The Trumper List - See if the member you're talking to was / is one

[RoryN]

Here it is, for reference / parody purposes - a list of those who have, in their Literotica commentary, outwardly supported Donald Trump. I use "Trumper" to describe his supporters, since that term is used by both left and right-wing publications.

Since the Trumpers on this forum celebrate key tenets of labeling, profiling, "scarlet lettering" people such as Muslims, tout HUAC, etc., and stand behind a leader who uses these concepts daily, I can only assume they will respect this thread.

Post suggestions (and evidence, if necessary) on who should be added. Trumpers: if you wish to be added, let me know. I expect you will want to self-identify.

To be added to / edited when necessary:

AJ / 4est / WoundedKnee BANNED / SpeareChucker
GiaCat
snugglestruggle
toubab
BB BANNED
Beco
DooleyDarter
Libsam
BotanyBoy BANNED
Saint_Ann / Ms Ann / Ann_Tagonist BANNED
FGB
Christobal
Ishmael BANNED
Porkwarrior
jp55665566
GimpyIntellect
julybaby04
Que BANNED
toeskr
Bill_Cosplay
Ubiquitious_too
PatriotLover
Miles BANNED
renard_ruse
Dazzle1
akatrex
beew BANNED
chillywilly2
bigsly (eyer) BANNED
contrifan32
VaticanAssassin
RUlookingup
boogerflipper BANNED
eyer BANNED
JBJ BANNED
lovecraft68
HisArpy
Rightguide
NeverEndingMe / VeryBadMan / ThatsTheGuy / TeflonGuy / HelpImLost BANNED
Boxlicker101
EternalFantasies
Ellie Talbot
sircumvent
bellisarius
trysail
Ramone45
Amoebah BANNED
Mello_SixtyNine
FakeNews BANNED
coachdb18 BANNED
OldJourno
TalkRadio BANNED
xfrodobagginsx

 

[Adre]

I'd say Query and his alt army rush to Don's defense pretty regularly.

 

[snugglestruggle]

Here it is, for reference / parody purposes - a list of those who have, in their Literotica commentary, outwardly supported Donald Trump. I use "Trumper" to describe his supporters, since that term is used by both left and right-wing publications. After all, let's be fair.

Because of the chaotic nature of responses to this election, it's time-consuming to wade through it all. Also, after the election is over, some will attempt to gloss over and talk past their previous allegiances. Since the Trumpers on this forum have shown during Trump's candidacy that they celebrate key tenets of labeling, profiling, "scarlet lettering" people such as Muslims, tout HUAC, etc., and have no issues with a man who holds these concepts so dearly, I can only assume they will respect this thread.

Post suggestions (and evidence, if necessary) on who should be added. Trumpers: if you wish to be added, let me know. I expect you will want to self-identify.

To be added to / edited when necessary:

Libsam
Snugglestruggle
AJ / 4est
toubab
BB

I object to you not using the term "Deplorables" to describe Trump supporters. Call a Spade, a Spade as they say, which BTW is the essence of being a deplorable. Why? Because we're all racist, xenophobes and misogynists.

So if your going to do something, do it right FFS. I should also be named King of Deplorables.

 

[Liar]

I object to you not using the term "Deplorables" to describe Trump supporters. Call a Spade, a Spade as they say, which BTW is the essence of being a deplorable. Why? Because were all racist, xenophobes and misogynists.

So if your going to do something, do it right FFS. I should also be named King of Deplorables.

Hey now, Hillary only said half of you.

Now, the question is: Which half?

https://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Gotham-TV-series-Two-Face.jpg

 

[RoryN]

I object to you not using the term "Deplorables" to describe Trump supporters.

You're angry.

This is understandable.

 

[Disgustipated]

Why not Trumpeters?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I don't understand shaming people for using their vote in the manner they see fit. Most of the media is doing this too. I think it's a precedent we will all regret soon enough.

 

[Stewart_Pidd]

all this talk of Trump is very taxing bro!

Stew

 

[RoryN]

I don't understand shaming people for using their vote in the manner they see fit. Most of the media is doing this too. I think it's a precedent we will all regret soon enough.

Why?

.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Why?

.

It's wrong to shame people for exercising their right to vote by selecting the candidate of their choice. You really can't see that? You can do it here all you want, but the media is now doing it, opening ridiculing citizens who aren't doing what they are told. That's downright sick. We will all regret this one day, but by then it will be too late. One day your candidate will be the one out of favor. Then you will understand.

 

[RoryN]

It's wrong to shame people for exercising their right to vote by selecting the candidate of their choice.

There's no mention of "vote" or voting in the op.

 

[domroger]

Trump is slang for fart in Northern England .

 

[Darbhinder]

There's no mention of "vote" or voting in the op.

*Chuckles*
Using ladyf's go to move against her...nice

 

[Darbhinder]

Trumpeting lib tossers.

 

[Que]

Link, racist?

 

[RoryN]

*Chuckles*
Using ladyf's go to move against her...nice

I know LadyF; she's highly intelligent regardless of any areas we may diverge philosophically or politically. I'm not deliberately being a dick to her - though I do enjoy debating, period. And will wallow in +important+ semantics when necessary.

 

[RoryN]

Link, racist?

You want evidence?

That's weird; Trumpers usually require none. Maybe you aren't one...

...wait: you made the request because you feel it will benefit you. Ah, then - back on the list.

 

[sr71plt]

JBJ (Noirtrash) definitely, although now he's claiming Trump can't win. But since that last election, I've followed every political prognostication JBJ has made, so that I can be confident that the opposite will happen.

 

[Not Normal]

Why not Trumpeters?

Because people who have learned the craft of trumpet playing, who believe that making music and adding beauty to the world, don't want to be associated with the Orange Monster.

It's wrong to shame people for exercising their right to vote by selecting the candidate of their choice. You really can't see that? You can do it here all you want, but the media is now doing it, opening ridiculing citizens who aren't doing what they are told. That's downright sick. We will all regret this one day, but by then it will be too late. One day your candidate will be the one out of favor. Then you will understand.

Its funny you say that. Shaming people seems to be your hobby.

 

[Que]

You want evidence?

That's weird; Trumpers usually require none. Maybe you aren't one...

...wait: you made the request because you feel it will benefit you. Ah, then - back on the list.

So, you just find Trump supporter to be a convenient label to smear people that you don't like because they point out your character flaws such as your inherent racism.

It's interesting to me that Clinton sycophants, such as yourself, will simply simply parrot her Trump smears and smears of trump supporters instead of extolling any of her absent virtues.

Have you considered thinking for yourself? Maybe taking a look at Clinton's policy positions and finding those that you think would be popular enough to encourage others to be as enthusiastic about Clinton as you are?

Let's start with why this is so important to her campaign. Her negatives were earned honestly. They are not some artifact from the Obama campaign and certainly predate Trump entering the race. On the other hand Trump's negatives are largely conflations and distortions by the Clinton campaign. Trying to extend those to Trump supporters or, as in my case Clinton haters is bad tactics, so I hope that her campaiign and lick-spittle useful idiots, such as yourself keep it up.

Not that you've asked my opinion about Trump, which is a pretty simple question to ask, I am not a trump supporter; he's not merely reactionary enough for my taste. Think of every position of his that you hate move the needle about three gradients to the right of that and that's roughly where I would be. Trump is essentially more liberal than Clinton. his only redeeming feature is that he's not a social conservative. Which I personally consider an oxymoron there's no such thing as a social conservative there's nothing conservative about what social conservatives stand for.

Tat'sh not to say that I would vote for Clinton. I wouldn't vote for Clinton if you paid me. I would not even vote for Bill Clinton if you paid me. He at least knows how to be pragmatic and work with the other side of the aisle something that Mts. Clinton will find as out of her skill set as much as the current ineffectual occupant of the White House does.

A side benefit of this little name and shame campaign of yours is it will increase the tendency of people who can't stomach Clinton lying to pollsters which will suppress the Democrat vote because like you they will be doing their victory dance instead of showing up at the polls. Myself I can't really see driving 500 Miles round-trip to my polling station in order to cast a vote for probably Johnson.

 

[sr71plt]

I laughed and laughed at the idea of Trump supporters objecting that someone would be smeared for supporting another candidate.

 

[Not Normal]

So, you just find Trump supporter to be a convenient label to smear people that you don't like because they point out your character flaws such as your inherent racism.

It's interesting to me that Clinton sycophants, such as yourself, will simply simply parrot her Trump smears and smears of trump supporters instead of extolling any of her absent virtues.

Have you considered thinking for yourself? Maybe taking a look at Clinton's policy positions and finding those that you think would be popular enough to encourage others to be as enthusiastic about Clinton as you are?

Let's start with why this is so important to her campaign. Her negatives were earned honestly. They are not some artifact from the Obama campaign and certainly predate Trump entering the race. On the other hand Trump's negatives are largely conflations and distortions by the Clinton campaign. Trying to extend those to Trump supporters or, as in my case Clinton haters is bad tactics, so I hope that her campaiign and lick-spittle useful idiots, such as yourself keep it up.

Not that you've asked my opinion about Trump, which is a pretty simple question to ask, I am not a trump supporter; he's not merely reactionary enough for my taste. Think of every position of his that you hate move the needle about three gradients to the right of that and that's roughly where I would be. Trump is essentially more liberal than Clinton. his only redeeming feature is that he's not a social conservative. Which I personally consider an oxymoron there's no such thing as a social conservative there's nothing conservative about what social conservatives stand for.

Tat'sh not to say that I would vote for Clinton. I wouldn't vote for Clinton if you paid me. I would not even vote for Bill Clinton if you paid me. He at least knows how to be pragmatic and work with the other side of the aisle something that Mts. Clinton will find as out of her skill set as much as the current ineffectual occupant of the White House does.

A side benefit of this little name and shame campaign of yours is it will increase the tendency of people who can't stomach Clinton lying to pollsters which will suppress the Democrat vote because like you they will be doing their victory dance instead of showing up at the polls. Myself I can't really see driving 500 Miles round-trip to my polling station in order to cast a vote for probably Johnson.

Worth watching

 

[Libsam]

I'm at the top of the McCarthyism list!!

That's very Nixonian of you, RoryN.

 

[Que]

I'm at the top of the McCarthyism list!!

That's very Obama-nable of you, RoryN.

FYP. The Democrats of late and Obama in particular have taken nixonian retribution to new levels.

 

[Hypoxia]

FYP. The Democrats of late and Obama in particular have taken nixonian retribution to new levels.

Citation?