me when we encountered other hikers, and we had already been skinny dipping on another section of the beach before we got down to the official one. So it wasn't much of a thrill -- particularly since these two were in the "better left to the imagination" category.
The intent is personal comfort, lovie-- not your titilation.

In fact, the titillation factor is why it's usually illegal. Remember? :rolleyes:
 
Stella_Omega said:
Societal pressures.

WRJames said:
You know -- I was just wondering the other day what had happened to that law. This saves me the trouble of looking it up. It's nice to know it's still in effect -- a pity more ladies aren't taking advantage of it -- although, for a while, there were ones that shouldn't have been -- if you know what I mean. Some things are better left to the imagination.

The only time I ever saw someone officially topless (at an official NY beach) was at Lake Awosting, which is this really isolated lake in Minnewaska State Park (it's a few miles back from Lake Minnewaska) -- the funny thing is I had hiked back there nude, just wrapping a towel around me when we encountered other hikers, and we had already been skinny dipping on another section of the beach before we got down to the official one. So it wasn't much of a thrill -- particularly since these two were in the "better left to the imagination" category.

Hm, interesting.

Actually, back when I was in college (in Jersey), a friend of mine tried to convince me to go topless with her the next time we went to spend a day in the city. (She actually wanted to write a paper about it for one of her sociology classes. The reason I didn't do it was that I was afraid people would feel like WRJames and let me know it. Guess that goes to support Sella's (quoted) point.
 
WRJames said:
Being nude -- or seeing other people nude?

Both for me. The Nude Day Contest is the only contest that totally leaves me cold.

It's all the effort that goes into looking not nude that does it, I think.
 
CeriseNoire said:
Hm, interesting.

Actually, back when I was in college (in Jersey), a friend of mine tried to convince me to go topless with her the next time we went to spend a day in the city. (She actually wanted to write a paper about it for one of her sociology classes. The reason I didn't do it was that I was afraid people would feel like WRJames and let me know it. Guess that goes to support Sella's (quoted) point.
Yep, I wouldn't pass WRJames's inspection either.

Tough, as they say, titties. :D

I was actually thinking about women with beautiful boobs and the kind of attention they'd have to endure...
 
I agree with this. And so would any man who's viewed a strip-tease show time-reversed.
 
Stella_Omega said:
Yep, I wouldn't pass WRJames's inspection either.

Tough, as they say, titties. :D

I was actually thinking about women with beautiful boobs and the kind of attention they'd have to endure...

This is lost on me, but I've never been a breast-man. Maybe it's because I wasn't breast-fed. Wouldn't surprise me.
 
Sub Joe said:
I agree with this. And so would any man who's viewed a strip-tease show time-reversed.
I've seen a reverse strip tease... It works (if the audience is intoxicated enough, IMO, and we were)
 
Stella_Omega said:
Yep, I wouldn't pass WRJames's inspection either.

Tough, as they say, titties. :D

I was actually thinking about women with beautiful boobs and the kind of attention they'd have to endure...

Hey, my titties are very soft! :eek: Oh wait, you didn't mean that literally.

Now that you mention it though, those who liked them probably would have been just as bothersome as those who didn't.
 
FazilKotuk said:
This is lost on me, but I've never been a breast-man. Maybe it's because I wasn't breast-fed. Wouldn't surprise me.
Hey...watch thee generalizations, now...I'm an unabashed breast-man and I wasn't breast fed, either!

I remember when this law was put into effect. Surprised that some people think this is a new and surprising thing, especially in the wake of all that celebrity bimbo no-panty coochie flashing that wasn't about jackshit. And I totally support it. I don't care if you look like Giselle Bundchen or Margaret Thatcher. If you're sweltering and you don't wanna wear your top like the men don't have to so they can be (negligibly) cooler, then go for it.
 
CeriseNoire said:
Hey, my titties are very soft! :eek: Oh wait, you didn't mean that literally.

Now that you mention it though, those who liked them probably would have been just as bothersome as those who didn't.
More so, in New York. And all points West, I'd bet. Pregnant women and naked titties are, somehow, public property -- for entirely different reasons of course.
 
Back
Top