Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stfu you stinky paki fuck.
I like these theories. They're rel. simple and they helped me make a bit more sense out of the apparent randomness and chaos dominating the current political landscape. Making order out of chaos:
1.Manufacturing consent https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent
and Indoctrination https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JVqMAlgAnlo
2.The shock doctrine:. http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine
3.The Panopticon: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon
__________________________________
4.The Horseshoe theory https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory
5.Thesis, antithesis, synthesis :https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis,_antithesis,_synthesis
Hash is similar to killswitch1. Both hit some rough spots on their early Lit life. KS had some pics posted which were less than, err, manly. Hash had issues. Both of them stuck it out, kept the same profile even with that being a steeper road than just saying "fuck it" and starting from scratch. I respect that. KS is not tossing his racist bullshit. Hash is pisting with the GB regulars and playing well with others.
Is there ever an end to your comments like the one I quoted?
Not very likely. Should busybody get a pass too?
I was also wandering about Edward Snowden.
Upon his initial revelations I was just as excited as everybody else, and thought he was a hero.
But as time went by, I started to doubt the "regular guy / hero who takes down an empire" myth. I don't believe that he would have been able to do all the things that he did, on his own, plus the material that he leaked showed some partiality. I'm certain that he's a patriot, but he was rel. young and he could have been manipulated.
Naomi Wolf commented that it's in a Police State's interest to make it's subjects aware that they're under scrutiny and close surveillance. Because, just like prisoners who are observed from the central tower of the panopticon, that awareness that they are under 24 hour surveillance by an ellusive entity makes them less likely to rebel or try to break free.
The Police State thus achieves the same outcome that they would have achieved through coercive or violent means. But in a more peaceful cost-effective manner': through subtle shaping of the subjects' behavior.
Initially I thought that Naomi Wolf's theory was wacky, but it's starting to make sense.
And even if it might not apply to Edward Snowden, I'm sure that there are other situations in which it might ring true.
Hash is similar to killswitch1.
The latest, as applied to the EU (Islam vs. Christianity) and probably to other political and religious movements in the States as well:
Thesis = Christianity
Antithesis = Islam
Synthesis = a new world order
Thesis, antithesis, synthesis
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis,_antithesis,_synthesis
"The triad, also known as the dialectical method, is usually described in the following way:
The thesis is an intellectual proposition.
The antithesis is simply the negation of the thesis, a reaction to the proposition.
The synthesis solves the conflict between the thesis and antithesis by reconciling their common truths and forming a new thesis, starting the process over.
The term originated with Johann Fichte, and is often used to describe the thought of Hegel.
It forms an important part of the basis for the Marxist theory of history."
The problem with the dialectic method is that the identification of the thesis and antithesis is self defined by the analyst. Why is Islam antithetical to Christianity? To any observer outside of the Western mainstream, thy are more similar than different. Why isn't secularism the antithesis to each?
Well, I was watching this thing on youtube. And their theory was that the mess and animosity between the two religions /cultures that's happening in Europe is not just accidental or as a result of unwise policies. And that massmedia and even politicians are set on artificially pitting those two against each other, through various and subtle means.
I'm not saying that globalization doesn't have positive aspects.
But there's also a dark side to it. Globalisation should mean several communities that collaborate on a global level, while maintaining their autonomy and cultural identity.
Whereas the current tendency and their agenda is for uniformity and destruction of national and cultural identity, and one world government. The same way in which EU functioned in Europe: you had EU officials taking unilateral decisions behind closed doors, above the heads of the individual nations .