The US needs more democrats like this

renard_ruse

Break up Amazon
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Posts
16,094
Stupak expressed a desire to support the 2009 health care reform bill put forth by President Obama,[8] but wanted restrictions on coverage for abortion.[9] Therefore, Stupak and Republican Congressman Joseph R. Pitts submitted an amendment known as the Stupak-Pitts Amendment to prohibit such payments. The Stupak-Pitts Amendment was adopted by the House of Representatives, but a similar anti-abortion provision was defeated in the Senate version of the legislation (known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act).[10] Stupak announced that he and several other Democratic representatives who supported health reform legislation but opposed abortion would not vote for the final version of the legislation unless the Stupak-Pitts Amendment was included.[11] The ensuing controversy made Stupak "perhaps the single most important rank-and-file House member in passing the bill."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Stupak
 
I'm all for it as long as you make sure all things to do with reproduction go unfunded.

No more boner pills...p rostate anything....vasectomies.......fertility drugs...artificial insemination....none of it.
 
Last edited:
What makes the girls special? This is about fully grown women and your need to subjugate them. It makes perfect sense, you're just so filled with hate that you can't see common sense. Either that or your a troll, it's increasingly difficult to tell the trolls from the honest folk on the right around here.
 
There are many people who have left the Democrats over their uncompromising pro-abortion extremism, who would consider returning if they would move the center and support some reasonable compromises.

Bart was a leader of the Democratic Pro-Life Caucus. We need more members in the Caucus.
 
I'm all for it as long as you make sure all things to do with reproduction go unfunded.

No more boner pills...p rostate anything....vasectomies.......fertility drugs...artificial insemination....none of it.

Which one of those takes a life?
 
Then how does killing a pregnant woman result in double homicide charges?


The do not do that for a corpse in possession of boner pills...

Because. That is the only reason.

do you wish me to explain the logical fallacy you just used?
 
BB just proved that.

Probably because after he gets her "medicated" and laid, he does not want to be punished with child-support by the 'liberal' courts...

;) ;)

What I have to say on the matter is irrelevant, the decision is entirely hers. Why can you not understand that?:confused:

Yes Dr. Gosnell...



:shudder:

I never supported murder.......wtf are you talking about?
 
Gosnell

Why is the aberrant always trotted out as if it were the norm?
 
Then how does killing a pregnant woman result in double homicide charges?


The do not do that for a corpse in possession of boner pills...

There is no sense in charging a double homicide for killing a pregnant woman. Not when abortion is legal. I've never understood that, but then I'm not a legislator. They do lots of stuff that make no sense to me.

And Botany, there is no relationship between birth control and Viagra. I hear that error all the time. One is used to prevent a pregnancy, when there is nothing physically wrong with the woman. The other is used to treat a physiological condition, which makes it more akin to blood pressure medication than birth control.
 
to answer a question. He did murder in the name of abortion.

Not used as an example of the norm.

I understand that, but then why every time that abortion is now raised as a topic does his name emerge?
 
Back
Top