tod!!!

SEXXYNESS said:
your pic looks like my dad

Ok, at the VERY least, since names are RIGHT there next to all those cute lil pics you like, could you try to go out of your way to spell our nick's right?
 
Re: Re: tod!!!

Gilly Bean said:


Ok, at the VERY least, since names are RIGHT there next to all those cute lil pics you like, could you try to go out of your way to spell our nick's right?


based on it's spelling ability, i dont think it's gone beyond the third grade on the lines of spelling (or any other grammatical related issues). it's really sad that this freak cant read besides that.
 
I have been trying to be good all day, too, Willing, but she brings ignorant to a whole new level, and it's getting harder and harder to ignore such stupidity. (Such as suggesting porn for a kids birthday party)
 
Gilly Bean said:
I have been trying to be good all day, too, Willing, but she brings ignorant to a whole new level, and it's getting harder and harder to ignore such stupidity. (Such as suggesting porn for a kids birthday party)

i saw that suggestion.. maybe we should let Laurel know of that one.. that's just wrong, morally and legally.. and i dont think should be condoned by anyone (which it hasnt so far.. except the freak that suggested it).. and besides, there's no telling what else may appear later from this one if it's suggesting porn for children

and the stupidity thing, i think that's going to get worse. the thing cant even type out little words (i.e. 2, u, etc). and it isnt just that, but the misspelling of names is beyond terrible if you ask me, especially if they have the name available to look at
 
Re: Re: Re: tod!!!

Willing and Unsure said:



based on it's spelling ability, i dont think it's gone beyond the third grade on the lines of spelling (or any other grammatical related issues). it's really sad that this freak cant read besides that.

can't is can't.....and I'm being rather nice about this ;) why don't we just toss all those that can't spell or be gramatically correct?
That'll empty about half the tank:eek:
 
Willing and Unsure said:


i saw that suggestion.. maybe we should let Laurel know of that one.. that's just wrong, morally and legally.. and i dont think should be condoned by anyone (which it hasnt so far.. except the freak that suggested it).. and besides, there's no telling what else may appear later from this one if it's suggesting porn for children

and the stupidity thing, i think that's going to get worse. the thing cant even type out little words (i.e. 2, u, etc). and it isnt just that, but the misspelling of names is beyond terrible if you ask me, especially if they have the name available to look at


I agree 100%

Laurel, please, please... help....
 
what did i do

plese dont b angery with me becuse im not a bad person i just dont spel good and i just want 2 get 100 post 4 a pic and then i not post agan 2day.
 
u2slow13 said:


can't is can't.....and I'm being rather nice about this ;) why don't we just toss all those that can't spell or be gramatically correct?
That'll empty about half the tank:eek:


it's one thing to spell things the wrong way, or to be gramatically incorrect, but its another to suggest letting small children look at porn, which is the reason why i said it should be reported to Laurel.

as for being gramatically correct, the only thing that can really ever be picked at in my posts is my choice to not use punctuation correctly or to use capitalization. and i really dont care what anyone has to say about that since they are my posts, my thoughts, and if someone doesnt like the way i display them, then they can shove it up their ass and blow it out their nose.
 
Back
Top