cymbidia
unrepentant pervert
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2001
- Posts
- 8,786
The following has been trying to come to you for days, Sylvia. Lit email not working is a problem. I thought you might want this now, here, instead of suffering like the damned with an always-empty email box. I hope i'm right!
cym
``````````````````
Hello Sylvia,
...and thank you for your feedback on my small effort. Unlike many here who are professional writers, i'm simply a hobbyist and write as a way to process my fantasies and/or experiences. Until very recently, i didn't care one tiny bit about anyone's reactions to what i wrote. However, recently I've come to covet the tools which will make me a clearer, more understandable, writer of these small fictions. One of the tools, of course, involves being open to peer criticism of what i've done so far. ("Peer" is a subjective term as i've used it here; most of my "peers" [you included, of course] are *far* better writers now than i will ever be.)
FYI, my Lit submissions are deliberately short. Since they're not proper stories at all, clearly falling into the category of "character sketches" (as an esteemed Lit editor pointed out to me), there's no natural requirement for length. Additionally, my personal preference from a reader's perspective is toward shorter stories, stories that have multiple chapters if the telling of the story requires that.
I just read your story "The Mountain". You've a very good eye for description and characterization without being flowery and long-winded. Your technical details (spelling, punctuation, etc) are excellent. Your plot was fully developed and interesting. I liked the story very much. It could have been broken into about five or so chapters, but then again, that's my personal preference. I don't know if very long stories like yours get quite the readers that shorter stories get; it may be a problem with the attention span of Lit readers, quite frankly.
Perhaps a repost of your story divided in chapters would boost your reader rates, if you're watching that.
I'll get back to you on your "Sean the Great", too. I *really* like your style in the NC category. Too many stories there are just erotic lovemaking with a mask on, you know? It's-her-loving-hubby-but-she-doesn't-know-that-until-after-the-orgasms kinda stuff. It's refreshing to read well-written stories that are actually, really, about non-consent sexual situations.
Please read my "Pierced" if you have an opportunity. I'd appreciate your feedback on that one. It's got less blood then one might think judging by the title, and the blood it does have is incidental to the story. It's far more about the headspace between an emotionally bonded pair, a submissive masochist and her Dominant, a sadist. It's about what lies between people like that, people who have edgy needs and who've found in each other a perfect complement for the unleashing of those needs.
Thanks again for your feedback. It's valuable stuff.
cym
From: Feedback <feedback@literotica.com>
To: cymbidia <cymbidia@hotmail.com>
Subject: Literotica: Feedback for cymbidia
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 02:32:41 -0400
This message contains feedback for: cymbidia
About the submission: First Meeting
This feedback was sent by: sylviarockon@literotica.org
Comments:
Hi cymbidia, I just read your story First Meeting after joining the discussion circle on the BB
I read the first one on the list. It was well-written if a bit short. I was disappointed it didn\'t go anywhere.
I would\'ve liked to know more about how these characters had met, her they were, how they had built each other
up to the level of anticipation they were experiencing. Maybe some dialogue before they actually meet, could set it up.
You know, maybe they could have a conversation somewhere then the d/s theme would be more of a contrast, you
would feel the shock of the word \"Sir\" along with the characters...
Anyway, I liked it, just thought there was more needed.
Hope my thoughts are helpful,
I\'ll read Pierced next and let you know what I think,
Sylvia
If you get a chance and feel up to a bit of a different stroke to your own interests, read my new submission Sean The Great in
the nonconsent category. Its been disappointingly unread. I\'d value your feedback
cym
``````````````````
Hello Sylvia,
...and thank you for your feedback on my small effort. Unlike many here who are professional writers, i'm simply a hobbyist and write as a way to process my fantasies and/or experiences. Until very recently, i didn't care one tiny bit about anyone's reactions to what i wrote. However, recently I've come to covet the tools which will make me a clearer, more understandable, writer of these small fictions. One of the tools, of course, involves being open to peer criticism of what i've done so far. ("Peer" is a subjective term as i've used it here; most of my "peers" [you included, of course] are *far* better writers now than i will ever be.)
FYI, my Lit submissions are deliberately short. Since they're not proper stories at all, clearly falling into the category of "character sketches" (as an esteemed Lit editor pointed out to me), there's no natural requirement for length. Additionally, my personal preference from a reader's perspective is toward shorter stories, stories that have multiple chapters if the telling of the story requires that.
I just read your story "The Mountain". You've a very good eye for description and characterization without being flowery and long-winded. Your technical details (spelling, punctuation, etc) are excellent. Your plot was fully developed and interesting. I liked the story very much. It could have been broken into about five or so chapters, but then again, that's my personal preference. I don't know if very long stories like yours get quite the readers that shorter stories get; it may be a problem with the attention span of Lit readers, quite frankly.
Perhaps a repost of your story divided in chapters would boost your reader rates, if you're watching that.
I'll get back to you on your "Sean the Great", too. I *really* like your style in the NC category. Too many stories there are just erotic lovemaking with a mask on, you know? It's-her-loving-hubby-but-she-doesn't-know-that-until-after-the-orgasms kinda stuff. It's refreshing to read well-written stories that are actually, really, about non-consent sexual situations.
Please read my "Pierced" if you have an opportunity. I'd appreciate your feedback on that one. It's got less blood then one might think judging by the title, and the blood it does have is incidental to the story. It's far more about the headspace between an emotionally bonded pair, a submissive masochist and her Dominant, a sadist. It's about what lies between people like that, people who have edgy needs and who've found in each other a perfect complement for the unleashing of those needs.
Thanks again for your feedback. It's valuable stuff.
cym
From: Feedback <feedback@literotica.com>
To: cymbidia <cymbidia@hotmail.com>
Subject: Literotica: Feedback for cymbidia
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 02:32:41 -0400
This message contains feedback for: cymbidia
About the submission: First Meeting
This feedback was sent by: sylviarockon@literotica.org
Comments:
Hi cymbidia, I just read your story First Meeting after joining the discussion circle on the BB
I read the first one on the list. It was well-written if a bit short. I was disappointed it didn\'t go anywhere.
I would\'ve liked to know more about how these characters had met, her they were, how they had built each other
up to the level of anticipation they were experiencing. Maybe some dialogue before they actually meet, could set it up.
You know, maybe they could have a conversation somewhere then the d/s theme would be more of a contrast, you
would feel the shock of the word \"Sir\" along with the characters...
Anyway, I liked it, just thought there was more needed.
Hope my thoughts are helpful,
I\'ll read Pierced next and let you know what I think,
Sylvia
If you get a chance and feel up to a bit of a different stroke to your own interests, read my new submission Sean The Great in
the nonconsent category. Its been disappointingly unread. I\'d value your feedback