They walk among us

Edward Teach

Mellow
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Posts
3,157
While scanning TV channels the other night, I came across C-Span 3, whereon Ann Coulter in a tight white sweater and short black skirt was addressing the Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute, back in 2006. I settled in to watch, maybe have a good laugh, when a spooky chill hit. You know, one of those sudden frights that sends chills up the sides of your face into your scalp; one of those goose bump producing, nape-of-the-neck tingling, pulse accelerating frights like you get when you think someone may be looking in your window—maybe one of those big eyed, little gray aliens who abducts people.

There in one room were hundreds of Ann Coulter wannabes. Long haired, often blonde, college aged young women wearing tight sweaters and short skirts hanging on her every word, applauding and giggling as their idol skewered the hated Liberals.

When question time came, they asked such things as, “Had you rather speak to a group of Liberals or Conservatives?” and “Do you have any good ideas for a book?” Actually, I kinda thought that second one might have been a sneak question and wondered if maybe Al Franken’s daughter had slipped by security. But, taking a closer look at the questioner, her face all glowing with pride, I knew it was legit.

When asked what field a young woman should go into to have the greatest impact for the cause, Coulter said to avoid Law, unless you wanted to be a lawyer, and that Journalism or Teaching had the greatest prospects for influence.

In response to a question about evolution, Coulter got great approval all around when she said that she had disproved Darwin’s theory so soundly in one of her books that the Liberals hadn’t even challenged her on it. Of course, she said, most of the so-called scientists who believe in evolution aren’t even real scientists, they’re merely biologists—not physicists or even chemists. Scout’s honor, she said that and it went unchallenged.

By now there must be thousands of them.

Edward The Vigilant
 
Last edited:
I lost interest in Coulter the day she said she didn't believe the First Amendment applied to Liberals.
 
She's a freak show - get attention by being completely over-the-top. There's versions in all camps.

I'm a bit sad that CBL hosted her, because what I've seen from them is more of the thoughtful and worthy-of-respect brand of conservatism, rather than the reactionary "librals dumb, haw haw" flavor.
 
Ann Coulter does what most of us (especially ME) would never do... Whore herself and her princpals to sell her shoddy books.
 
The thing is, in the arena of partisan politics there's hardly such thing as principles. I suppose a certain democratic creed applies in places like the U.S. where the habits of democracy are so deeply ingrained - we don't run on a platform of locking up our opponents after we win, for example, and don't (openly) express a desire for bad things to happen to them personally (as opposed to politically)* - but beyond that** there really aren't any principles. In contrast, the kind of debates we have here are all about differences in policy and ideology that are based (almost) purely on principles, rather than partisan advantage and power-seeking.

BTW, for my money and to my knowledge Al Franken has been the left's counterpart to Coulter. Maybe there's another I don't know about, but I've heard enough uncivil crap from him over the years to place him in this category.


*We're usually sincere in that too - I don't suppose many on the left wish for Coulter to get a bad cancer, or for her loved ones to die, and the same for those on the right and their bête noires.

** Actually, historically and compared to many other places in the world those habits and creed are quite a lot - we really shouldn't take them for granted because they represent a major acheivement.
 
Last edited:
I bet she has a lot of angry sex. I wonder if she has orgasms.
 
I bet she has a lot of angry sex. I wonder if she has orgasms.
I honestly don't believe she would allow the man to leave the bed unless she HAD been...serviced. In exactly the way she wanted.
In fact, I'll bet you five katrillion donuts that SHE comes FIRST. No questions asked.
 
Ann Coulter is for entertainment purposes only. The right has precious few like that. The left, of course, has many: Michael Moore, Al Franken, Bill Mahr, John Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Keith Olbermann, etc. and ad infinitum....
 
The left, of course, has many: Michael Moore, Al Franken, Bill Mahr, John Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Keith Olbermann, etc. and ad infinitum....

Dennis Miller, P.J. O'Rourke, Ben Stein. On the libertarian side Penn & Teller, Drew Carey.

~~~~~~

(On reflection, those are pretty strongly libertarian (Stein the closest to real conservative). How is it that there aren't libertarian comics on the Left? Camille Paglia is an intellectual not a comic, but she can be hilarious and she's a left leaning libertarian.)
 
Last edited:
I honestly don't believe she would allow the man to leave the bed unless she HAD been...serviced. In exactly the way she wanted.
In fact, I'll bet you five katrillion donuts that SHE comes FIRST. No questions asked.

I think you're right. But she feels guilty for having sex only with bohemian liberals.
 
Wiki Bio
Coulter contracted with USA Today to cover the 2004 Democratic National Convention. She wrote one article that began, "Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston..." and referred to some unspecified female attendees as "corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons."(ya gotta love this gal!)

While she is in constant demand on the US lecture circuit,[5] Coulter's polemics - she has described herself as a "polemicist" who likes to "stir up the pot" and doesn't "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do"[85] - sometimes start firestorms of controversy, ranging from rowdy uprisings at many of the colleges where she speaks to protracted discussions in the media.

Disenfranchisement of women

TIME Magazine's John Cloud observes that Coulter "likes to shock reporters by wondering aloud whether America might be better off if women lost the right to vote."[4] For example, in a May 2003 interview with The Guardian, Coulter said.[5]

"...It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted.

[149]
Wikinews has related news:
Ann Coulter: Take away women's votes because "women are voting so stupidly"

Again, in an October 2007 interview with the New York Observer, Coulter said:[150]

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.

"It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"

~~~

http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=249163&page=1

Ann Hart Coulter was born December 8, 1961 , in New York City . She and her two older brothers were raised in New Canaan , Connecticut. Coulter has described her family as “upper middle class” and her attorney father a “union buster.”



Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University in 1984 and received her law degree at University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.

Coulter served as a law clerk in Kansas City for Pasco Bowman II of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. After briefly working in private practice in New York City , Coulter went to work for the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee in 1995, handling crime and immigration issues for Sen. Spencer Abraham of Michigan.



Coulter first stepped into the public eye when she was hired in 1996 by MSNBC as a legal correspondent. The channel dismissed her twice, first in February 1997 after she insulted the late Pamela Harriman, the U.S. Ambassador to France, as it was covering her memorial service and again when she tangled with a Vietnam veteran campaigning against landmines.



She made frequent guest appearances on many television and radio talk shows. Coulter is also the author of six books. Her first, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton was published in 1998, making a case for Clinton’s impeachment. Her most recent book If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans was published in October 2007.

~~~

You folks are so damned jealous, green eyed with envy, I have such a big smile....my cheeks hurt...

Ahem...
 
I lost interest in Coulter the day she said she didn't believe the First Amendment applied to Liberals.

I would assume she was not serious about that statement. As has been noted, she is an entertainer.

I remember reading somebody saying it couldn't possibly apply to Nazis. That person was actually serious. Personally, I believe it applies to EVERYBODY, including Nazis and the most bleeding-heart liberals.
 
"...I lost interest in Coulter the day she said she didn't believe the First Amendment applied to Liberals.

I would assume she was not serious about that statement. As has been noted, she is an entertainer.

I remember reading somebody saying it couldn't possibly apply to Nazis. That person was actually serious. Personally, I believe it applies to EVERYBODY, including Nazis and the most bleeding-heart liberals...."

~~~

Y'know Box, you are most like correct, she was not serious, however...

Many of the programs advocated by the radical left, are in fact, an attempt to change, revise and modify the fundamental intentions of the Constitution of the United States and change it from a republic to a social democracy, i.e. a modified socialist society.

The extreme polarization between the two extremes might well be classified as free versus slave and at least I see it that way.

Thus, just perhaps, Ms. Coulter implied that those who strive to overthrow the individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution, should not be protected by that Constitution?

Works for me....


Amicus...
 
~~~

Y'know Box, you are most like correct, she was not serious, however...

Many of the programs advocated by the radical left, are in fact, an attempt to change, revise and modify the fundamental intentions of the Constitution of the United States and change it from a republic to a social democracy, i.e. a modified socialist society.

The extreme polarization between the two extremes might well be classified as free versus slave and at least I see it that way.

Thus, just perhaps, Ms. Coulter implied that those who strive to overthrow the individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution, should not be protected by that Constitution?

Works for me....


Amicus...

I agree that many on the Left would love to emasculate the Second Amendment and make drastic changes in the meaning of the First, and some others. :mad: At the same time, the Right, especially the "Christian" Right, would love to close down sites such as this one and require biblical teaching in schools and make other changes. :mad: Threats to liberty come from extremists of all kinds. :mad:
 
I would assume she was not serious about that statement. As has been noted, she is an entertainer.

I remember reading somebody saying it couldn't possibly apply to Nazis. That person was actually serious. Personally, I believe it applies to EVERYBODY, including Nazis and the most bleeding-heart liberals.
The article I read showed her audience didn't laugh and some verbally agreed with her.
 
Wiki Bio

~~~

You folks are so damned jealous, green eyed with envy, I have such a big smile....my cheeks hurt...

Ahem...

Not hardly.

She's nothing but a fucking joke. Even the right knows she is. The fact that you don't get it is telling.
 
Hi, Cloudy, grins, good ta see ya again...

http://snafu-ed.blogspot.com/2007/10/ann-coulter-wants-to-repeal-19th.html

Friday, October 5, 2007
Ann Coulter wants to repeal the 19th Amendment

Now why would Ann Coulter want to do that? And many of you are probably asking, "what is the 19th Amendment." The 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote.

This is worth a thread all its own, methinks...chuckles...

Ami, devout lover of Indian Maidens....(didja know Sacajawea or was it Pocohontas, had a child at age 15?)

Not shoeshine, silly, Shoshone!

Ahem....
 
Women can vote? When the hell did that happen?

Next thing you know, they'll want to drive cars.......Carney
 
Okay, I got two things to say here – well maybe three:

Teach! You make long blonde hair and tight sweaters sound like a bad thing! Reminds self, if ever to meet Eddie the Vigilant, put up hair and take off the sweater. :p

Ms. Coulter is nothing but a female Howard Stern, a shock jock just ‘cause she can and it’s lucrative. (She is really Amicus)

She does reflect the current trend toward doling out constitutional rights only to those who “deserve” them. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top