Time to end the "Where is the President's Deficit reduction plan" bullshit

Obamaspeak
To be responsible, a leader should express ideas to the American people in clear and informative language. Yet the deficit debate has been marked by Obama’s fondness for referring to “revenues” (taxes), “investments” (spending), the need to “reduce spending in the tax code” (increase taxes), and the importance of “further improving Medicare” (cutting Medicare) by further empowering the Independent Payment Advisory Board, whose cuts—at least under current law—would go to fund Obamacare, not cut the deficit.

Truth on Taxes

He has misled people and incited envy by repeatedly suggesting that wealthier Americans don’t pay their fair share of taxes. Yet Congressional Budget Office (CBO) figures show that if the citizenry is divided into quintiles by income, the top two quintiles pay 99 percent of all federal income taxes, and the top 1 percent pays 40 percent. Nor is this merely reflective of disparities in income: The top two quintiles make three times as much money as the bottom three quintiles but pay 75 times as much in income taxes.

Scare Tactics?
And take Obama’s statement about not having the money for Social Security, veterans’ checks, or disability: The federal government takes in roughly $180 billion every month. (It also borrows $135 billion a month.) Social Security payments are about $60 billion a month, payments to all military personnel (veterans and otherwise) are about $12 billion, and payments to disabled veterans are about $6 billion. That totals about $78 billion. To say that “there may simply not be the money in the coffers” to pay for these items is plainly false. One might even call it “engaging in scare tactics.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/dissembler-chief_576913.html
 
Btw - WHERE IS THE PRESIDENT'S PLAN?

Didn't the CBO say they could not "score a speech?" After his his budget went 0-fer (97 votes against, 0 for) duh1 has not presented anything concrete (in writing) that could be analyzed on voted on.
 
Obamaspeak
To be responsible, a leader should express ideas to the American people in clear and informative language. Yet the deficit debate has been marked by Obama’s fondness for referring to “revenues” (taxes), “investments” (spending), the need to “reduce spending in the tax code” (increase taxes), and the importance of “further improving Medicare” (cutting Medicare) by further empowering the Independent Payment Advisory Board, whose cuts—at least under current law—would go to fund Obamacare, not cut the deficit.

Truth on Taxes

He has misled people and incited envy by repeatedly suggesting that wealthier Americans don’t pay their fair share of taxes. Yet Congressional Budget Office (CBO) figures show that if the citizenry is divided into quintiles by income, the top two quintiles pay 99 percent of all federal income taxes, and the top 1 percent pays 40 percent. Nor is this merely reflective of disparities in income: The top two quintiles make three times as much money as the bottom three quintiles but pay 75 times as much in income taxes.

Scare Tactics?
And take Obama’s statement about not having the money for Social Security, veterans’ checks, or disability: The federal government takes in roughly $180 billion every month. (It also borrows $135 billion a month.) Social Security payments are about $60 billion a month, payments to all military personnel (veterans and otherwise) are about $12 billion, and payments to disabled veterans are about $6 billion. That totals about $78 billion. To say that “there may simply not be the money in the coffers” to pay for these items is plainly false. One might even call it “engaging in scare tactics.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/dissembler-chief_576913.html




Or, one might even call it "lying through his fucking teeth"



Another Obama Lie Exposed:
85% of Bush Tax Cuts Went to Middle Class, Not the Rich



Back in April of this year Barack Obama told the press that he “refused to extend the Bush tax cuts to the wealthy again.”


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4CIMqKF2jo


Of course, it was just another lie.


Here's the actual tax cut breakdown found at CNN Money:

Bush tax cuts: $544.3 billion…

The bulk of that cost — $463 billion — is for the extension of cuts for families making less than $250,000, including two years of relief for 2010 and 2011 for the middle class from the Alternative Minimum Tax.

The rest — $81.5 billion — is attributable to the extension of cuts that apply to the highest income families.

In other words, 85% of the tax cuts went to the middle class.
 
Why is it the Admin's job to come up with an alternative at that point? Seems to be Congress' turn.

Nah, the President is just supposed to keep serving up ideas to the "Party of No" indefinitely. They're going to try to blame him for their failure to negotiate on anything anyway.

The McConnell plan is a fucking joke. Pass a resolution disapproving of the President raising the debt ceiling on his own (which they suggested he do) so that he can veto it and do exactly that? WTF kind of psychotic horse-shit is that? Obama should sign that fucker IF they manage to get it passed, "Fine, I agree, I can't arbitrarily raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval." and kick it right back to them.
 
Nah, the President is just supposed to keep serving up ideas to the "Party of No" indefinitely. They're going to try to blame him for their failure to negotiate on anything anyway.

The McConnell plan is a fucking joke. Pass a resolution disapproving of the President raising the debt ceiling on his own (which they suggested he do) so that he can veto it and do exactly that? WTF kind of psychotic horse-shit is that? Obama should sign that fucker IF they manage to get it passed, "Fine, I agree, I can't arbitrarily raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval." and kick it right back to them.

Many Dems and Repubs would disagre with you. It results in the debt ceiling getting raised, and provides cover to Dems and Repubs up for reelection.


Plan
"As described by McConnell at a news conference last week, his legislation would authorize the president to request of Congress debt ceiling increases in three increments between now and the end of next year. The first would boost the debt limit by $700 billion and the next two by $900 billion each.

Debt fallback plan gains momentum

Along with each request, the president would be required to submit a list of recommended spending cuts -- in an amount higher than the ceiling increase request -- but those cuts would not need to be enacted for the debt limit to go up.

Congress would then vote on -- and probably pass -- "resolutions of disapproval" of those requests. The president probably then would veto those resolutions. Unless Congress overrode those vetoes, which is unlikely, the debt ceiling would increase."

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/07/18/debt.limit.fallback.plan/
 
Last edited:
American Public is Too Stupid To Understand Debt Ceiling Debate and Social Security


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zoDvkhnNdXo

Congresswoman Agrees With President Americans Too Stupid to Understand Complicated Debt Ceiling Debate & Social Security Threat While She Can't Seem to Explain It....

the more she blabs on, the more she sticks her foot in her mouth and proves the point that the stupid ones are not the American public and that Obama is a liar (yet again).


http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/110718 hostage RGB20110718105119.jpg

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/payn110715_cmyk20110715024111.jpg

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb0714cd20110714033831.jpg




. . .
 
Last edited:
Btw - WHERE IS THE PRESIDENT'S PLAN?

Didn't the CBO say they could not "score a speech?" After his his budget went 0-fer (97 votes against, 0 for) duh1 has not presented anything concrete (in writing) that could be analyzed on voted on.


The President's plan is the budget. If Congress doesn't like it, then the ball is in their court.
 
Back
Top