To the surprise of no one at all................It was all made up and corrupted

[1984X2024]

Obama’s Trump-Russia collusion report was corrupt from start: CIA review​

https://nypost.com/2025/07/02/us-ne...63703029470392ebba&utm_term=NYP - News Alerts

 

[ll74]

Cool.

What about the GOP led Senate Congressional report on Russian interference that agreed with Obama's?

 

[1984X2024]

There was nothing in there that showed that, they just agreed with the narrative. Yes, I did read it all and there is nothing in there and you cant show anything to the contrary

 

[ll74]

There was nothing in there that showed that, they just agreed with the narrative. Yes, I did read it all and there is nothing in there and you cant show anything to the contrary

So was the Congressional report wrong? All five volumes?

What I notice about any criticism about the claim of Russian interference is the reliance on the dossier being the main issue...... When in the Congressional report, it's mentioned as an unreliable source of information yet still they concluded that there was significant interference by Russia.

 

[1984X2024]

AI Overview



The final report from the Senate Intelligence Committee on Russian interference in the 2016 election, while detailing extensive contacts between the Trump campaign and individuals linked to the Russian government and labeling them a "grave counterintelligence threat,"
did not find evidence of a coordinated conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to influence the election. This is a fact that Republicans on the committee emphasized.

Key Findings:

• Extensive Contacts: The report documented "numerous contacts" and a "breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives".
• Counterintelligence Threat: These contacts were deemed a "grave counterintelligence threat".
• No Collusion Finding: The committee explicitly stated that it "found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election".
• Russian Interference: The report did find "irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling" in the election, with Russia engaging in an "aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence," the election.
• Support for Mueller Findings: The committee's conclusions largely supported the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.

In summary, while the Senate report highlighted the significant extent of the Trump campaign's contacts with individuals tied to the Russian government and assessed these as a severe counterintelligence threat, it did not find evidence of a coordinated scheme to collude with Russia to influence the election.

 

[Mrtenant]

AI Overview



The final report from the Senate Intelligence Committee on Russian interference in the 2016 election, while detailing extensive contacts between the Trump campaign and individuals linked to the Russian government and labeling them a "grave counterintelligence threat,"
did not find evidence of a coordinated conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to influence the election. This is a fact that Republicans on the committee emphasized.

Key Findings:

• Extensive Contacts: The report documented "numerous contacts" and a "breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives".
• Counterintelligence Threat: These contacts were deemed a "grave counterintelligence threat".
• No Collusion Finding: The committee explicitly stated that it "found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election".
• Russian Interference: The report did find "irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling" in the election, with Russia engaging in an "aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence," the election.
• Support for Mueller Findings: The committee's conclusions largely supported the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.

In summary, while the Senate report highlighted the significant extent of the Trump campaign's contacts with individuals tied to the Russian government and assessed these as a severe counterintelligence threat, it did not find evidence of a coordinated scheme to collude with Russia to influence the election.

Sounds like a coverup. Where there's smoke there's fire.

If I look on my wife's phone and there are texts to some guy she has said publicly that she likes, and even publicly asks for a dick pic, and then says oh, just kidding. But still, has this adoration presentation for this guy publicly all the time, I mean, hell, its probably nothing. Even if she has been married 3x and cheated on each of her husbands, the last one with a porn star. Has shitty credit history having gone bankrupt 6 fucking times. Always borrows money from the bloke. Known to lie all the fucking time. Its probably nothing. Right?

 

[ll74]

AI Overview



The final report from the Senate Intelligence Committee on Russian interference in the 2016 election, while detailing extensive contacts between the Trump campaign and individuals linked to the Russian government and labeling them a "grave counterintelligence threat,"
did not find evidence of a coordinated conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to influence the election. This is a fact that Republicans on the committee emphasized.

Key Findings:

• Extensive Contacts: The report documented "numerous contacts" and a "breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives".
• Counterintelligence Threat: These contacts were deemed a "grave counterintelligence threat".
• No Collusion Finding: The committee explicitly stated that it "found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election".
• Russian Interference: The report did find "irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling" in the election, with Russia engaging in an "aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence," the election.
• Support for Mueller Findings: The committee's conclusions largely supported the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.

In summary, while the Senate report highlighted the significant extent of the Trump campaign's contacts with individuals tied to the Russian government and assessed these as a severe counterintelligence threat, it did not find evidence of a coordinated scheme to collude with Russia to influence the election.

I wasn't discussing collusion. If I were,.I wouldn't have mentioned the Senate report.

 

[1984X2024]

I wasn't discussing collusion. If I were,.I wouldn't have mentioned the Senate report.

To the surprise of no one at all................It was all made up and corrupted​

 

[ll74]

To the surprise of no one at all................It was all made up and corrupted​

Russian interfered in the 2016 election. That is a fact.

 

[Baztrachian]

Russian interfered in the 2016 election. That is a fact.

Nope. And even left-wing Vox isn't buying that bullshit narrative anymore:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli.../russia-2016-election-trolls-study-email-hack

The Russian trolls were overhyped.

That’s the implication from a new study in Nature Communications, written by a team of six academics who tried to assess whether the Russian government’s Twitter propaganda effort during the 2016 campaign actually changed users’ minds. “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior,” the authors wrote.

 

[ll74]

Nope. And even left-wing Vox isn't buying that bullshit narrative anymore:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli.../russia-2016-election-trolls-study-email-hack

The Russian trolls were overhyped.

That’s the implication from a new study in Nature Communications, written by a team of six academics who tried to assess whether the Russian government’s Twitter propaganda effort during the 2016 campaign actually changed users’ minds. “We find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior,” the authors wrote.

Five volumes of evidence say otherwise. Your study is about whether their influence.was.effective, not whether it existed.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov...united-states-senate-russian-active-measures/

 

[MajorRewrite]

To the surprise of no one at all................It was all made up and corrupted​

To the surprise of no one at all … mentally disabled 86TintaNoitx2024 is gullible as well as dumb.

 

[WinSomeLuzSome]

In my somewhat limited time on this board, I have seen you write this often, I dont see how you can use the word gullible as the link posted was a CIA report? I know you have issues with the poster but choose another word.

 

[WinSomeLuzSome]

To the surprise of no one at all … mentally disabled 86TintaNoitx2024 is gullible as well as dumb.

86TintaNoitx2024, English please, what am I missing?

 

[HisArpy]

86TintaNoitx2024, English please, what am I missing?

That particular Alt is claiming you're an Alt of another member.

The irony is amazing.

 

[MajorRewrite]

86TintaNoitx2024, English please, what am I missing?

86all, Tinta, Noitall and 1984x2024 are all the same person. And he’s had many more usernames too.

He’s a weirdo.

 

[ll74]

1984x2024 is the ancient user, BB who has been banned multiple times a year, since I've been here.